@orange_robot said:I had the throw-your-computer-out-the-window-rage-inducing moment of Googling "strrchr". It "corrects" my search to strchr, then asks if I actually meant to search for what I typed in. Yes, Google, thanks ever so much. It condescends to search for my search term as I entered if and the first handful of results had no instances of "strrchr" on the entire page.
Are you absolutely, positively certain that you didn't put in an extra r and accidentally search for strrrchr instead? Because "strrchr" works for me, but "strrrchr" auto-corrects to strchr. So does "strrchrr". Though with any variant I've tried, if you click the "yes, search for what I typed link" the top results all demonstrate strrchr.
And I'm not a drooling moron either, and generally know what I'm doing, yet I still make the occasional typo which I don't always catch immediately. If Google corrects it for me, that's a good thing. And that happens much more frequently than the "no, I really did mean what I typed and not some other much more popular term" issue.
For the OP:
@BaRRaKID said:If i remove the minus "-" from the search term it works as expected, so maybe the engine is smart and its subtraction 100 from NB500, and the result is obviously C660-1GD
Much more likely it's interpreting the request as "find pages with 'NB500', excluding pages with '100'". Then it can't find any because all the NB500 pages have NB500-100 in them, so it returns the closest thing it can find.