Nobody shares knowledge better than this
-
SpectateSwamp's family tradition - confronting perps.
On going political knowledge shared. As not to bore you I'll be posting updates at my blog:
http://chamber-of-commerce-corrupts-politics.blogspot.com/
I will be updating this quit a bit in the next little while. Lots of things to get off my chest. Mother confronts molesting principal (1955). Turd tamper threatens to kill my sister and more.
I let the politicians know of this site. The 2000+ replys would have them worried. My other main thread had over 17,000 views. Scary for the no goods when they see those numbers.
I'll come back to answer questions re the "nobody shares knowledge better than this" Otherwise See ya later.
.
-
@SpectateSwamp said:
On going political knowledge shared. As not to bore you I'll be posting updates at my blog:
http://chamber-of-commerce-corrupts-politics.blogspot.com/
I will be updating this quit a bit in the next little while. Lots of things to get off my chest. Mother confronts molesting principal (1955). Turd tamper threatens to kill my sister and more.
I let the politicians know of this site. The 2000+ replys would have them worried. My other main thread had over 17,000 views. Scary for the no goods when they see those numbers.
I'll come back to answer questions re the "nobody shares knowledge better than this" Otherwise See ya later.
.
Are you planning to stand for election in US of A?
-
@Nagesh said:
Are you planning to stand for election in US of A?
He is canadian, so no, he won't, other than that, he would be a fine president
-
[b]Chamber of Commers is a community dis-service group[/b]
Who are all these commers?
-
-
@PJH said:
@Nagesh said:
Chamber of Commers
Chamber of CommerceNope, according to Mr Swamp's site, Commers are the problem. I'm not sure why he should object to a defunct vehicle manufacturer. but it's probably a Random Random thing.
-
@Tiggrrr42 said:
Nope, according to Mr Swamp's site, Commers are the problem.
Oh - right. I don't see his posts these days so haven't seen any links to his site.
-
Warren Buffett must die
If he lived to be 300 years old. He'd own everything on the planet. Same goes for corporations.
Corporations should have a life span of 50 years. With 1% per year accruing to the government. If the corporation is sold off earlier than that; say 25 years then 25% of the sale price should go to the govt. Otherwise we will forever be enslaved by the corps.
Monopoly games that never end, would be extremely unfair to the new players. Same with poker. Those with large stacks of chips are most likely to win out in the end.
The playing field isn't level when corporations live forever. Death to corporations after 50 years would solve that problem.
-
@SpectateSwamp said:
Otherwise we will forever be enslaved by the corps.
...and by doing what you suggest we'll be enslaved by the government. Same thing, but with nukes. Monopolies controlled by government are just as dangerous as monopolies controlled by corporations.
-
@SpectateSwamp said:
If he lived to be 300 years old. He'd own everything on the planet. Same goes for corporations.
Corporations should have a life span of 50 years. With 1% per year accruing to the government. If the corporation is sold off earlier than that; say 25 years then 25% of the sale price should go to the govt. Otherwise we will forever be enslaved by the corps.
Monopoly games that never end, would be extremely unfair to the new players. Same with poker. Those with large stacks of chips are most likely to win out in the end.
The playing field isn't level when corporations live forever. Death to corporations after 50 years would solve that problem.
The far better solution is to require that a corporation can only be owned by its current employees*. This would eliminate a whole pile of corporate abuses and things done in the interest of the owners rather than the interest of the employees. It also solves most of the "employers versus employees" debates, because this arrangement would make them the same group of people.
*Yes, you'd have to be careful about how you define "employee" so this doesn't get abused, but hopefully** the general concept is understood.**I can hope, can't I?
-
Crooked towns shouldn't count the votes unsupervised
@too_many_usernames said:
I like your idea, a lot. We have been screwed over for too long.The far better solution is to require that a corporation can only be owned by its current employees*. This would eliminate a whole pile of corporate abuses and things done in the interest of the owners rather than the interest of the employees. It also solves most of the "employers versus employees" debates, because this arrangement would make them the same group of people.
*Yes, you'd have to be careful about how you define "employee" so this doesn't get abused, but hopefully** the general concept is understood.**I can hope, can't I?
