and there's one major one that sends and wants EBCDIC (BASE II, )
EBCDIC actually comes from IBM Mainframes
and there's one major one that sends and wants EBCDIC (BASE II, )
Microsoft is still supporting stuff from 30 years ago.
Oddly enough, I found out just the other day that on Android cellphones they actually do. All it takes is a USB OTG cable.
It's like selling you milk, but banning you from putting it in your coffee.
Turns out Lumia 9xx and 10xx phones don't support Internet sharing over Bluetooth, so. Suck.
Am I crazy, or is Microsoft?
Also, maybe they plan on giving the buyers a WinPhone to act as an access point, since nobody is buying them anyway ;)
I once read these stories about idiot Linux users and their shitty OS and then pointed and laughed at them!
Those same programmers NEVER wanted to talk about the fact that their beloved .NET was open sourced by MS, since it clashed with their belief.
But, I never pointed them laughing
But it's not. There's no movement of data. The symbols don't "go" anywhere.
There is more than one definition of that word : http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/import
I like how Linux has a key combination dedicated to making it crash
That's as close as you can get to the Windows experience !
:wat.sql:that does not compute.... unless it's like car models? and even then that's the wrong way around. the 2016 model year starts like septembre of 2015... somewhere around there anyway.
Ha ha ha, you know what's a hilariously funny joke of laughs and whimsy? Make fun of a Microsoft product that hasn't existed for a decade!
Hey tell us one about Microsoft Bob next, those are a cascade of chuckles!
I should be more of a pathetic weenie
keep a mental database of every stupid, buggy, failed open source project in the last 30 years
That's only because our industry took a dive directly into the moronic Git instead of choosing something better.
It's really hard to even have a discussion with someone THIS ignorant about a product.
I challenge you to make a full-length porn movie in which nobody repeats a single move. With humans, not transformers.
a crazy guy ranting on the side of the road
Everything we're using today is worse than shit that existed 20 years ago. Every goddamned thing.
So Windows 95 was better than Windows 8 ?
.NET is worst than VB 5 ?
PowerShell is worst than the DOS prompt ?
For example, on this install I unchecked the "Desktop environment" package during install, rebooted to shell, and installed what is considered a non-standard Desktop environment for Debian.
Did you try just starting another GUI instance ?
CTRL-ALT-F1 -> login -> startx
On my desktop I now have 2 GUI, one on ALT-F7 and the other on ALT-F8
Worst case, create another user if your program still refuse to run under the same user.
Another solution would be to install a VNC server and create multiple VNC sessions under different users
There is more than one way to achieve your goal
And if you install that broken one from Visual Studio 2008 that shits files all over the root level of the HD, we're all allowed to punch you in the face.
Oh look, Blakeyrat's right.
By that same logic, you must assume that every .NET application is built-in .NET since you need .NET to compile them
Windows has had that since 1991. Get the hell off my lawn.
Get a new virus scanner, printer driver, or BonziBuddy; yours is obviously broken.
Right, those things that almost never work, unlike Windows' driver loading and unloading, which almost always works. Because Microsoft made it a WHQL signing requirement.
Something tells me you only looked at the title.
I got busy at work. Then you guys swarmed here and eh whatever.
Nonsense. For a while I used a ton of them with the hope of provoking a blakeyrant...and it never happened.
They won't because it can't be done without a radical redesign of the OS kernel. (For example, to a BeOS-style microkernel where everything in the OS including stuff like networking, storage, etc is a rebootable "service". But even then, updating a service was functionally identical to a reboot in many, many cases.)The only difference between Windows and Linux in this area is Windows is honest about the need to reboot, and Linux fans dangerously lie to their users that you don't need to.
You can't be that fuckin stupid.
Or maybe you can.
So restarting a single service is equivalent to rebooting the whole machine. At least now I know why every new version of windows is innovative because it can boot faster !
I know drivers are built-in to the kernal.hint : rmmod and modprobe.hint: dsajdgg and weuyuytqetw
Your ignorance would not be so bad if you didn't use it to trash everything not MS
Nope. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ksplice
That also kills his comment that "I highly doubt it will work.". Even if it's been possible since 2008.
Of course, if MS ever manage to fix the "reboot every time we patch something", he will call it Innovation !
