@savar said:
http://idlogger.wordpress.com/2008/03/22/which-is-better-phillips-or-flat-head/
Did you even read that article?
@savar said:
http://idlogger.wordpress.com/2008/03/22/which-is-better-phillips-or-flat-head/
@tfa said:
Rob is currently employed as a Software Engineer at Symantec.
I am not even sure how someone fails this much at a site layout, especially someone advertising their CSS work, but enjoy: http://www.freundlichs.com/
@bstorer said:
And C# is just Java!
@bstorer said:
I don't think that's a valid line of reasoning. By that logic, every programming language has been in development since Fortran came out in the 1950's, because they're all based on the ones that came before.
@amischiefr said:
or the complexities of C
@amischiefr said:
Americans are lazy and stupid
@Spectre said:
Hey, don't get too carried away with this "community moderation" thingy! "A week" means merely comatose, not dead.
@belgariontheking said:
Sweet fucking Christ will you people stop responding to the troll?
@campkev said:
Because I'm new to the internets, so I don't realize that occasionally, while viewing a link from a thread or typing a reply, some one else also posts a similary reply making for duplicate posts.
Wed, Dec 10 2008 10:29 AM
Wed, Dec 10 2008 10:42 AM
@campkev said:
Look! I can be a jackass too.
@Ilya Ehrenburg said:
Me too! I need to post on a zombie thread too!Calm down, he registered in May already. He's just a slow poster.
@Ilya Ehrenburg said:
You don't say!
Looks like it has been fixed.
Look! I can be really stupid just like you guys!
@astonerbum said:
netflix.
new ThreadAbortException("Cigarette butt discarded on sidewalk.");
@bjolling said:
Indeed, f*ck smokers and non-smoker alike. I thought these forums where about code related WTF's.
Now, back on-topic to OOP and GC
@bjolling said:
<mumbles>In my days I had to delete [] m_arrSmokers; myself. Damn kids with their silly high-level languages and garbage collectors and stuff...</mumbles>
@bjolling said:
@Farmer Brown said:
If any quantity of a class of people litter, getting rid of them can only be a good thing.Finally somebody started talking about OOP principles instead of this nonsensical flamewar between smokers and non-smokers. Always mind however that calling the destructor of the CSmoker class will also call the destructor of CPerson and therefore cleans up all garbage that CSmokers inherit from CPersons
@morbiuswilters said:
If a smoker litters that does not mean all smokers litter. Please learn to be rational.
@bjolling said:
I'm already imagining this guy shooting himself in the foot with his long range missile.
@too_many_usernames said:
I suppose I could say I was being generous, or maybe I could say I was being evil in that in giving code that someone doesn't understand they'll just shoot themselves in the foot later. The scary part is, even I don't know which one of those is more accurate...
@Welbog said:
Why are we having this discussion again? We've had it a brazillion times before. The conclusion is always the same: in a high-level language you should be using enumeration and iteration abstractions instead of arrays for collections of objects, so you never have need of numeric indexes in the first place. If you're not using these abstractions in a language that has them, then you are the real WTF. In a low-level language that doesn't have such fancy abstractions, you can have this argument, but the fact is if the language is low-level, then it sometimes makes more sense for arrays to be closer to the low-level offset structures in memory that they represent, and it sometimes doesn't. It depends on the language and application. Notwithstanding in the majority of modern languages with zero-based indexing, you can make abstractions yourself to have libraries with structures with 1-based indexing.
@Zemm said:
How about, "I am standing at the first item and I wish to move down the list, how many times do I have to move from the beginning to get to each item?"
So the first item is 0 "moves" and the 20th item is 19 "moves". Makes perfect sense to me.
@Rhamphoryncus said:
The real WTF is you were signing up for the IEEE?
@Soviut said:
Money talks. The thought of possibly losing your life to lung cancer, or giving someone else lung cancer, in the future is easily dismissed. The thought of losing your job right now isn't.
@morbiuswilters said:
Seriously, when are people going to quit with this "new century" junk? It's been a new century for damn near a decade now.
