I can repro. I went to start a new topic which open maximized then minimized and discarded the post. Clicked reply to this thread and well.
Firefox Desktop.
I can repro. I went to start a new topic which open maximized then minimized and discarded the post. Clicked reply to this thread and well.
Firefox Desktop.
Not that Das Boot. Dis Das Boot:
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=Beer Fest Das Boot
Also featuring JΓΌrgen Prochnow.
Just because I've never seen a German eat a giant bratwurst, sour kraut and drink beer from Das Boot for breakfast doesn't mean it hasn't happened.
Status: Mentally prepping should Discourse become sentient during the NodeBB migration.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=piLwaJKQGkA&list=PL3869705E628905B1
Status: I think one of my cats pulled a Donnie Darko. I heard breathing next to me, looked over and no cat to be found. Or maybe this is a reason to leave all the lights on when you have two black cats.
Status: Got the spare parts for my toy at work. Now just need get a copy of third-party software prototype and do some QA banging on it.
Whatever the number is when they stop preventing the kindergartner from stealing a swig of said beer/wine and/or the point that the kidergartner tucks THEM into bed.
I thought I was making fun of people that can't tell the difference between forwards and backwards compatibility? I must have swooshed.
away folks!
WTF is WRONG with our industry?! o_OBackwards compatibility and lazy people.
I saw this and ran-with-it.
Typical fucking pedant-. Ruining jokes since 1925.
So this:
[spoiler]
[/spoiler]
I have no idea but I think it would make a better love story than Twilight.
What if his/her/zirs kink is shaming a shame. Now we have a recursive shame-ception.
You want shame-ception? This is how you get shame-ception.
Are you attempting to kink-shame @Polygeekery? For shame!
Sadly I'll take 95% backwards compatibility to:
"Why old-thing no understand new-thing protocol?" : "That is called forwards compatibility" : "Me no understand, if old and new thing talk must be backwards compatibility!" : "That's bizzaro-world compatibility but whatever..."
I didn't say anything about watching what the cameras record. That's what government grants and interns/grad students are for.
Shh they might notice us setting up the cameras. Uh I mean...ignore the behind the curtain.
Is this thread Guacamole 2.0? I don't want to shit it up with too soon.
Lorne will be 10 years late for a 4/5/6 joke.
East Coast. It might have just been because the store was an older model but I'd feel better getting "fresh" sushi at a Sheetz than that particular store.
Safeway sushi just isn't the same.
Last time I went into a Safeway it made Food Lion look like Trader Joes. So I guess if you didn't get food poisoning from that sushi "high-five"?
Double entendres are child's play. I go for the aleph-1 entendres. I do have to give credit to @ChrisH for source material.
If they ever get to 2.0 that will be the flagshit release.
To be fair, Discourse is a business success
Let's do some bar napkin finances!
https://www.discourse.org/faq/customers/ - Lists 27 customers we can reasonably assume are paying the $1K a month Discourse tithe. Let's be generous and round up to 50.
$600K annual gross revenue.
They are up to 9 FTE, let's say average cost of $80K per annum. $720K in employee costs.
That leaves a grand whopping -$120K in net revenue.
You really think the VCs that gave that starter money aren't riding him like a ?
That's still pretty expensive for SPANK SPANK BITCH COMPLAIN driven development though.
Holy fucking hell. Mr. English should consider changing his name to Mr. Blonde. He sounds like a true psychopath and/or the next Unibomber in the making.
Status: Watching Home Alone and just realized a 'hydabed' is a 'hide-a-bed'. I have been TR for 20+ years.
Edit: I'll fix the gif later. Mobile-first my ass
Fucking fuck Discourae ed me
That's looks too much like M/MUMPS for comfort...
As long as you have .NET 3.0 something like below should work. Haven't tested cause that sounds like work.
Add-Type -AssemblyName System.DirectoryServices.AccountManagement
$email = [System.DirectoryServices.AccountManagement.UserPrincipal]::Current.EmailAddress
It could be worse. Imagine a two-factor authentication system built on JavaCard.
Status: Da fuq is this episode of Forensic Files that doesn't have the regular VO guy?
Those are pretty awesome chairs. I've used one in person. I even made vroom-vroom sounds while sitting in it.
Anybody got good QA/BA interview questions? The only really non-crap questions I know of are "Describe in detail how to make a PB&J (spared no expense!)" and my Darwinian-version of "How do you make toast with a toaster while standing in a bathtub full of water?".
Also any suggestions for automation testing frameworks? We mostly deal with thick-client apps in every language/framework imaginable but something that can do Java/.NET/Win32 would be great. Bulk of our clicky-stuff for test is Win32/.NET so not having Java/Others-who-won't-be-named isn't that big a deal.
Relevant when I first posted it and still relevant now:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b2F-DItXtZs
Anyway, theproofapproximation consistent with the logical but non-intuitive conclusion is in the simulation.
FTFY.
Would you believe me if I told you the kind of Mathematicians most likely to have gambling problems are Statisticians?
Oh look a thread about Math...
My quick google-foo says you have to use a trademark within a 5-year period for it to not die out. Vaulting of works is probably 99% about driving up demand for a re-release. Disney seems pretty good at reusing core but non-prominent characters: Max Goof and P.J. Pete.
I can't recall seeing anyone from Rescuers or Rescuers Down Under in recent years but I don't take yearly trips to Disney Land/World so they may still get used. Β―_(γ)_/Β―
And fuck you for ruining my shrug meme in preview.
Edit: I bet The Black Cauldron is one of the few Disney will let lapse and pretend nothing ever happened.
I think you hit an interesting point; how many individual characters can a company trademark apply to and can you continuously expand a trademark with characters. Furthermore the need to continuously use the trademark would make some characters potentially ineligible at some point.