A question for the ages (featuring @Luhmann)
-
-
@DoctorJones
It's hardly any clearer ...
-
@Luhmann For every country A not equal to B*****m there is a country C not equal to B*****m such that C prefers an independent B*****m over B*****m being part of A.
-
@PleegWat
It even works with our federal parts as opposed to countries ...For every federal part A of B there is a federal part C such that C prefers to remain in B over A being independent
-
@PleegWat "country C not equal to B*****m" implies that B*****m would rather be part of some country A than be independent
-
@Gąska Rather, for most values of A, the opinion of B is pretty much irrelevant.
-
@PleegWat said in A question for the ages (featuring @Luhmann):
@Gąska Rather, for most values of A,
the opinion ofB is pretty much irrelevant.