It's copypasta. Google the phrase "MariaDB also provides user statistics and better instrumentation"
What, was I supposed to write a novel here ? blakeyrat can't even be bothered to do some research before he spit on anything open source.
@TimeBandit said:On your oh-so-loved windows, every fu***n insignificant piece that gets updated forces you to reboot.Until you update drivers, Windows can do a shitload more with drivers than Linux can.
What "innovation" has MariaDB introduced? I mean, maybe there is something-- I honestly don't know. (But I doubt it.)
Community improvements from Facebook, Twitter, Google, and Percona all roll into MariaDB sooner than they appear in MySQL.
MariaDB also provides user statistics and better instrumentation through the data dictionary information schema, including microsecond support. If you're using TIME or DATETIME data types, you can specify precision, such as TIME(4), where the number represents the number of digits after the decimal place. MariaDB supports up to six digits -- for example, 0.000001 second or one microsecond. No more wondering how fast is fast. For those cases where precision is not specified, MariaDB defaults to 0 for easy backward compatibility.
The query optimizer in MariaDB offers serious improvements, including better subquery optimization, as well as faster, more efficient, and more consistent joins, derived tables, and views. In addition, MariaDB gives you additional control over how the optimizer makes decisions, exposing more internal instrumentation and configuration as server variables you can set.
MariaDB gives you two new high-performance storage engines to choose from: Aria and XtraDB.
You also get access to a whole new clustering technology called Galera. It allows active-active multimaster updating. Here you can really start to scale writes on cloud servers. You also get access to parallel and synchronous replication features.
Want to get NoSQL speed? Consider the HandlerSocket plug-in, which enables direct access to storage engines without going through the optimizer, boosting velocity by 10 times or more. You can also now get a row of data returned in JSON format using dynamic columns in MariaDB -- not so in MySQL.
MariaDB includes yet another new storage engine, Cassandra SE, that allows you to read or write data into a Cassandra data store. Finally, integration between SQL and NoSQL made easy!
Want to consolidate data from multiple master databases? Multisource replication is exactly what you're looking for. Assuming your source data is stored in multiple schemas, they can all be brought together on one instance downstream -- again, not possible in MySQL.
That is just some examples of the improvements MariaDB brings over MySQL.
But hey, of course it's shit, since it is open source
So do you have an example of something open source has done recently that I might consider innovative? I mean you can at least try here.
Also illustrated with a woman in a dress for some reason.
The two's complement thing only works if you have an infinite string of 1's, and if you have that, you don't have a number.
Only because the time and frustration from your awful ISP outweighs the amount possible from any OS.
I was just offering a counter to Blakey's assertion that he knows shit nobody else knows and that any other way of thinking is wrong, and that whatever Linux or any CLI does is wrong.
Also, the funny thing is that Linux went from 2.x to 3.0 for this exact same reason: Linus liked big numbers. And now he does it again because he hasn't had enough.
Now, if he keep going at it, at some point the major version number will be too big
Because they're capable of making stuff that's actually worth a damn?
Probably a multi-terabyteext3
disk... Whenfsck
is run at boot because of a scheduled disk check (β/dev/somedisk has gone 42 days without being checked, check forcedβ), it ignores the journal and checks everything.
I was shocked that a Symantec product didn't suck.
We have an EMC SAN and own a NetApp - alike NAS. Security just hasn't blessed it for anything sensitive. And I need board level approval to move to one of those once I convince them.
But any server, whether it's Linux or Windows, is another moving part that just isn't necessary.
There are a ton of other choices out there in the market, I'm sure there are some that won't send you into BlakeyRage.
Sorry for mentioning NetApp - BTW, did they kick your dog or something?
As it is, we use Windows because I can't convince idiot managers that Linux can do CIFS reliably enough to work.
When they see that it takes a lot less time to push it to the Linux server, maybe they will see the light (tm)
Get storage hardware that presents the storage to the LAN directly, like one of the many NetApp products.
But my comment was more about the actual filesystem. Your NAS should use a journaled filesystem like EXT4, etc.
At least it won't take hours to scan the filesystem when you bring it back to life
4 hours to do a chkdsk !
That's why you should never run your fileserver on a shitty, oups sorry, Windows OS.
Get a real fileserver : http://www.freenas.org/
Well, even if it still works, it's probably pulse dialling. Do modern phone interchanges still support that?