Spoiler alert....
-
Fucking thread hijackers....
-
BUT....strangely on topic... WTF.
-
So we went from anti-topical to topical...In order to keep up appearances, someone needs to talk about misandry or polls.
-
The only difficulty here is that it makes the image completely hidden. That makes it difficult to know what's there. I changed mine to this:
.spoiled:hover { color: white; } .spoiled { text-shadow: none; text-color: Gray; background-color: Gray; } .spoiled * { filter: none; visibility: hidden; } .spoiled:hover * { visibility: visible; }
Which gives:
Edit: Apparently, Stylebot strips out
!important
.
-
Chrome 36 doesn't honour user stylesheets any more. WTF. (It's been a while since I tried.)
-
Yeah, I had to install Stylebot
-
Only difference I see between yours and mine is the preference of "spoiler color". I went with black, you went with gray.
And I keep seeing @zecc breaking the damn thing.
-
-
Ah, the first time I saw yours, I thought it had
span.spoiler
. Looking back, it now only has.spoiler
. Was that part of your edit?
-
Yes, I changed it to just the class, thanks to the added link at the end of my post, where apparently the spoilers were on <div>s as well.
-
Many improved. Much happy. Good thanks.
-
You should consider choosing a better picture of yourself.
Many places consider CVs with photos on to be a "faux pas".Most agencies will remove or blank photos (along with names and anythingelse that could be considered "potentially discriminatory") before sending CVs on anyway. That's why my CV is pseudonymous, using the name "Cunty McCuntface III, Esq." and having goatse as the photo. Either the "man in the middle" agency will sanitise it for me, or it will go through as is - in the latter case it's a win as well, as it will attract attention. I find that stamping "handle carefully, live anthrax spores" on the envelope is a good way of getting more attention.
My photo evokes the same feelings I get when end users get their hands on my beautiful, beautiful software that I've been crafting for months.
So does mine.
-
Many places consider CVs with photos on to be a "faux pas".
I thought we were talking about avatars. People put photos in CVs?
-
-
-
People put photos in CVs?
It was a thing in the 90s. Not so sure these days, not having had to seriously craft a dead tree version of one since...
-
Since the time photos in CVs where a thing?
-
It was a thing in the 90s. Not so sure these days
Ah, before my time. The first CV I made was probably around 2004.
-
[spoiler]
this works @ben_lubar- and this does not @ben_lubar hell it doesn't even @mention properly inside a spoiler
- and this does not
- and this does not
Sadness ensues. The first time I tried to do a spoiler, I put an <ol> in it, then it doesn't work, so I figured that I didn't know how to do spoilers right.
I should have known it was just the parser going bonkers and jacking it up.
-
Well, one of those mentions worked. Not sure which one.
-
So, Discourse as normal?
-
Sounds like it.
-
Well, one of those mentions worked. Not sure which one.
Awesome. [spoiler]@codinghorror[/spoiler] How about half-fuzzed? I think my spoiler got spoiled.
-
-
Awesome. @codinghorror How about half-fuzzed? I think my spoiler got spoiled.
You bastard!
Nice one. Wouldn't click again though.
-
[spoiler]Y'know, if it weren't for the hilarious and unpredictable ways you can screw with Discourse, I'd probably have gone back to lurking weeks ago. Does that mean I have Discourse Syndrome?[/spoiler]
[spoiler]Try @Onyx mention?[/spoiler]
-
Try @Onyx mention?
Nope. Just got the reply notification. And bombed myself, let's see what I get.
Edit: apparently, I can't @-mention myself.
-
Y'know, if it weren't for the hilarious and unpredictable ways you can screw with Discourse, I'd probably have gone back to lurking weeks ago. Does that mean I have Discourse Syndrome?
Depends. Do you actually like or love Discourse? Or do you have more negative feelings towards the platform?
-
[spoiler]And you can't spoiler quotes, plus spoilers get stripped from highlighted reply quotes so now it's spoiled![/spoiler]
@darkmatter said:Try @Onyx mention?
[spoiler]At least they work right when you use the button[/spoiler][spoiler][/spoiler]
@darkmatter said:[spoiler]Y'know, if it weren't for the hilarious and unpredictable ways you can screw with Discourse, I'd probably have gone back to lurking weeks ago. Does that mean I have <a href="http://what.thedailywtf.com/t/poll-do-you-have-discourse-syndrome/1158">Discourse Syndrome?</a>[/spoiler]
[spoiler]Try <a href="">@Onyx</a> mention?[/spoiler]
-
Do you actually like or love Discourse? Or do you have more negative feelings towards the platform?
[spoiler]I like that it is broken in ways that are entertaining? Other than that, I don't care. 99% of the features that exist in Discourse but not in other forums, I do not use. Lack of paging is annoying, but auto-updating topics are nice. They'd be nicer if I hadn't written an infini-scroll (done right, fully loading the topic and using the real scrollbar only) AJAX auto-updating personal forum 8 years ago that I used to communicate with my friends from work. Sure, I didn't have "likes" in my forum, but we could communicate just fine.
;
edit - Not that I'm saying my forum was better (well, other than at scrolling), it was just a thrown-together piece of crap. I guess I'm just surprised it took this long for the AJAX real-time post loading forum thing to catch on?[/spoiler]
-
It's not so much that 'AJAX realtime' has taken long enough to take off. It's more than that stalwarts of the forum industry invariably get run on shitty shared hosting services.
Discourse requires a VPS, and not the bottom of the range either. But these two factors mean that Discourse isn't mainstream.
Then of course, remember that most forums are dying because of Facebook anyway...
-
-
I'd say you are probably not suffering from Discourse Syndrome.
-
Network tab in inspector shows requests being fired, so it's definitely polling. And I asked the same question... somewhere, I think the monstrosity that is the Likes thread, but no one seemed interested in the discussion :(
-
Discourse features are intuitive and obviously done the right way.They should not require clarifications.
Filed under: Even when they are not Discourse features
https://github.com/discourse/discourse-spoiler-alert/blob/master/assets/javascripts/spoiler.js
-
-
@darkmatter said:
blah
I'm not reading any of your posts because of your dumbass spoiler snenanigans.Damn it. @dhromed beat me to it. Now I'll just look like a lame follower.
Oh well. I don't like the default spoiler look, so I'm using a custom CSS, and mousing over @darkmatter's posts is too much work. I will now pretend his posts don't exist. .
-
Spoilers, hardcore mode:
span.spoiled { color: black!important; text-shadow: none!important; } span.spoiled:after { content: " (spoiler)"; }
-
span.spoiled { text-decoration: stink-lines; }
-
What if spoilers make the font size really big.
And the letter-spacing really small.
-
What if spoilers make the font size really big.
And the letter-spacing really small.
Filed under: Unicode inside a spoiler abuse ahoy!
-
Don't even need to bother. [spoiler]
Using as much HTML as possible already fucks over all the regulars that have written their own custom stylesheets in an attempt to fix the fugliness[/spoiler]
-
Sweet.
Yet Another Dicsourse Abuse.YADA YADA YADA
-
That's so nice of you to fuck with our custom stylesheets.
-
That one used to kill more than just the custom ones until @PJH fixed it this morning
-
Really? I was sleeping this morning.
-
Yarly:
-
Really? I was sleeping this morning.
It fucked it up for everyone. 3-liner CSS change fixed it though.