People who are not Mike Patton
-
@DogsB said in People who are not Mike Patton:
@loopback0 said in People who are not Mike Patton:
@Gribnit said in People who are not Mike Patton:
I continue to note with increasing alarm that this group continues not to exist
But as an alternative there's @by-joining-this-group-you-agree-to-be-mentioned-randomly-for-no-reason-is-that-okay-yes-no which exclusively contains people who do not claim to be Mike Patton
I would like to confirm that I am not Mike Patton.
Good luck with that.
-
I confirm that I have never claimed to be Mike Patton.
-
I don't know who Mike Patton is, so I'm pretty sure I'm not Mike Patton, but I suppose there's a theoretical possibility that I could be Mike Patton without knowing it.
-
This'll probably help with the widespread rumors. But if only there were some more efficient, perhaps declarative, way to gather this information. Some sort of a "tag" or "badge" or something.
-
@Gribnit if mostly everybody had such a tag or badge, it’d make it awful hard to find the few, perhaps only the one, that didn’t.
Suggest instead the default assumption that majority of people are not Mike Patton and that the real Mike Patton should be identified and appropriately tagged and badged.
-
@Arantor All the same greats, all the same mistakes. It doesn't have to be like this.
-
@Applied-Mediocrity Gribnit begs to differ.
-
@boomzilla Should we perhaps create a group that only Mike Patton can join?
Alternatively:
I know my preference, and I suspect I know yours too.
-
@Zecc it's funnier to not have the group and have
complain every so often after being reminded.
-
@Arantor said in People who are not Mike Patton:
the real Mike Patton should be identified and appropriately tagged
-
@HardwareGeek I was open to graffiti style tagging too as a more humane option, but essentially yes.
-
@boomzilla I thought @Gribnit was asking for the creation of the group of people who are not Mike Patton? I was proposing the complementary group.
-
@Zecc I was mostly replying to your "Alternatively:
"
-
@boomzilla Well, like I said: I know my preference, and I suspect I know yours. And I'll add: they are the same.
-
@Zecc said in People who are not Mike Patton:
they are the same
Of course they are. Because they are the same
-
@Applied-Mediocrity correct, we are all boomzilla, and we are all on the
page.
-
@Arantor said in People who are not Mike Patton:
@Applied-Mediocrity correct, we are all boomzilla, and we are all on the
page.
Boomzilla wouldn't need to affirm his part of the collective nor would his allow him to. You are Mike Patton! 
-
I will neither confirm nor deny that I am Mike Patton, but will note that Mike Patton and I have never been observed at the same time.
-
Hypothesis: @error is not Mike Patton, but they are quantum entangled.
-
@Zecc said in People who are not Mike Patton:
Hypothesis: @error is not Mike Patton, but they are quantum entangled.
And so say we all: I am also not Mike Patton but am similarly quantum entangled.
