Stack Exchange experiences Stack Meltdown, by enforcing preferred pronouns in site-wide communications
-
@boomzilla It's a term with a pretty well-understood meaning. But since he asked for a relevant quote, I posted:
The Ministry of Peace concerns itself with war, the Ministry of Truth with lies, the Ministry of Love with torture and the Ministry of Plenty with starvation. These contradictions are not accidental, nor do they result from from ordinary hypocrisy: they are deliberate exercises in doublethink.
Someone else responded with a comment along the lines of, "SE's Ministry of Inclusion concerns itself with divisiveness," but that got deleted. Hit a bit too close to home, I suppose.
BTW if anyone could flag the comment from TRiG as harassment/abuse, I'd greatly appreciate it. The guy's a long-time troll from the site I moderate who's spent years causing trouble and getting into trouble for essentially trying to redefine Christianity.SE as Atheism.SE, and he's just making a personal attack here. But if I were the one to flag him it would look bad.
-
@Mason_Wheeler said in Stack Exchange experiences Stack Meltdown, by enforcing preferred pronouns in site-wide communications:
It's a term with a pretty well-understood meaning. But since he asked for a relevant quote, I posted:
Yeah, I saw that, but I thought it was important to call out shog9 as the dickhole that he is.
-
@boomzilla How does linking to his profile establish that, rather than linking to specific posts that show examples of bad behavior?
-
This post is deleted!
-
@Mason_Wheeler said in Stack Exchange experiences Stack Meltdown, by enforcing preferred pronouns in site-wide communications:
@boomzilla How does linking to his profile establish that, rather than linking to specific posts that show examples of bad behavior?
Shog9 has been the butt of
SESO for at least... 9 years? He was the one behind the ban on -1 in comments, and that ban was before SE was even a thing.
-
@Mason_Wheeler said in Stack Exchange experiences Stack Meltdown, by enforcing preferred pronouns in site-wide communications:
@boomzilla How does linking to his profile establish that, rather than linking to specific posts that show examples of bad behavior?
It's my own little google bombing campaign for humorous effect.
-
@_P_ said in Stack Exchange experiences Stack Meltdown, by enforcing preferred pronouns in site-wide communications:
@levicki said in Stack Exchange experiences Stack Meltdown, by enforcing preferred pronouns in site-wide communications:
What if someone is gender fluid and wants to be addressed as he in the morning, hir in the afternoon, and she in the evening? How far do we as a society go to accomodate such nonsense, wait, no, madness, and how much deeper down into this particular rabbit hole we need to fall before realizing that there are only Mad Hatter and the Queen of Hearts waiting for us in there?
I think this is the only time where the use of deep learning AI to facilitate moderation is justified, because even AIs can't fuck up pronouns more so than we do right now.
(yeah, I saw , but still ) I can't help but think about those poor AIs that people corrupted so quickly that they had to be taken offline...
-
@dcon said in Stack Exchange experiences Stack Meltdown, by enforcing preferred pronouns in site-wide communications:
@_P_ said in Stack Exchange experiences Stack Meltdown, by enforcing preferred pronouns in site-wide communications:
@levicki said in Stack Exchange experiences Stack Meltdown, by enforcing preferred pronouns in site-wide communications:
What if someone is gender fluid and wants to be addressed as he in the morning, hir in the afternoon, and she in the evening? How far do we as a society go to accomodate such nonsense, wait, no, madness, and how much deeper down into this particular rabbit hole we need to fall before realizing that there are only Mad Hatter and the Queen of Hearts waiting for us in there?
I think this is the only time where the use of deep learning AI to facilitate moderation is justified, because even AIs can't fuck up pronouns more so than we do right now.
(yeah, I saw , but still ) I can't help but think about those poor AIs that people corrupted so quickly that they had to be taken offline...
We should train a bot on tdwtf, and then let it loose on the wider world. For instance SE/SO.
-
@Mason_Wheeler said in Stack Exchange experiences Stack Meltdown, by enforcing preferred pronouns in site-wide communications:
BTW if anyone could flag the comment from TRiG as harassment/abuse, I'd greatly appreciate it. The guy's a long-time troll from the site I moderate who's spent years causing trouble and getting into trouble for essentially trying to redefine Christianity.SE as Atheism.SE, and he's just making a personal attack here. But if I were the one to flag him it would look bad.
