🌋⚡️🔥💥💢Request: please make a flamewars category coloured yellow, with red text.
-
-
It irritates me to no end that they (more or less) get it right in the tab, but not in the body of the page! That's a special kind of stupid.
Right in the tab but wrong in the body? That's what I've got on Chrome on OSX (except I have so many tabs in this window that I can only see up to the flame). Oh, and the tooltip is right too.
I know too much about the fuckery in font rendering; I do not want to investigate why things are so wrong in case I get sucked into trying to fix it.
-
Right in the tab but wrong in the body? That's what I've got on Chrome on OSX (except I have so many tabs in this window that I can only see up to the flame). Oh, and the tooltip is right too.
With Windows 8/8.1 it seems to be mostly right in the tab but adds an extra square despite rendering all 5 characters, for reasons.
-
I give up.
-
With Windows 8/8.1 it seems to be mostly right in the tab but adds an extra square despite rendering all 5 characters, for reasons.
Yeah, that's what I said. Some special kind of stupid.
-
Chrome on Android
-
That's the best! Is it consistent?
-
Mobile only seems to want to show it there
-
Discoursistency!
Btw, the title of this reply box has the emoji.
-
Opera on Linux: everything works.
Lesson: The weirder the combination of software is, the better it works.
-
Chromesistency.
Apparently Chrome uses two different renderers and one can do font substitution and one can't. On Windows, that is.
Opera on Linux: everything works.
On Linux it seems to work in everything, because in Linux all available font renderers (if you don't do it with raw Xlib, which nobody does any more) do automatic font substitution. Chrome on Linux works just fine if you have at least one font with the necessary characters.
-
Chrome on Linux works just fine if you have at least one font with the necessary characters.
It seems better now, but it didn't used to. I know because I got real glyphs with FF and Opera that were boxes with chrome. I've installed a lot of fonts.
-
I'm renewing and seconding this request. I usually jeff topics about "political crap, religion, abortion," climate change, demographics, ebonics, neofeminism, and so on to General, so that Side Bar WTF can stay true to its mission. This sometimes gets reverted, I believe partly by misapprehension ("This is a WTF, it should be with the WTFs!") and partly by entitlement ("I want a bunch of eyeballs, so it goes in Side Bar WTF, because that's where the eyeballs are. "). Having a dedicated category for these sorts of threads would help people invested in them find and maintain them, and de-clutter other categories for people who aren't interested.
-
I will say that for "Verification Deniers," I purposely put it there, because it's about a bunch of computer programs that share a major WTF. Even though the discussion moved to more general themes.
-
Ah, I apologize. I don't have read access to the journal article you were talking about, and I initially assumed it was the standard "when humans collected samples they were interpreted inconsistently and then proponents used the most favorable interpretation for all samples" argument. Reading the abstract and reviewing the preview images from the article, that it's about software sampling errors is much more clear.
-
I have trouble taking anything you say seriously with this avatar.
-
It's actually spelled guerrilla. Two l's.
BITCH!COMPLAIN!