Is @Accalia's date format close enough to ISO? YOU DECIDE!
-
I'm trying to install Crystal Reports (yes, ) on my terminal server, and it's always complaining about unable to install because of a pending reboot. My memory is rememberizing that I've had similar problems in the past related to the network printers that are GPO deployed on employee sessions, and the GPO changes tripping a pending changes flag that "requires" reboot. And I know I've found the TechNet article in the past that tells me where that registry key is and what I need to do to remove the suppressed reboot.... and my Google-Fu is completely failing me this afternoon.
Does anyone else remember/know what I'm talking about, able to help a brutha out?
-
I'm sure it's the key listed here that's helped me in the past.
-
Thanks much. I knew I'd seen it before. I must be getting as old as @accalia... I even remember going uphill in blinding snow storms to get to maintenance windows!
-
I must be getting as old as @accalia likes to pretend to be...
FTFY unless you consider 1986.06.02 old.
Filed Under: You can do the math from there
-
I'm younger than that and I'm very definitely old.
-
I feel old since I am more than 2 orbits older than that date.
-
-
-
I'm younger than that and I'm very definitely old.
Yeah, well, it sounds like that's due to where you work.
-
I must be getting as old as @accalia.
I can understand how you feel. Working with such a configuration would make me feel terminally ill as well.
-
It is ISO 8601 date format. Except I replaces the - separator with .
-
So it's not ISO 8601 date format.
I'm sure there's some grounds for somewhere.
-
Derived from ISO 8601
-
-
Derived from ISO 8601
You're going with inheritance, eh? As in
Accalia_Date_Format extends ISO_Date_Format
?
-
That will work.
-
And pendantry averted in the process. I r sad, no pendantry flags today.
-
-
Well played. Well played indeed.
-
And pendantry averted in the process. I r sad, no pendantry flags today.
you had potential, but it needed more rules lawyering to get me to flag. ;-)
-
you had potential, but it needed more rules lawyering to get me to flag. ;-)
Subverting the form was always the intent because
$deity
forbid I ever do anything normal.
-
-
Normal: what everyone else appears to be that I refuse to allow to contaminate me.
-
i approve of that definition
-
Derived from ISO 8601
Derived? Why don't you go swap the month and day while you're at it.
-
Why don't you go swap the month and day while you're at it.
because then sorting by asciibetical order wouldn't produce chronological order.
-
Derived? Why don't you go swap the month and day while you're at it.
DateSwapped_Date_Format extends Accalia_Date_Format extends ISO_Date_Format
Wait, I'm sure there's a
implements Abstract_Date_Format_Interface
I'm missing there. Or something.
-
DateSwapped_Date_Format extends Accalia_Date_Format extends ISO_Date_Format
I don't think you're supposed to mention the grandparent on the class declaration?
-
Did I say it was a declaration?
If it was a declaration, surely the word
class
would have been needed?
-
Normal: what everyone else appears to be that I refuse to allow to contaminate me.
My only regret is that I have but one like to give.
-
Another bug found! You don't need to thank me.
-
-
what about to RFC-2550?
-
I am not going to consider RFCs with that filing date in any serious manner.
-
you did notice that then.....
i'm also not conformant to that date format.
-
That's good. How about dates being troubled by the Y2K38 problem?
-
Y2K38 problem?
that should be interesting.....
will we have the y2k hype and fix everything in time, or will we not have much fanfare and a bunch of the embedded 32 bit systems fall over..... :-D
-
you did notice that then.....
Actually, I've read it before. April fools RFCs can be a fun read
if you've nothing better to do.
-
-
-
DateSwapped_Date_Format extends Accalia_Date_Format extends ISO_Date_Format
Wait, I'm sure there's a
implements Abstract_Date_Format_Interface
I'm missing there. Or something.Needs more XML.
-
Needs more XML.
Hey, I have enough WTF in my life already without adding to it with that
-
I'm sure there's some grounds for somewhere.
There's no
free spiritthe man is keeping me down badge.
-
will we have the y2k hype and fix everything in time, or will we not have much fanfare and a bunch of the embedded 32 bit systems fall over.....
My retirement plan, right there.
-
either way should be a lot of money for us geeky types.
-
-
-
-
The following example document is a sample of the JSON structure.
{ "name":"John Smith", "address": { "streetAddress": "21 2nd Street", "city": "New York", "state": "NY", "postalCode": 10021, }, "phoneNumbers": [ "212 555-1111", "212 555-2222" ], "additionalInfo": null, "remote": false, "height": 62.4, "ficoScore": " > 640" }
The following output is the result of the transformed document as JSONx.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <json:object xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.datapower.com/schemas/json jsonx.xsd" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:json="http://www.ibm.com/xmlns/prod/2009/jsonx"> <json:string name="name">John Smith</json:string> <json:object name="address"> <json:string name="streetAddress">21 2nd Street</json:string> <json:string name="city">New York</json:string> <json:string name="state">NY</json:string> <json:number name="postalCode">10021</json:number> </json:object> <json:array name="phoneNumbers"> <json:string>212 555-1111</json:string> <json:string>212 555-2222</json:string> </json:array> <json:null name="additionalInfo" /> <json:boolean name="remote">false</json:boolean> <json:number name="height">62.4</json:number> <json:string name="ficoScore"> > 640</json:string> </json:object>
FUUUUUUUUUUU
-
FUUUUUUUUUUU
FTFY
Also, that sample is delightful in the way it captures IBM's bloated nature. I'm sure the fact that they're laying off 100,000 people next month is a coincidence.