Woah, you got people holding a grudge and then you got people who are weaponizing it like TRiG:
One reading: Well, yes, intolerant people like yourself are unwelcome here. That's precisely what it's saying. You're reading it correctly.
Flagged.
-
@Mason_Wheeler said in Stack Exchange experiences Stack Meltdown, by enforcing preferred pronouns in site-wide communications:
BTW if anyone could flag the comment from TRiG as harassment/abuse, I'd greatly appreciate it. The guy's a long-time troll from the site I moderate who's spent years causing trouble and getting into trouble for essentially trying to redefine Christianity.SE as Atheism.SE, and he's just making a personal attack here. But if I were the one to flag him it would look bad.
I get what you're saying, but I think he's accurately representing the SO/SE management's position here:
"One reading: Well, yes, intolerant people like yourself are unwelcome here. That's precisely what it's saying. You're reading it correctly. β TRiG 5 hours ago"
-
@Carnage said in Stack Exchange experiences Stack Meltdown, by enforcing preferred pronouns in site-wide communications:
We should train a bot on tdwtf, and then let it loose on the wider world. For instance SE/SO.
@error_bot gif listening
-
-
@boomzilla Nah, Shog is solid. I wasn't a fan of that particular comment either, but he is by far the best of the CM team and a voice for moderation and reason.
-
@boomzilla said in Stack Exchange experiences Stack Meltdown, by enforcing preferred pronouns in site-wide communications:
@Mason_Wheeler said in Stack Exchange experiences Stack Meltdown, by enforcing preferred pronouns in site-wide communications:
BTW if anyone could flag the comment from TRiG as harassment/abuse, I'd greatly appreciate it. The guy's a long-time troll from the site I moderate who's spent years causing trouble and getting into trouble for essentially trying to redefine Christianity.SE as Atheism.SE, and he's just making a personal attack here. But if I were the one to flag him it would look bad.
I get what you're saying, but I think he's accurately representing the SO/SE management's position here: [...]
It's the part which I emphasized here which would be violating their own "Be nice" policy:
intolerant people like yourself
No need to include those barbs, that's what the WTDWTF Garage or 4chan is for.
-
@Mason_Wheeler I am still blown away by the fact that the proposal explicitly doesn't allows those who object to using people's preferred pronouns to simply avoid pronouns altogether by sticking to names, but it does allow them to just refuse to talk to or about trans people altogether. (This point was explicitly clarified by the staff in the comments.) Seriously, what the fuck? The net effect of this proposal is just to ban a bunch of religious people or those who otherwise object to unusual pronouns from talking to trans people; are trans people meant to be pleased about that?
Naturally, pointing this out draws a whole load of lefty nonsense about how disagreeing about whether a transman should be viewed as male is "hateful" and "intolerant" and "denying their existence". Never mind actually addressing the point that this policy punishes trans people for being trans by compelling people not to interact with them; the only issue that matters is that it hurts people the progs don't like, and if you don't approve of hurting people the progs don't like, you're a bigot.
-
@JBert said in Stack Exchange experiences Stack Meltdown, by enforcing preferred pronouns in site-wide communications:
@boomzilla said in Stack Exchange experiences Stack Meltdown, by enforcing preferred pronouns in site-wide communications:
@Mason_Wheeler said in Stack Exchange experiences Stack Meltdown, by enforcing preferred pronouns in site-wide communications:
BTW if anyone could flag the comment from TRiG as harassment/abuse, I'd greatly appreciate it. The guy's a long-time troll from the site I moderate who's spent years causing trouble and getting into trouble for essentially trying to redefine Christianity.SE as Atheism.SE, and he's just making a personal attack here. But if I were the one to flag him it would look bad.
I get what you're saying, but I think he's accurately representing the SO/SE management's position here: [...]
It's the part which I emphasized here which would be violating their own "Be nice" policy:
intolerant people like yourself
No need to include those barbs, that's what the WTDWTF Garage or 4chan is for.
I could see that if that was on some arbitrary SE thing, but his comment is perfectly germane to the actual discussion at hand. He's pointing out that he believes that @Mason_Wheeler is the one not being nice in direct contradiction to that exact policy in Mason's objection to the policy. At least, that's how the comment reads to me, who hasn't witnessed the history between the two elsewhere.
