New Obligatory XKCD Reference
-
For your viewing pleasure:[http://xkcd.com/1597/]
-
http://xkcd.com/1597
I like the start of the last paragraph: "No idea." From what I've heard, that sums up GIT very well.
-
Can we get a fourth thread with that particular comic?
Also, @coynethedup's FTFY didn't, because it made a link that works with middle-click but not left-click. Nice job, Discurse.
-
@slavdude said:
http://xkcd.com/1597
Impressive. A plain URL renders such that a plain click on it opens a tab with a broken URL.Let's see if rendering it with BBCode works any better: [URL]http://xkcd.com/1597[/URL]
...
Yeah, that works
...
And now, inexplicably, the link provided by ConyeTheDup, which didn't work when I first wrote this reply, now works just fine. How weird.
-
And now, inexplicably, the link provided by ConyeTheDup, which didn't work when I first wrote this reply, now works just fine. How weird.
It's not inexplicable. The explanation is Discourse.
-
-
The Schrödinger software ?
No, Schrödinger software would be simultaneously shitty and non-shitty until it's observed, and have 50% probability of resolving to either state. When observed, Discourse is shitty with a probability of 1 (or at least close enough to 1 to be functionally indistinguishable from it), and Occam would suggest that it is also shitty even when it's not being observed.
-
No, Schrödinger software would be simultaneously shitty and non-shitty until it's observed, and have 50% probability of resolving to either state. When observed, Discourse is shitty with a probability of 1 (or at least close enough to 1 to be functionally indistinguishable from it), and Occam would suggest that it is also shitty even when it's not being observed.
I think it's Heisensoftware. Great...until you try to use it.