In a Whitecourt civic election the town staff tried to prevent a father / agent for a candidate from viewing the counting process. When it was about to come to blows the staff relented. We are not well served with this legislation. In a previous election a friend lost by ONE vote there was no automatic recount. Dirty town that Whitecourt.
Following is an email from the govt on this issue. With a warning about forwarding or printing etc. OOOh I'm scared.
Who was involved in crafting this piece of (*% legislation. I'll bring the feathers. Who's got the tar?
We need citizen videographers in all town offices. Otherwise every town will be like Bell City California.
Boo Govt legislators.
Cheers
Doug Pederson----- Original Message -----
From: "LGS Mail" lgsmail@gov.ab.ca
To: "Doug Pederson" stonedan@telusplanet.net
Cc: "Christine Skjerven" christine.skjerven@gov.ab.ca
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 1:52 PM
Subject: RE: Can they prevent them from viewing the ballot
Hi Doug,
An agent or candidate that is present in the polling station when ballots are being counted are in attendance to observe the process not the individual ballots. However, if a ballot is deemed void, section 86 of the Local Authorities Election Act (LAEA), provides that a candidate or agent can ask for the reason the ballot is void.
Any elector may apply to the Court by notice of motion for a recount within 19 days of the close of the voting stations on election day. The elector shall file an affidavit with the Clerk of the Court alleging reasonable grounds for believing that the presiding officer at the voting station did improperly count or reject ballots. A deposit of $300 is required.
If you have specific concerns about irregularities you may wish to seek legal counsel.
Judy Meredith
Municipal Advisor
(780) 422-8061
akamminga@gordongroup.com,trevorthain@whitecourt.ca,darlenechartrand@whitecourt.ca,maryannchichak@whitecourt.ca,normhodgson@whitecourt.ca,billmcaree@whitecourt.ca,derekschlosser@whitecourt.ca,williardstrebchuk@whitecourt.ca,swells@osoyoos.ca,mchadsey@osoyoos.ca,tcronmill@osoyoos.ca,cjrhodes@osoyoos.ca,mryan@osoyoos.ca,phampson@oliver.ca,mbasso@oliver.ca,jbennest@oliver.ca,mnewman@oliver.ca,tschafer@oliver.ca,editorial@whitecourtstar.com,editor@oliverchronicle.com,news@osoyoostimes.com,city@thejournal.canwest.com,submit@theherald.canwest.com,tabtips@theprovince.com,editor@pentictonherald.ca,stonedan@telusplanet.net,oliverosoyoos18@hotmail.com
-
Hey, look what I've found!
The people who are the worst at programming are the people who refuse to accept the fact that their brains aren't equal to the task. Their egos keep them from being great programmers. The more you learn to compensate for your small brain, the better a programmer you'll be. The more humble you are, the faster you'll improve.
Edsger W. Dijkstra, The Humble Programmer.
-
@flop said:
Edsger W. Dijkstra
I know that guy! It's the one who searched through graphs without using heuristics!
-
Corps must die - 50 year life span is enough
@RHuckster said:
...and by doing what you suggest we'll be enslaved by the government. Same thing, but with nukes. Monopolies controlled by government are just as dangerous as monopolies controlled by corporations.
I must have not explained it properly.
The corporation will be sold off. Dissolved. Caput. The govt funds would go into general revenue.
Otherwise we will have to wait for a complete collapse to rid ourselves of the Over Lords.
-
@SpectateSwamp said:
If he lived to be 300 years old. He'd own everything on the planet. Same goes for corporations.
Corporations should have a life span of 50 years. With 1% per year accruing to the government. If the corporation is sold off earlier than that; say 25 years then 25% of the sale price should go to the govt. Otherwise we will forever be enslaved by the corps.
Monopoly games that never end, would be extremely unfair to the new players. Same with poker. Those with large stacks of chips are most likely to win out in the end.
The playing field isn't level when corporations live forever. Death to corporations after 50 years would solve that problem.
famous saying
One who digs hole for others falls into that hole...
-
@SpectateSwamp said:
@RHuckster said:
...and by doing what you suggest we'll be enslaved by the government. Same thing, but with nukes. Monopolies controlled by government are just as dangerous as monopolies controlled by corporations.