-
@Cabbage said in Stack Exchange experiences Stack Meltdown, by enforcing preferred pronouns in site-wide communications:
@Mason_Wheeler I am still blown away by the fact that the proposal explicitly doesn't allows those who object to using people's preferred pronouns to simply avoid pronouns altogether by sticking to names, but it does allow them to just refuse to talk to or about trans people altogether. (This point was explicitly clarified by the staff in the comments.) Seriously, what the fuck? The net effect of this proposal is just to ban a bunch of religious people or those who otherwise object to unusual pronouns from talking to trans people;
Yeah, pretty much, which I specifically pointed out as problematic in my post.
are trans people meant to be pleased about that?
Looks like it, yeah. (No intended. Do we have a :sincere: emoji?)
Naturally, pointing this out draws a whole load of lefty nonsense about how disagreeing about whether a transman should be viewed as male is "hateful" and "intolerant" and "denying their existence". Never mind actually addressing the point that this policy punishes trans people for being trans by compelling people not to interact with them; the only issue that matters is that it hurts people the progs don't like, and if you don't approve of hurting people the progs don't like, you're a bigot.
Wait, are you expecting ideologically-driven political positions to make sense or something?
-
@boomzilla said in Stack Exchange experiences Stack Meltdown, by enforcing preferred pronouns in site-wide communications:
I could see that if that was on some arbitrary SE thing, but his comment is perfectly germane to the actual discussion at hand. He's pointing out that he believes that @Mason_Wheeler is the one not being nice in direct contradiction to that exact policy in Mason's objection to the policy. At least, that's how the comment reads to me, who hasn't witnessed the history between the two elsewhere.
Yes, one of the best trolling tactics is crafting your words to appear reasonable to an outside observer who is missing the context. (I'm sure you're familiar with this one, from your years on this forum.)
-
@Mason_Wheeler said in Stack Exchange experiences Stack Meltdown, by enforcing preferred pronouns in site-wide communications:
@boomzilla said in Stack Exchange experiences Stack Meltdown, by enforcing preferred pronouns in site-wide communications:
I could see that if that was on some arbitrary SE thing, but his comment is perfectly germane to the actual discussion at hand. He's pointing out that he believes that @Mason_Wheeler is the one not being nice in direct contradiction to that exact policy in Mason's objection to the policy. At least, that's how the comment reads to me, who hasn't witnessed the history between the two elsewhere.
Yes, one of the best trolling tactics is crafting your words to appear reasonable to an outside observer who is missing the context. (I'm sure you're familiar with this one, from your years on this forum.)
Sure. Nevertheless, I don't see any light between his comment and management.
-
@Cabbage said in Stack Exchange experiences Stack Meltdown, by enforcing preferred pronouns in site-wide communications:
@Mason_Wheeler I am still blown away by the fact that the proposal explicitly doesn't allows those who object to using people's preferred pronouns to simply avoid pronouns altogether by sticking to names, but it does allow them to just refuse to talk to or about trans people altogether.
Yup. To me, from a totally outside and uninterested position, this looks ο .
That you want people to not mis-label others (i.e. use a specific pronoun when the person has stated another pronoun) is basic courtesy and pretty normal. Repeatedly using "he" when talking to someone known as a woman would rightly be seen by everyone as being a dick.
But saying that someone who, for any reason that is their own, does not want to use a pronoun and uses some slightly contorted phrasing instead, is Not Welcome Here, well, that's really awful.
The worst (well, one of the worst?) part about those rules is that, by explicitly forbidding the use of alternative phrasing, it makes all phrasing that does not explicitly uses pronouns as suspect! (Q11, and Q12 doesn't really help alleviate it)
"Oh, you used
username
in this perfectly normal sentence, now we're going to have to look into your head to know if that was your intent from the start or if you initially wanted to use[pronoun]
but decided not to."So, do you want to snare them in their own trap? Flag all comments/answers saying something like "
username
answer is incorrect because such and such" as violating Q11 and suggest rewriting it as "Their answer etc.". Hey, not your fault it's now impossible to understand who is being referred to! It says right here on yourcockCoC that "avoiding using someoneβs pronouns is a violation"!
-
@remi is really that common sense are lost in lots of people nowadays, so you cannot just say "use common sense" and expect people to, well, use common sense and not do absurd stuff. "be nice" used by SO or "don't be a dick" used by reddit/discord aren't valid alternatives by any stretch, because the former has always been patronizing, and the latter is mainly used to maintain the comfort zone of fragile young teens.
