The Official Funny Stuff Thread™
-
That does not justify the posting of upskirt pics.
-
But seriously, what's the problem with upskirt pics?
-
That does not justify the posting of upskirt pics.
Someone saying "sure you can post this photo of me" does not justify posting that photo of them?
Well okay then.
seriously, what's the problem with upskirt pics?
If the person can be identified from the picture, and it's taken and/or shared without their consent?
Luckily, that doesn't seem to apply in this case.
-
If the person can be identified from the picture, and it's taken and/or shared without their consent?
If it's a celebrity and taken in public, why not? It's not like someone forced them to go commando.
-
If it's a celebrity
What's that got to do with it?
taken in public
Lemme guess, you can tell that for sure by looking at the picture.
-
What's that got to do with it?
If you are a celebrity, you are less protected from private life invasion generally. Cf. slander, libel in case of public person.
you can tell that for sure by looking at the picture.
Honestly, I personally don't see a problem with any upskirt pictures, but I was trying to find some arguments for this particular one. As you yourself said, she's apparently okay with publishing it, so the point is moot anyway.
-
she's apparently okay with publishing it
Safe bet if you follow it up with a Playboy shoot. 21 years ago.
-
-
EDIT: Discourse screwed the spoiler so...
https://what.thedailywtf.com/uploads/default/original/3X/0/e/0e03b96b57322710c574bd7e754a33157967a4c9.png[The original photo was taken in the 1994 Rio carnival.][1]
(this has been on here before)
[1]: https://iconicphotos.wordpress.com/tag/carnival/
-
-
-
Stop ninjaing posts, every time I look at your post, it has something added or removed.
-
(this post has been fbmac'd and will be deleted in infinity hours even if flagged)
-
The original photo was taken in the 1994 Rio carnival.
photos taken from below can be unflattering. click for uncensored version.
In what way is that unflattering?
-
Marzo 1994
So anyway, even the picture has reached the consent age by now, so I really don't see anything wrong with it.
-
In what way is that unflattering?
Dunno - has this topic been mistaken for the fanny stuff topic?
-
-
-
Hmm, I somehow always mistakenly associated American "fanny" referring to huge fat arses with fanny packs.
That thread seems nice though, at least as far as I looked.
-
@loopback0 said:
The original photo was taken in the 1994 Rio carnival.
photos taken from below can be unflattering. click for uncensored version.
In what way is that unflattering?
The expression it caught on her face was pretty unflattering.
-
Saw this on planet rock's twitter feed today.
-
-
If it's a hamburger menu, hamburgers should pop out. I want my money back.
-
TIL what happens when someone Jeffs away the post that earned your first like.
Also, I hear jonthomas is a real dick.
-
Mostly coincidentally...
-
If that came from meta.derp, isn't it probably the same reason?
I mean, it's not as if guessing a tdwtf user would have had posts jeffed away on meta.derp oh wait.
-
-
Wait...how come I don't have First Like?
-
-
Wait...how come I don't have First Like?
You do. Presumably it wasn't a recent award.
-
So I do, but it's not on my notification history, which is no more than what you see in the screenshot above.
-
Discourse.
-
Yes, you have the badge. Do you really expect your notification history to go back to the beginning of time?
-
jonthomas
WhoTF is that guy? There's no such user.
<inb4 whoosh
Edit: never mind, noticed it's meta
-
Presumably, the discussion is still about meta.d
-
-
As a side note kangaroo tastes really good. Seriously we should eat more of them.
-
As a side note kangaroo tastes really good.
Kangaroo steaks are indeed tasty, but the ones I've had needed plenty of cooking. Maybe higher-quality ones would be even better?
-
Dog with problem solving skills
-
Kangaroo tastes good as burgers too.
-
Apparently I don't get to full screen this video. Thanks Dicksauce.
-
She almost had it! Just one logical leap more and the world would have been that much better for her!
-
-
Gender conformist! Don't impose your skewed cis-world-view on that poor cat!
-
Aren't those things that are hanging under the tail the balls?
Oh, you want me to zoom in to find out? ...Okay, let me go somewhere private for the inspection...
Hard to tell. Doesn't seem to match the typical profile for testicles though, unless someone did a really bad job...
-
Meh, I don't have a degree in biology so maybe we should ask our local expert with a few degrees in that field but those look like balls to me.
Anyway I just wanted to question your SJW apologist behaviour by calling a dog who you presumably don't know the gender of a "she". The default is he as mandated by the Patriarchy. You can inquire further in your local chapter.
-
question
Well, after a long (for me) conversation with @Gaska, I question everything. Despite normally trying to avoid assumptions, I decided to relax my fears. Seems it was to no good effect.
-
normally trying to avoid assumptions
But you assumed it was a girl-dog. You should have said something politically correct like a Canine American of unknown gender.
-
But you assumed it was a girl-dog
I know!
You should have said something politically correct
I No!unknown gender.
Well, to your credit, the actual imgur page titles it a "He", so assuming the poster knows, you would have been correct.
However, this would have required research of which I was not prepared to do (being on mobile), and so assumptions (which normally would not be made, supposedly, theoretically, I don't even know anymore) were used, and for that I apologize for degrading anyone adversely affected by by ignorant words.
-
the actual imgur page titles it a "He"
See, I told you those are balls!
I apologize for degrading anyone adversely affected by by ignorant words.
I accept on behalf of the dog.