I must have not explained it properly.
The corporation will be sold off. Dissolved. Caput. The govt funds would go into general revenue.
Otherwise we will have to wait for a complete collapse to rid ourselves of the Over Lords.
in my country corporation are two types: Municipal Corporations and Companies.
-
@SpectateSwamp said:
I must have not explained it properly.
The corporation will be sold off. Dissolved. Caput. The govt funds would go into general revenue.
Otherwise we will have to wait for a complete collapse to rid ourselves of the Over Lords.
As insane your idea is, yours is the best idea I've heard so far among the 2012 hopefuls. Wow, that makes me sad. So sad.
Decision 2012: WTF if Spectate wins?!
So, when are you going to update your blog? Oh, that's right, I forgot, you treat each individual blog as a single post. When you want to write something new, you'll just open another blogger account and write a new single article there. God, you're an idiot.
-
-
WANTED!! 1 Honest Chamber of Commerce Member
@derula said:
@SpectateSwamp said:
Maybe to start this corp killings. We'd assign the old nasties to a random number between 30 and 50 years of LIFE. Then termination. Too many patents hidden and destroyed. Die Corps Die.Corps must die
Checked vital signs of corps.
Corps already dead.Another Political blurb. I'm sorry.
How long must we wait, for an honest Chamber of Commerce member to come forward? To explain the forum fixing methods. Are most of the members aware of this trickery? Should we try to stop it or just continue videoing them and their cheating ways?
Come on CC members, this is a thread about sharing knowledge; so share up.
I've been uploading lots of Whitecourt European Hooded Crow video. The many followers quickly tire of the political rubbish.
-
Nagesh, while I respect your undoubted expertise, I have one piece of advice for you.
You can't out-troll SpectateSwamp. Don't even try.
Spectate... why do you think there are any Chamber of Commerce members reading this thread? Or this entire site, for that matter?
-
@Scarlet Manuka said:
Nagesh, while I respect your undoubted expertise, I have one piece of advice for you.
You can't out-troll SpectateSwamp. Don't even try.
Spectate... why do you think there are any Chamber of Commerce members reading this thread? Or this entire site, for that matter?
he is obvius afraid of future mensa member so much that is afraid to engage in talk
-
yo dawg, I heard u like to troll so we put some trolls in your troll thread so you can troll while you troll
-
Nagesh, you're not random enough to compete in this forum. You need to project a much more crazed image. Your posts are still almost coherent, so you have a way to go yet.
-
Spectateswamp is no Troll
@CaptainCaveman said:
yo dawg, I heard u like to troll so we put some trolls in your troll thread so you can troll while you troll
A Troll I am not.
Nobody shares knowledge better than me. Because my program is the greatest on the planet. PERIOD. I have been turfed from multiple forums for discussion Desktop Search Engines. The techies come out of the woodwork to argue. Never having written anything of the like in their lives. It's like shooting fish in a barrel. Mind you in the discussions I do come up with a few good ideas.
As for the Digital Video Showdown. Nobody but nobody does it better than Ole Swampie. I don't just blab about things I have no idea about. Like other trolls.
-
@SpectateSwamp said:
Nobody shares knowledge better than me.
You self promote, you do not share knowledge.@SpectateSwamp said:
Because my program is the greatest on the planet.
It isn't, it really isn't.@SpectateSwamp said:
I have been turfed from multiple forums for discussion Desktop Search Engines.
Probably because you are ignorant, arrogant, hopelessly off topic and generally behave like a dick.@SpectateSwamp said:
Never having written anything of the like in their lives.
The video playback was a piece of piss to copy, the rest is utter shit nobody wants.@SpectateSwamp said:
As for the Digital Video Showdown.
Did this ever happen? Did this go exactly like the two desktop search challenges you tried (hint - you didn't take part).@SpectateSwamp said:
I don't just blab about things I have no idea about. Like other trolls.
Fair point - you don't justblab about things you have no idea about; you blab about stuff you know about, think you know about and have absolutely no idea at all about.
-
SpenkSwamp the Troll
Yup. SpenkSwamp exhibits all the tell tale signs of trolling. Mostly trying to bask in the glory of others. What have these Trolls EVER done in comparison?? At best; they are some guitar ditty VS the Swamp Video Mega Symphony.