Like, anyone with common sense would know the concept of de-escalation and tell you how to handle preferred pronouns in a sensible way that doesn't cause massive drama. But nope, some people really like to be adversarial s and ruin stuff for everyone. I really hope AIs can obsolete these people before anything else, so they lose their purpose in life and stop doing these pointless shit.
-
@_P_ said in Stack Exchange experiences Stack Meltdown, by enforcing preferred pronouns in site-wide communications:
@remi is really that common sense are lost in lots of people nowadays, so you cannot just say "use common sense" and expect people to, well, use common sense and not do absurd stuff.
Meh. I mean, I agree with you, except for the "nowadays" part. I don't know how's your , but as far as I remember (up to Usenet in my case), "common sense" and "large online communities" have always been disjoint sets.
Which, if you remember, was one the main motivation of when he started . You know, civilized discourse and so on. It was a nice idea to try and attack that problem, although it was either pure ignorance or pure hubris (inb4: why not both) to first believe that he could really solve human nature and then to believe he could achieve that with a purely technical solution. But I'm digressing.
-
@remi said in Stack Exchange experiences Stack Meltdown, by enforcing preferred pronouns in site-wide communications:
but as far as I remember (up to Usenet in my case), "common sense" and "large online communities" have always been disjoint sets.
Back in the days there's the notion of "conversion" and the concept that eternal September is caused by, well, new people being new (hence needs to be converted). Now look at how SE handles the same thing by inventing the hypothetical "new contributor" archetype, blaming the existing community for the ubiquitous, inevitable friction instead. Or all the attempts to brand any negative thing as "trolls are trolling!!!11!" and start calling names at the nothingness, which spreads as far as a big part of Twitter.
Also, as far as I can see, most people have stopped even trying to make sense. How to combat some highly vocal idiot sprouting complete nonsense on the Internet? Try to argue back? Nope that's not gonna work. Try to ask mods/admins to act on it? Now they'll be yelling at you for trying to "censor the free internet". The best course of action is to turn their absurd paragraphs into copypasta and meme it for the rest of the decade. It has never been so chaotic, that you need an entirely different paradigm of interpersonal interaction to stay afloat.
@remi said in Stack Exchange experiences Stack Meltdown, by enforcing preferred pronouns in site-wide communications:
to first believe that he could really solve human nature and then to believe he could achieve that with a purely technical solution
Wait, you mean 's motivation for creating isn't for holding the record for the worse forum software human has ever known? (Though I guess you can't surpass CS or Discuz, that Chinese forum software that got bought by Tencent. They're of s. failed at being )
-
-
@_P_ said in Stack Exchange experiences Stack Meltdown, by enforcing preferred pronouns in site-wide communications:
@remi said in Stack Exchange experiences Stack Meltdown, by enforcing preferred pronouns in site-wide communications:
but as far as I remember (up to Usenet in my case), "common sense" and "large online communities" have always been disjoint sets.
Back in the days there's the notion of "conversion" and the concept that eternal September is caused by, well, new people being new (hence needs to be converted).
Well see how well it worked (eternal September), and see how aware people were already of how well it worked (the fact that the expression "eternal September" exists).
Also, as far as I can see, most people have stopped even trying to make sense. How to combat some highly vocal idiot sprouting complete nonsense on the Internet? Try to argue back? Nope that's not gonna work; the best course of action is to turn their absurd paragraphs into copypasta and meme it for the rest of the decade.
Again, nothing new. Sure, communities were not as large, nor as fluidly interacting (e.g. between various social medias), memes were not known by that name and there weren't any lolcat. But that's just cosmetic, it doesn't change that there were trolls before the word existed, and lengthy recipes of how you should deal with them (in short: whichever way you want, it won't work) and so on.
-
@remi Again, my point is even for a -infested place such as Usenet and news groups, it was a relatively tiny part of the internet back then. It wasn't monopolizing. And anon boards? They're most underground; only the people who heard about it would know such places exist. Most people just run their IRCs or use something like ICQ/AOL/MSN and it was relatively peaceful.
Now with Facebook and Twitter you've unleashed the -es to basically everyone in the world, even the average Joes. And they can all contribute to the problem! Meanwhile, for most ecosystems it's been dominated by a handful of big outlets so you basically can't avoid getting involved into one of them. (Trying to avoid them altogether is the real .) You don't have a choice here.
