Google's latest Unitard - Arsenic Manipulation Pathologically
-
-
lso amp-img screws up the browser's preloader (but maybe that was CLOSED BYDESIGN?)
It was. amp-img (and audio, and video, and anything else loading secondary resources) is explicitly set up in such a way that it takes full (or atleast as much as possible) control of the loading process, in an effort to 'make things more optimized'.
That's the nice story for content publishers. In reality, all the manhandling the AMP project is doing to the browser requires a metric fuckton of polyfilled cutting edge, non-settled APIs that are only really 100% available in Chrome.
It's a nice little way of making Chrome even faster while making the competition bleed.
If you ask me, this whole thing is not aimed at making browsing better for users at all. It seems to be aimed squarely at content publishers and advertisers, baitng them into being consolidated onto Google's platform, both in ad platforms and in client browser ecosphere and creating a system of vendor lock-in.
-
@blakeyrat said:
Saved you a Google.
It's right in the thread title dude...
Who changed the title of my thread?
http://i.imgur.com/qB2tIbj.gif
-
Did anyone else recognize this as valid Haskell code, specifically the [spoiler]
map
[/spoiler] function?
-
-
I may have posted this before (from my quotes file):
Ferdirand: I was TA for a C++ programming course aimed at 1st year physics once. Some girl asked for help "i wrote pseudo-code but I cannot translate it to C++". Her pseudo-code was valid haskell. I cried.
-
Did anyone else recognize this as valid Haskell code, specifically the [spoiler]
map
[/spoiler] function?I didn't recognize it as valid per se, but it did read about like all the other Haskell code I read around here.
-
I didn't recognize it as valid per se, but it did read about like all the other Haskell code I read around here.
Which is why you didn't recognize it.
-
JSONP
Is
document.write("some json-encoded string");
not JSONP? The callback is document.write in this case.
-
I would argue not, since it can only happen at page load and no other point during the page's lifestyle.
But I don't think these things have hard-and-fast definitions.
-
It's all Haskell to me.
-
map
!
-
Yes. Goes to show how easy Haskell is to read.
@HardwareGeek said:
DO NOT WANTIt's using a Unicode text extension to make heiroglyphs as names. The official implementation looks like
map :: (a -> b) -> [a] -> [b] map f [] = [] map f (x:xs) = f x : (map f xs)
Abusing the extension like that for production code really would be a huge wtf, though. It's really meant to let you use the unicode arrows like
ā
instead of=>
.
-
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CAkqCsNVEAI5Hbg.png
Now there's the language for me! My actual keyboard for reals:
-
Now that would be great fun giving technical support for over the phone!
Ok, I need you to open the
Run
dialog, so hit scarab-bowl...
-
Really?
Because I've got a friend who's currently working on his doctorate in Egyptology. He'd be in my debt forever if I could get this keyboard for his next birthday :)
-
YARLY.
I got the keycaps custom printed from WASDKeyboards.com and popped them onto a Filco Tenkeyless. WASD can also make you the whole board but I like my Filcos.
You can reuse my SVG if you want. It's over here: http://superjer.com/lies/wasd-hieroglyphs-104-v2.svg
I tried to match up the glyphs to the equivalent English letters. For the numbers I put the glyphs for the powers of ten. I'm not an Egyptologist though. For modifier keys and etc I just picked whatever looked good.
-
-
Mine's not for sale! It's MINE!
It's too good a deterrent for people at the office wanting to use my computer.
"Let me do this thing on your computer real quick!" looks at keyboard "Never mind, I'll use my own computer."
-
-
I didn't go to such extremes as you, but I rearranged a bunch of the keycaps so it said NAMEROCKS instead of QWERTYUI at work many years ago. Same effect.
-
NAMEROCKS
ALEXROCKS
? Where? I don't see themEdit: Wait, how did the text change under---
You know what, nevermind.
Filed under: Ninja-Edited quote selection
-
I rearranged a bunch of the keycaps so it said NAMEROCKS
I think this is the first time I've ever been disappointed that my name has a repeated letter.
-
I didn't go to such extremes as you, but I rearranged a bunch of the keycaps so it said NAMEROCKS instead of QWERTYUI at work many years ago. Same effect.
I am SO going to do that. My keyboard layout is set to Dvorak, so the keycaps on my keyboard don't match the letters that appear on the screen anyway
-
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CAkqCsNVEAI5Hbg.png
To me they are not emoticons. They are operators. :)