Have any of the nay-sayers ever produced a program that would surpass 2ndbestest? Nope! and the only reason 2ndbestest isn't #1.... Cuz Swamp Video is going be #1 forever. Leave your fancy New OS for this SUPER app? You bet, anybody with a few smarts would..
http://www.telusplanet.net/public/stonedan/bestest2.txt
The above is a sample customer account dump for Telco & Cable systems ETL. How easy it would be to make this a simple account balance CHANGER?? Whatever. A great great program for any beginner and Pro. I've personally written this kind of a program 500 - 700 times...
Boo Trolls.. Yeah Swamp Video hurrah
-
@SpectateSwamp said:
Yup. SpenkSwamp exhibits all the tell tale signs of trolling. Mostly trying to bask in the glory of others. What have these Trolls EVER done in comparison?? At best; they are some guitar ditty VS the Swamp Video Mega Symphony.
No offence but I am hardly basking in anyone's glory - I think you will find I am taking the piss out of you if anything.You are a rambling idiot who can't understand why a search tool that can't search is a disaster, you claim to have the best video tool ever but it is shit and all of it's functionality is easily duplicated.
The second bestest program ever is admittedly not as good as SSRR, that just means it is even more shit, quite why a program so stunning and powerful needs to be rewritten 700 times however is a mystery.
-
@spenk said:
quite why a program so stunning and powerful needs to be rewritten 700 times however is a mystery.
If you have a look at it, I'm sure you'll agree that it needs to be rewritten at least once more.It's like a miniature version of SSDS, less insane only because it is far shorter. It still has all of SpectateSwamp's favourite misfeatures:
- Meaningless variable names (ddd, rrr, ppp, aaa; data fields are a1 through a30)
- rrr and ppp never get used
- One subroutine that does everything (henceforth the STDE)
- All program control done using goto (effectively; the initialisation subroutine issues a call to the STDE, as its last action - so having the STDE as a separate subroutine actually isn't useful; you might as well merge them, especially since there's initialisation code in the STDE as well. On the other hand things like the "display the current record" part that [b]should[/b] be separate subroutines are just labelled sections of code)
- No real error handling: an error handler exists, but all it does is display the error, put up an inputbox so you have to respond, and then quits (the result of the inputbox is ignored). Of course not having an error handler would accomplish the same thing
- Separate fields are not in separate controls; the display is controlled by lots of Print Tab(magic number) statements
- All the inputboxes have hardcoded (all different) positions specified, for no very clear reason
- Hardcoded complete file paths for every file used
- If the user clicks "Cancel" on the initial prompt, it doesn't quit, it just starts at the beginning of the file
- You can only search on one field, phone number
- If the user does enter a number in the initial prompt, it reads in one line at a time from the input file until it finds it; if it doesn't find it it will quit with an EOF error
- You only get one chance to enter a number. After that all you can do is go to the next record; no moving back and forth or jumping around
- I really mean that's all you can do; on the "enter to continue" prompt the response is ignored, cancel is ignored, you just get sent to the next record regardless
- If you enter a phone number without area code, it assumes area code 778; a comment explains that "the vast majority are 780"
- The only way to get it to quit without manually killing it is to read to the end of file and then let it die with an EOF error
- That's correct, the program has [b]no[/b] concept of normal termination
Shockingly, and in contrast to SSDS, the sections of the program are listed pretty much in the order that they are executed. I assume this is mainly because it is such a short program. Nevertheless, there is one thing about its structure that is good, and that's one more than SSDS had.
Actually there is another improvement over SSDS - it doesn't seem to reuse the main variables for a different purpose a bit later on without any explanation, which was such an endearing feature of SSDS. "aaa" does get reused, but only to throw away the results of various inputboxes, so that's consistent enough for me.
-
@SpectateSwamp said:
http://www.telusplanet.net/public/stonedan/bestest2.txt
Actually, it isn't a dump program, it's a dump viewer. The dump already has to exist in the file c:\search\bestest2input.txt for your program to work.The above is a sample customer account dump for Telco & Cable systems ETL. How easy it would be to make this a simple account balance CHANGER??