-
@Carnage said in Stack Exchange experiences Stack Meltdown, by enforcing preferred pronouns in site-wide communications:
@dcon said in Stack Exchange experiences Stack Meltdown, by enforcing preferred pronouns in site-wide communications:
@_P_ said in Stack Exchange experiences Stack Meltdown, by enforcing preferred pronouns in site-wide communications:
@levicki said in Stack Exchange experiences Stack Meltdown, by enforcing preferred pronouns in site-wide communications:
What if someone is gender fluid and wants to be addressed as he in the morning, hir in the afternoon, and she in the evening? How far do we as a society go to accomodate such nonsense, wait, no, madness, and how much deeper down into this particular rabbit hole we need to fall before realizing that there are only Mad Hatter and the Queen of Hearts waiting for us in there?
I think this is the only time where the use of deep learning AI to facilitate moderation is justified, because even AIs can't fuck up pronouns more so than we do right now.
(yeah, I saw , but still ) I can't help but think about those poor AIs that people corrupted so quickly that they had to be taken offline...
We should train a bot on tdwtf, and then let it loose on the wider world. For instance SE/SO.
It wouldn't have to train very much, just answer "TDEMSYR" on every post until it gets banned
-
@hungrier said in Stack Exchange experiences Stack Meltdown, by enforcing preferred pronouns in site-wide communications:
@Carnage said in Stack Exchange experiences Stack Meltdown, by enforcing preferred pronouns in site-wide communications:
@dcon said in Stack Exchange experiences Stack Meltdown, by enforcing preferred pronouns in site-wide communications:
@_P_ said in Stack Exchange experiences Stack Meltdown, by enforcing preferred pronouns in site-wide communications:
@levicki said in Stack Exchange experiences Stack Meltdown, by enforcing preferred pronouns in site-wide communications:
What if someone is gender fluid and wants to be addressed as he in the morning, hir in the afternoon, and she in the evening? How far do we as a society go to accomodate such nonsense, wait, no, madness, and how much deeper down into this particular rabbit hole we need to fall before realizing that there are only Mad Hatter and the Queen of Hearts waiting for us in there?
I think this is the only time where the use of deep learning AI to facilitate moderation is justified, because even AIs can't fuck up pronouns more so than we do right now.
(yeah, I saw , but still ) I can't help but think about those poor AIs that people corrupted so quickly that they had to be taken offline...
We should train a bot on tdwtf, and then let it loose on the wider world. For instance SE/SO.
It wouldn't have to train very much, just answer "TDEMSYR" on every post until it gets banned
That's a very low-hanging troll. At this rate you might as well just DDoS SE/SO with a botnet instead
-
Linked from that thread somewhere, this seems like a balanced answer I can get behind:
-
@topspin 6 hours ago, though maybe I should have just let it one-box like you just did.
-
@JBert said in Stack Exchange experiences Stack Meltdown, by enforcing preferred pronouns in site-wide communications:
@topspin 6 hours ago, though maybe I should have just let it one-box like you just did.
Oh, true, I didn't click that link. Guess I wanted to and forgot...
-
@_P_ I have to ask: This mythical "common sense", did that actually ever exist?
Birds of a feather flock together, but opposites also attract. Two minds are better than one, except when too many cooks spoil the broth. Does absence make the heart grow fonder, or is out of sight out of mind? At what point does try, try again turn into flogging a dead horse? And if experience is the best teacher, when should one also maintain a beginnerβs mind?
-
@Rhywden Common sense is remarkably uncommon.
-
@PleegWat said in Stack Exchange experiences Stack Meltdown, by enforcing preferred pronouns in site-wide communications:
@Rhywden Common sense is remarkably uncommon.
Yeah, that's just common sense!
-
@Rhywden said in Stack Exchange experiences Stack Meltdown, by enforcing preferred pronouns in site-wide communications:
-
@Mason_Wheeler said in Stack Exchange experiences Stack Meltdown, by enforcing preferred pronouns in site-wide communications:
Well, that's the fastest by far that I've ever gotten to 100 points on a answer. Even with more downvotes than I've ever received, people have consistently been supporting my answer more than those who disagree by a factor of about 6:1.
TIL the fastest way to farm Internet pointzzz is to post on highly controversial threads.
-
From 2009:
I've explained Stack Overflow to hundreds of people, and by far the most effective way to explain what we do -- the way that causes people to visibly "get it" almost instantly, with a giant cartoon lightbulb practically appearing over their head -- is this:
"We're like experts-exchange, but without all the evil."
