Wherein :disco::horse_racing: has no :fa_truck:'s to give
-
-
And right there is your problem. No one likes an unfunny dickweed.
-
-
That is provably incorrect. You have given at minimum two foxes.
-
-
-
Yes, yes, a claim made frequently that you have seen something.
Did you understand it?
-
-
Ah so I was right, after all.
-
-
Don't you have your own thread for that shite?
-
I'm waiting to see how long it takes before Fox realises he's on par with Jeff for not stopping digging a hole for himself.
-
Your logic is incomprehensible.
-
Only to you.
-
From what strange dictionary are you getting your definition of "only"? Because I assure you, it is not any of the ones normal people use.
-
You don't like it when people do this shit to you, I take it?
Welcome to what WTDWTF is like when debating with you.
-
I'm waiting to see how long it takes before Arantor realizes he's on par with Jeff for not stopping digging a hole for himself.
-
Cute.
-
-
I see @fox logic is going to be a regular feature this year.
-
-
You have scarred me with that ugly creature. Imagine me tutting disapprovally in our future interactions.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
No, I thought it was tired and derivative.
-
-
I mean any thread I don't read.
-
Somehow discourse put this topic in my notifications as unread, even though it has no reason to. I had to refresh the page to get the topic to load and now it isn't even in my notifications anymore. Either way, it's an appropriate topic considering how Discourse is misbehaving at the moment...
-
ah.... now the title is 20% cooler.
:-D
-
I love it how it's now pretty much completely impossible to get the context for this, since there is no way in hell I can figure out what the OP was originally in response to.
-
Context? Is that writing that robbed a bank or something?
-
I love it how it's now pretty much completely impossible to get the context for this, since there is no way in hell I can figure out what the OP was originally in response to.
Impossible?https://what.thedailywtf.com/t/in-other-news-today/50872/170
edit: Cool nonebox, Dickhorse.
edit2: Oh fuck you, Dickhorse. Broken onebox fixes itself when I edit the post to make a comment about the broken onebox.
-
Impossible?
Ok, let me rephrase that:
- The in-reply-to link doesn't do a thing
- The link back to the thread where this was jeffed from leads to the jeffing notice, not what this was in reply to. Which is fine I guess, but not helpful
- The damned in-reply-to link doesn't even have a fucking
href
I could look at using the inspector or whatnot
Since I didn't read the discussion where this was jeffed from, and clicking that gutter link frelled up my tracking in there, yes, it's almost damned impossible for me to figure out happened here.
To be clear, I blame
-
The in-reply-to link doesn't do a thing
No, but in the spirit of true Discoursistency the "Replies" button on the original post does link to the OP of this topic
So the link is broken but only one way. Presumably they use the post_number to link them one way but post_id the other...
-
post_number
Ah, yes, the best parameter they could choose: a value relative to not only the current thread, but also other posts preceding the post within a thread. What could possibly go horribly and hilariously wrong?
-
What could possibly go horribly and hilariously wrong?
Presumably this is one of the Discourse mottos.
-
edit2: Oh fuck you, Dickhorse. Broken onebox fixes itself when I edit the post to make a comment about the broken onebox.
Shit like this is what takes from being merely terrible broken software, and allows it to
soarplummet to transcendant levels of horridness. It's not just that the software is bad, it's that the software is bad, knows that it is bad, and somehow wants to take revenge upon its users for how bad it is.