Therefore, it wouldn't be very easy to make this an account balance changer, because you have no integration to the account system at all. At best you might be able to modify the dump file (though you'd have to alter your program fairly radically even to do that).
Did you know that you can open up your dump file in Excel and view it with the Data Form button? If you have column headers then it will label each field for you. You can scroll backwards or forwards through the list - and not just one record at a time, there's a proper fully-functioning scrollbar; you can search for any criterion on any field, either forwards or backwards in the list; you can update values on the fly; you can delete records that you don't want; you can add and populate new records. It doesn't crash when you get to the end, either.
-
@Scarlet Manuka said:
Actually, it isn't a dump program
Right. It's a dumb program. He got that letter confused, really.
@Scarlet Manuka said:
Did you know that you can open up your dump file in Excel-
You missed his point. Not everyone has Excel. And who can keep track of the millions of programs you have to install for all the different purposes? Also, Excel only works on Windows. If you have SSRR (and, that second bestest program) you don't need anything else at all. No Windows or Excel needed. Way to go. Who can compete with that?
-
Oh goodie, we're back to making fun of his awful ProGrams. As I found it uncomfortable to half-agree with some of his political looniness, I am pleased that we have reverted back to this old enduring topic.
Spectate, what other programs have you written that you might share with us? Do you happen to have any that feature useful variable names? Why do you give them names such as "aaa", anyway?
-
@Xyro said:
Why do you give them names such as "aaa", anyway?
I am guessing for the same reason SSRR has commands like tt - it is quicker and easier to type 'aaa' rather thana more meaningful name like 'age'.
-
I've seen that stuff (and am probably guilty of it) from beginning programmers. I help tutor some first year college students with 'Programming 101' type stuff. They do this. They don't give variables or methods or classes good names because they usually don't understand what it is they are building, they don't 'see' or understand what a particular function or variable represents. So you get things like int a1 = 0 and function22() or programs written in an OO language where the entire program is implemented with a single method.... Swampy's SSRR and oddball file-parser-displayer-thingy are both excellent examples of how bad code and naming conventions can destroy the sustainability of a system, no matter what language.
-
@CaptainCaveman said:
Swampy's SSRR and oddball file-parser-displayer-thingy are both excellent examples of how bad code and naming conventions can destroy the sustainability of a system, no matter what language.
But [i]especially[/i] in VB6.
No, seriously. No language is immune to idiocy and horrible practices. You can write horrible code in Ruby on Rails as well as beautiful code in PHP. Just some languages make it easier to write horrible code while others make it easier to write good code.
Unfortunately, the ones that make it easier to write horrible code are also the ones most recommended to any used by beginners (or
stonersstone dancers), who somehow like to write horrible code.
-
-
@serguey123 said:
@derula said:
beautiful code in PHP. .
Proof is needed for this
I should add that I was talking modulo syntax. Because the beauty of syntax is largely based on opinion. I hate C/PHP/Java style syntax, but other than that, PHP (5, at least) has all the features to [i]make[/i] good code.
Sadly, I don't know of a proof. And I agree, I'd like to see some good PHP code too, for once. (edit: my own PHP code admittedly isn't really good xD)
-
@CaptainCaveman said:
I've seen that stuff (and am probably guilty of it) from beginning programmers. I help tutor some first year college students with 'Programming 101' type stuff. They do this. They don't give variables or methods or classes good names because they usually don't understand what it is they are building, they don't 'see' or understand what a particular function or variable represents. So you get things like int a1 = 0 and function22() or programs written in an OO language where the entire program is implemented with a single method.... Swampy's SSRR and oddball file-parser-displayer-thingy are both excellent examples of how bad code and naming conventions can destroy the sustainability of a system, no matter what language.
Swampy seems to write code like most beginners do - it is all about getting code written now because every single idea for a feature must be crammed in and written now, and obviously being a beginner you write code of such high quality it will never need to be bug fixed or maintained. This leads to variables and functions with no coherent naming scheme etc.
The comments alone show how Swampy approaches maintainability and documentation - most comments are things like
'24 March 2004
which presumably make sense to Swampy as that was the date he was sat outside a political meeting waiting to film a leaf and saw a bus drive past with an advert for something that caught his eye and while watching the bus go past he noticed a shop on the other side of the street with a colourful logo and this made him think of a new feature or a bug fix and to him this date has meaning. The rest of the world however have absolutely no frame of reference whatsoever for this comment and to them it is utterly useless.