Experts-exchange was about 12 years old when SO was founded to be an evil-free alternative to it.
SO is about 11 years old right now...
-
Evil and profitable are largely synonymous.
-
@Mason_Wheeler BRB, registering stackoverflowbutnotafuckpileofshit.com
-
@hungrier How about stackdiscourse.com?
-
@Unperverted-Vixen said in Stack Exchange experiences Stack Meltdown, by enforcing preferred pronouns in site-wide communications:
@hungrier How about stackdiscourse.com?
He said not a pile of shit.
-
@remi said in Stack Exchange experiences Stack Meltdown, by enforcing preferred pronouns in site-wide communications:
@_P_ said in Stack Exchange experiences Stack Meltdown, by enforcing preferred pronouns in site-wide communications:
@remi is really that common sense are lost in lots of people nowadays, so you cannot just say "use common sense" and expect people to, well, use common sense and not do absurd stuff.
Meh. I mean, I agree with you, except for the "nowadays" part. I don't know how's your , but as far as I remember (up to Usenet in my case), "common sense" and "large online communities" have always been disjoint sets.
Which, if you remember, was one the main motivation of when he started . You know, civilized discourse and so on. It was a nice idea to try and attack that problem, although it was either pure ignorance or pure hubris (inb4: why not both) to first believe that he could really solve human nature and then to believe he could achieve that with a purely technical solution. But I'm digressing.
If there was any technical solution that would solve that, though, it'd be Discourse.
-
@Mason_Wheeler and now they have problems with sexchanges again, it comes full circle.
-
@error said in Stack Exchange experiences Stack Meltdown, by enforcing preferred pronouns in site-wide communications:
@Mason_Wheeler said in Stack Exchange experiences Stack Meltdown, by enforcing preferred pronouns in site-wide communications:
Well, that's the fastest by far that I've ever gotten to 100 points on a answer. Even with more downvotes than I've ever received, people have consistently been supporting my answer more than those who disagree by a factor of about 6:1.
TIL the fastest way to farm Internet pointzzz is to post on highly controversial threads.
Meh. It's not particularly controversial. People are overwhelmingly in agreement, both that the new policy is wrong and why it's wrong. I'm just the one who finally came out and said what everyone's been thinking.
-
@Mason_Wheeler said in Stack Exchange experiences Stack Meltdown, by enforcing preferred pronouns in site-wide communications:
Well, that's the fastest by far that I've ever gotten to 100 points on a answer. Even with more downvotes than I've ever received, people have consistently been supporting my answer more than those who disagree by a factor of about 6:1.
Alas, I do not have enough Internet Points to matter on Meta but I threw in some votes anyway. What a .
-
@levicki said in Stack Exchange experiences Stack Meltdown, by enforcing preferred pronouns in site-wide communications:
@hungrier said in Stack Exchange experiences Stack Meltdown, by enforcing preferred pronouns in site-wide communications:
@Mason_Wheeler BRB, registering stackoverflowbutnotafuckpileofshit.com
Why, is gender.exchange already taken?
programmersexchange ?
-
@levicki said in Stack Exchange experiences Stack Meltdown, by enforcing preferred pronouns in site-wide communications:
@hungrier said in Stack Exchange experiences Stack Meltdown, by enforcing preferred pronouns in site-wide communications:
@Mason_Wheeler BRB, registering stackoverflowbutnotafuckpileofshit.com
Why, is gender.exchange already taken?
If it is, you can still go and register copynpasteheaven.com.
-
@JBert said in Stack Exchange experiences Stack Meltdown, by enforcing preferred pronouns in site-wide communications:
@levicki said in Stack Exchange experiences Stack Meltdown, by enforcing preferred pronouns in site-wide communications:
@hungrier said in Stack Exchange experiences Stack Meltdown, by enforcing preferred pronouns in site-wide communications:
@Mason_Wheeler BRB, registering stackoverflowbutnotafuckpileofshit.com
Why, is gender.exchange already taken?
If it is, you can still go and register copynpasteheaven.com.
sendmethecodes.com
-
@_P_ Also @error_bot xkcd Drama
-
@aitap said in Stack Exchange experiences Stack Meltdown, by enforcing preferred pronouns in site-wide communications:
@_P_ Also @error_bot xkcd Drama
That gets parsed as base "also" with 3 parameters.