Point.
Morbiuswilter's head.
@DOA said:
@Farmer Brown said:
@DOA said:Last time my jackass alarm had gone off like this, it was MPS.@dtech said:I smell excelMe too. It smells just like noob.
Just because you are both too dumb to use Excel properly, and would apparently use Excel for a system like this does not mean everyone would.Now taking bets on how long before Farmer Brown gets the boot.
@DOA said:
@dtech said:
I smell excelMe too. It smells just like noob.
@Welbog said:
@mcgp said:ok So let me be the Frist to saw TRWTF would be that u didnt take the dog out for a walk yet ........... Behind the shed.......... with a shotgun...............Epic troll or 8-year-old boy in dire need of an education?
@morbiuswilters said:
he's trying to bait people into arguments and he persists in verbally attacking forum members, including several completely off-topic and random bits of flamebait targeted at me. He's just trying to derail the threads with flaming and the best thing you can do is look the other way.
@Flatline said:
And you have the guts to accuse other people of trolling? The only reason I can see for you posting this is just to have a bash at Java. It's been done (and is currently being done) far better and with actual evidence to back them up by other people.
@DOA said:
So is there a decent CMS out there or are we doomed to code everything ourselves?
@Weng said:
If you mean something else entirely, please elaborate.
To add a foo to the DB, it should be as simple as something like: FooDBObject.Add(param1,param2,param3);
Your problem isn't parameterized queries, but rather high school grade code.
@tgape said:
Oddly enough, at work, they always schedule an 'outage window' whenever they do their periodic UPS testing - despite the fact that all of our gear is supposed to be dual powered.
@bstorer said:
What say we table this and get to work on some new material?
@DaveK said:
Jeez how many of these are there on this forum??We've done this one(*) before, when .NET 3.5 first came out:
... so I guess this is SP1 to that post?
(*) - More than once, actually:
and there have been many others that I can't dig up owing to the way the search function on the site doesn't search the text of dialog box captions in pictures in the Error'd series...
@fyjham said:
@morbiuswilters said:
That said, maybe the lack of documentation is a feature. After all, if the bad guys take over your firewall you don't want it to be easy for them to figure out how it works.Hey, let's do this with our database designs. If we design a weird enough database then we don't have to worry about SQL injection cause they won't know what to do if they get access! :)
It is obvious the OP has no idea what MS ISA server is or how it works. I think we can all just move on...
@roy said:
circumvent generics
Are you really writing that for every single call???
@raziel said:
and by the way not one of you has been able to dispute my origional point
thats the killer to your eletist arguments
ROFLMAO this guy is great!
@DaveK said:
So you didn't get that "It could tell you but then ..." was a subtle way of saying - by allusion - "It doesn't want to send security-sensitive information over an insecure channel"?
@durendal.mk3 said:
I'm currently shoving a pot, a kettle, and a raging hot iron up your stupid, useless ass.
@bstorer said:
Hey, the JVM's not bad.
@HypocriteWorld said:
Java is a stupid language. It has a disgustingly stupid type system, a half-assed approach to everything, and has insufficient tools for abstraction. It is a lame thing, and even though it tries to claim that it is a "new" language (when it came out), nothing is actually new, as everything Java provides has already been around in 1980. Java must die!!!!
There, now do you feel validated?
Also, the implementation of generics is a joke.
@PJH said:
@Farmer Brown said:
But you are an expert in it. Surely that means you are responsible for at least part of it right?What was that someone said earlier about derailing threads?
@Weng said:
It's not hard. It's just fucking tedious.
And frankly, in I'm-not-pissed-because-I-just-burned-a-ton-of-time-doing-fuckall retrospect, the majority of this code needed to be written anyway because '' != null and full on half of the code in there was fixing that.
TRWTF is the machinations that I'm going to have to deal with to pry data out of the database and shove it into asp.net form elements.
@Zecc said:
I'm guessing it's a case of lazy copy-pasting. Nothing wrong with that.