Spoiler alert....
-
Just testing spoilers....Move along. Nothing to read here.
Some people are concerned that global warming is going to create a resource war around the north pole with 5 countries heading the field of battle which are Norway, Russia, Canada, United States and Greenland. If we were to fold these counties into natural allies then we have:
[spoiler]Russia on one side; everyone else on the other.[/spoiler]
Russia has set down initial lines of demarcation with a land grab that has paled in comparison to anything previously seen by the cold war giant.
The governments of these 'concerned' countries are going to not only downplay the effects of global warming but flat out call it 'imaginary'. With 30% of the worlds natural gas tied up in this frozen world you can bet that the thinking of, "who controls the pipelines control the world" is going to be at the foremost thoughts of parties involved.
Norway has 15,000 soldiers and the other countries have a presence but it is unknown their troop counts. Russia has stated it has 1000s
-
-
Hmmm...
Russia on one side; everyone else on the other.
< span class = " spoiler " > Russia on one side; everyone else on the other. < / span >
Didn't work..
-
Well, I see a spoiler bbcode in the post that is not doing anything here on Chrome... he's not using the Chrome specific markup from the FAQs...
-
Chrome specific? ...sorry i am having a blonde moment at 5pm.
-
Absolutely no effect in FF either so... bust?
-
That would be a bust...
-
-
Just testing spoilers....Move along. Nothing to read here.
Some people are concerned that global warming is going to create a resource war around the north pole with 5 countries heading the field of battle which are Norway, Russia, Canada, United States and Greenland. If we were to fold these counties into natural allies then we have:
Russia on one side; everyone else on the other.
Russia has set down initial lines of demarcation with a land grab that has paled in comparison to anything previously seen by the cold war giant.The governments of these 'concerned' countries are going to not only downplay the effects of global warming but flat out call it 'imaginary'. With 30% of the worlds natural gas tied up in this frozen world you can bet that the thinking of, "who controls the pipelines control the world" is going to be at the foremost thoughts of parties involved.
Norway has 15,000 soldiers and the other countries have a presence but it is unknown their troop counts. Russia has stated it has 1000s.
Like in the FAQ (as referenced by @Onyx), it requires HTML and appears to only work in Chrome.
-
I can't remember how to look at the raw form of a post, but it doesn't look like the proper tag was used.
-
It's working fine for me in Chrome. Just one paragraph, though.
-
Oh sorry, I meant that the original wasn't (as they were talking about doing it as a span with a css class). Your version does do the collapsing properly.
-
There is an official Discourse spoiler plugin, it just needs to be installed here if you want it.
View it in action here:
https://meta.discourse.org/t/how-do-you-spoiler-an-image-or-onebox/55
-
@apapadimoulis let me know if you want it added and I will hook it up
-
You kidnapped that poor flightless wing! I hope that you will one day find it in your heart to release it to its home at a Honda Civic enthusiasts' forum.
-
I can't remember how to look at the raw form of a post
replace everything but the numbers with the word raw
-
@apapadimoulis let me know if you want it added and I will hook it up
In lieu of Alex replying, I'd say add it - it's been requested/mentioned a few times in various threads.
I can't remember how to look at the raw form of a post, but it doesn't look like the proper tag was used.
-
-
Why didn't that turn into this:
---
The [quote…] immediately below it interferes. Yet another “DC Markdown = TRWTF” bug.
-
DC Markbbcdownhtml = TRWTF
-
-
The [quote…] immediately below it interferes.
This.
I didn't even notice it didn't render as I intended...
-
@sam said:
@apapadimoulis let me know if you want it added and I will hook it up
In lieu of Alex replying, I'd say add it - it's been requested/mentioned a few times in various threads.Spoilers FAQ updated.
-
Could we have it so that on hover, title text appears saying something like "Spoiler, click to reveal."?
-
Could we have it so that on hover, title text appears saying something like "Spoiler, click to reveal."?
Do you write "Résumé" on top of your résumé?
Discourse features are intuitive and obviously done the right way.
They should not require clarifications.
-
-
Your not from around here, are you?
Filed under: Just kidding mate.
-
I say CV in my country too. I just don't write it on top of it because that's dumb.
-
I say CV in my country too. I just don't write it on top of it because that's dumb.
