You don't have any right if you help copyright violation
-
@boomzilla said in You don't have any right if you help copyright violation:
@rhywden said in You don't have any right if you help copyright violation:
@asdf Has the moron in question still not figured out that I literally cannot read his posts anymore?
It'sHe's made you into kind of a running gag, in fact.FTFY
-
@masonwheeler said in You don't have any right if you help copyright violation:
@boomzilla said in You don't have any right if you help copyright violation:
@rhywden said in You don't have any right if you help copyright violation:
@asdf Has the moron in question still not figured out that I literally cannot read his posts anymore?
It'sHe's made you into kind of a running gag, in fact.FTFY
Nah, @Rhywden did that to himself.
-
@timebandit said in You don't have any right if you help copyright violation:
I hope he's gonna sue them into Oblivion.
Why? What good will be served by sending his tormentors to Tamriel?
-
@groaner They'll be devoured by Daedra and be out of his hair forever, obviously.
-
@timebandit said in You don't have any right if you help copyright violation:
@asdf said in You don't have any right if you help copyright violation:
In Germany, they just passed a law that allows the police to force "witnesses" to testify without a judge's order.
Germany is becoming a
Nazitotalitarian state ?Most of the western world has been swinging that way for awhile.
-
@benjamin-hall said in You don't have any right if you help copyright violation:
What you're describing are non-precidental decisions (either due to jurisdiction or the nature of the decision). Those are persuasive but not binding.
Exactly that. Such works of jurisprudence are never binding, yes, but can be extremely persuasive. They're the sort of thing that superior courts tend to pay quite a lot of attention to (and yes, that definitely includes supreme courts).
-
@dkf here the persuasiveness varies by court. For example, the 9th circuit (most of the West coast) tends to be super liberal and it shows. They get reversed a lot and most other circuits disagree on a lot of things. Same with the 6th (I think?) on death penalty cases. They make decisions, everyone else ignores them, the Supremes overturn them.
State courts have even less respect for other states decisions, since the underlying law is often quite different.