The official unperson thread
-
Did you ever see a user pop up, post some questionable but not quite spambot-level topics, maybe make a request to join ClubDed, and then get banned with all their posts deleted?
This is the topic to commemorate these fallen heroes.
I'll start:
sammy76
Posted a couple probably-awful videos in funny stuff and made a request to join ClubDed
He will be remembered.
-
@ben_lubar @julianlam these shouldn't polute the mention auto-complete list
-
@wharrgarbl You will deny them even that much?!
-
@CreatedToDislikeThis said in The official unperson thread:
@wharrgarbl You will deny them even that much?!
Externally enforced "Right to be forgotten"? that reminds me of @fbmac..... he'd love that concept.
-
@accalia Current mention auto-complete is terrible because thousands of spammers. I would filter out anyone that wasn't active for a year or is banned.
-
or 3 months instead of a year
-
@CreatedToDislikeThis Personally, I see no reason to have banned users in the autocomplete. After all, why mention a user who cannot possibly respond to it?
-
@RaceProUK because @end is a funny guy to mention
-
@wharrgarbl said in The official unperson thread:
@accalia Current mention auto-complete is terrible because thousands of spammers. I would filter out anyone that wasn't active for a year or is banned.
you keep reminding me of @fbmac..... the resemblence is uncanny.....
-
@wharrgarbl said in The official unperson thread:
or 3 months instead of a year
oooooooooooooooooooor....... how about we simply reorder the results so that instead of alphabetical results we get results in order of most recent post ? that way active people bubble to the top and inactive people are still accessible.
-
So you can get used to mentioning an active poster with just the first few letters of his name ... right until some inactive poster makes a post and causes you to mismention?
Perhaps if it was a more consistent "activity" score that was used for sorting, though...
-
@CreatedToDislikeThis I like my idea better
-
@CreatedToDislikeThis Maybe it should trigger a Javascript alert if it thinks you're mentioning the wrong person
-
@hungrier it's you that are triggering me here with this
-
@CreatedToDislikeThis said in The official unperson thread:
So you can get used to mentioning an active poster with just the first few letters of his name ... right until some inactive poster makes a post and causes you to mismention?
Perhaps if it was a more consistent "activity" score that was used for sorting, though...
i'm assuming that it wouldn't resort once displayed, so that you'd have to type another letter to get it to re-search and re-order...... because changing the order of a select box while the user is interacting with it is a dick move.
-
@wharrgarbl said in The official unperson thread:
@hungrier it's you that are triggering me here with this
YMBNH
-
@accalia He is talking about muscle memory, imagine he is used to type acc to mention you, and 1 hour later he call @Accasuka by mistake.
-
@wharrgarbl said in The official unperson thread:
nobody wants to invite the wrong type of perverted people to a party.
E_DOES_NOT_COMPUTE
there are no wrong kinds of perverted people.
there a regular people, perverts, assholes, and perverted assholes. you don't want either of the last two categories at your party, but in the case of the perverted assholes it is NOT because of their pervert side.
-
@Perverted_Vixen said in The official unperson thread:
there a regular people, perverts, assholes, and perverted assholes
No, there are dicks, pussies and assholes. Dicks fuck pussies, but dicks also sometimes fuck assholed
-
@Jaloopa Because if dicks didn't fuck assholes, you'd end up covered in shit. Or something.
I need to rewatch Team America.
-
@RaceProUK if I wasn't at work I'd have posted the entire transcript or the video
-
This post is deleted!
-
@wharrgarbl said in The official unperson thread:
@Perverted_Vixen said in The official unperson thread:
there are no wrong kinds of perverted people.
Imagine you're not into BDSM and you only realized you invited the wrong pervert​ that really loves it. Both would be disappointed.
Why wouldn't they discuss and find a perversion they both share, then enjoy that?
-
@Jaloopa said in The official unperson thread:
@Perverted_Vixen said in The official unperson thread:
there a regular people, perverts, assholes, and perverted assholes
No, there are dicks, pussies and assholes. Dicks fuck pussies, but dicks also sometimes fuck assholed
Well.... if that's the case..... i'll get my harness and join in the fun.
-
@wharrgarbl said in The official unperson thread:
Imagine you're not into BDSM and you invited the wrong pervert​ that really loves it. Both would be disappointed.
If that mismatch occurred and conversation and consent was not a part of the prefestivities discussion then the pervert who was into BDSM was not a pervert but a perverted asshole.
so they already don't fall into the right category to be invited, and again it's not because of the perversity but rather the assholishness
-
This post is deleted!
-
@wharrgarbl said in The official unperson thread:
@RaceProUK said in The official unperson thread:
Why wouldn't they discuss and find a perversion they both share, then enjoy that?
Imagine you already​ discussed and you both are very happy with your planned perverted activities, and at last moment you mismention and invited the wrong pervert.
Then we'd have unperverted sex. Or go see a movie.
-
This post is deleted!
-
@Jaloopa said in The official unperson thread:
@RaceProUK if I wasn't at work I'd have posted the entire transcript or the video
We're dicks! We're reckless, arrogant, stupid dicks. And the Film Actors Guild are pussies. And Kim Jong-il is an asshole. Pussies don't like dicks, because pussies get fucked by dicks. But dicks also fuck assholes - assholes who just want to shit on everything. Pussies may think they can deal with assholes their way, but the only thing that can fuck an asshole is a dick, with some balls. The problem with dicks is that sometimes they fuck too much, or fuck when it isn't appropriate - and it takes a pussy to show 'em that. But sometimes pussies get so full of shit that they become assholes themselves, because pussies are only an inch-and-a-half away from assholes. I don't know much in this crazy, crazy world, but I do know that if you don't let us fuck this asshole, we are going to have our dicks and our pussies all covered in shit
You had me at dicks fuck assholes
-
@accalia said in The official unperson thread:
we get results in order of most recent post
How would that work on an active forum?
-
@aliceif said in The official unperson thread:
@accalia said in The official unperson thread:
we get results in order of most recent post
How would that work on an active forum?
/shrug iunno. i'm not the one implementing the feature.
-
@wharrgarbl said in The official unperson thread:
@CreatedToDislikeThis I like my idea better
Of course, if you hated your own ideas you'd tend to stop having them, no?
-
Maybe it could just rate banned/inactive users lower for fuzzy matching. Or maybe some overly complicated scheme where number of recent @ mentions count towards activity for the purposes of the list order.
Possibly exact matches still show first regardless of the account's status.
-
@coderpatsy that would lock @mikeTheLiar and @darkmatter at the top