I write it across the top in big letters so I can make sure at a glance that I'm not sending a prospective employer my fresh vegetable mailing list catalogue.
-
I write it across the top in big letters so I can make sure at a glance that I'm not sending a prospective employer my fresh vegetable mailing list catalogue.
You should consider choosing a better picture of yourself.
-
-
Well, if the photo you've chosen evokes thoughts of fresh vegetables, perhaps it's not a very flattering picture.
Still better that a picture that reminds you of rotten vegetables, I guess.
-
My photo evokes the same feelings I get when end users get their hands on my beautiful, beautiful software that I've been crafting for months.
-
Disappointment? Nausea? Dread?
-
FFS you're actually going with 'fucking users' eyesight' as a spoiler technique?
I wonder if there's any way I can override that in CSS or failing that, user JavaScript.
-
Disappointment? Nausea? Dread?
I tend to go through all of the stages of grief.
Just this morning I had to correct lots of product pages on a website I made because the person who had added the products decided to duplicate their contact details in every product description. They recently left the business, leaving now obsolete contact details everywhere. I wouldn't mind if there wasn't already a phone number and contact form on every page as well as the facility to add a custom widget to the sidebar of every page.
-
FFS you're actually going with 'fucking users' eyesight' as a spoiler technique?
Do dropshadows freak out your eyes too?It's a shame you don't have glasses. If you could take them off, you'd be used to blurry shit.
-
No, dropshadows don't freak out my eyes, but that's because most drop shadows don't remove the hard edges from whichever side isn't being shadowed so I still have something to focus on properly.
-
FFS you're actually going with 'fucking users' eyesight' as a spoiler technique?
I wonder if there's any way I can override that in CSS or failing that, user JavaScript.
I just did this in Chrome devtools:
span.spoiled { color: black!important; text-shadow: none!important; background-color: black!important; } span.spoiled:hover { color: white!important; }
which doesn't work quite the same (hover to reveal instead of click) but on the plus side, it works by pure CSS and doesn't look like a blurry mess. You could even toggle visibility on click in javascript through the magic of changing the css class on the element instead of directly applying element style.
-
I had forgotten about !important, that should do the trick... in this case though it's not about fudging colours, it's about nuking the CSS that does blurring in the first place
-
I agree. Since it clears up a little on hover, I thought it was just fucked up at first and not working right. Then I decided to randomly click it. [spoiler]Hey it worked![/spoiler] Not very intuitive.
-
I just did the same, making it part of my custom stylesheet, but adding one extra piece:
cursor: auto !important;
, because a pointer is a much larger item than the I bar.I assume the reason it does inline styles instead of just styling the class is due to it being a plugin and not adding a stylesheet itself.
-
(And we have to do this on images in spoilers too, remember, it's not just text-shadow that needs to die in this case)
-
Since it clears up a little on hover, I thought it was just fucked up at first and not working right.
Same here. If it didn't do anything on hover other than show the pointer cursor, it would (perhaps ironically) be more discoverable.
-
-
Curriculum Vitaeæ
I'm relying on Discourse's tag-breaking quote behaviour to make it look like you said something completely wrong.
Filed under: Saving face.
-
Here you go:
span.spoiled img { visibility: hidden; } span.spoiled:hover img { visibility: visible; }
No more blur, and images are also hidden as part of the spoilers. Can probably change it to
*
instead ofimg
to hide everything, not just images.
-
That neutralises the CSS filter applied?
-
With a mix of mine and @hungrier's CSS, this is what you get:
On hover (with an emoji injected):
No terrible blur effect, and something that is a bit more obvious that it is hidden, and works entirely off of CSS, no JS needed.Oh, to note, my custom CSS also uses 'Segoe UI Symbol' for the font, so that's why that looks a bit off.
Here's the full CSS for that style of spoilers:
.spoiled { background-color: rgb(0,0,0) !important; color: rgb(0,0,0) !important; cursor: auto !important; text-shadow: none !important; } .spoiled * { filter: none; visibility: hidden; } .spoiled:hover { color: rgb(255,255,255) !important; } .spoiled:hover * { visibility: visible; }
Edit: Updated the CSS thanks to this post.
-
Test bed
[spoiler]Test Text[/spoiler]
[spoiler] [/spoiler]