-
@spenk said:
The comments alone show how Swampy approaches maintainability and documentation - most comments are things like
'24 March 2004
which presumably make sense to Swampy as that was the date he was sat outside a political meeting waiting to film a leaf and saw a bus drive past with an advert for something that caught his eye and while watching the bus go past he noticed a shop on the other side of the street with a colourful logo and this made him think of a new feature or a bug fix and to him this date has meaning.
QFLOLamros
-
Mensify yourself with Swamp video...
@Nagesh said:
he is obvius afraid of future mensa member so much that is afraid to engage in talk
You are in the right spot to mensify NageshSwamp. When everything you ever want video wise, audio, pics and text. is at your fingertips forever.
The mensas will live in fear of you OH great NageshSwamp. Just re-read the posts a few times, ignoring the Trolls of course.
-
@SpectateSwamp said:
The mensas will live in fear of you OH great NageshSwamp. Just re-read the posts a few times, ignoring the Trolls of course.
If all trolls were ignored in this thread, there wouldn't even be an OP.
-
@RHuckster said:
@SpectateSwamp said:
The mensas will live in fear of you OH great NageshSwamp. Just re-read the posts a few times, ignoring the Trolls of course.
If all trolls were ignored in this place, there wouldn't even be a website.
FTFY
-
Sharing Golf video like no other....
Check this playlist of 180 videos from the "Osoyoos Rotary Golf June 2010" series
<FONT color=#000000>http://www.youtube.c...3A340479871BAC3</FONT>
Some golfers we missed completely. But with the software changes we can start the recording earlier. Eliminating that problem.
This year we will have camcorders at 3 or more holes for even better coverage. Even the pros will be jealous.
-
@serguey123 said:
@RHuckster said:
@SpectateSwamp said:
The mensas will live in fear of you OH great NageshSwamp. Just re-read the posts a few times, ignoring the Trolls of course.
If all trolls were ignored in this place, there wouldn't even be a internet.
FTFY
FTFY again
-
@Nagesh said:
@serguey123 said:
aaand again@RHuckster said:
@SpectateSwamp said:
The mensas will live in fear of you OH great NageshSwamp. Just re-read the posts a few times, ignoring the Trolls of course.
If all trolls were ignored in this place, there wouldn't even be an internet.
FTFY
FTFY again
-
@derula said:
@Nagesh said:
@serguey123 said:
aaand again@RHuckster said:
@SpectateSwamp said:
The mensas will live in fear of you OH great NageshSwamp. Just re-read the posts a few times, ignoring the Trolls of course.
If all trolls were ignored, there wouldn't even be an universe.
FTFY
FTFY again
Infinite loop anyone?
-
@serguey123 said:
@derula said:
@Nagesh said:
@serguey123 said:
aaand again@RHuckster said:
@SpectateSwamp said:
The mensas will live in fear of you OH great NageshSwamp. Just re-read the posts a few times, ignoring the Trolls of course.
If all trolls were ignored, there wouldn't even be a universe.
FTFY
FTFY again
Infinite loop anyone?
The runtime analyzers are getting suspicious...
-
@Xyro said:
@serguey123 said:
THEY'RE COMING FOR US!!!@derula said:
@Nagesh said:
@serguey123 said:
aaand again@RHuckster said:
@SpectateSwamp said:
The mensas will live in fear of you OH great NageshSwamp. Just re-read the posts a few times, ignoring the Trolls of course.
If all trolls were ignored, there wouldn't even be a- HOLY SHIT WAS THAT A FUCKING TOBACCO LEAF FLIER???
FTFY
FTFY again
Infinite loop anyone?
The runtime analyzers are getting suspicious...
-
@derula said:
@Xyro said:
@serguey123 said:
THEY'RE COMING FOR US!!!@derula said:
@Nagesh said:
@serguey123 said:
aaand again@RHuckster said:
@SpectateSwamp said:
The mensas will live in fear of you OH great NageshSwamp. Just re-read the posts a few times, ignoring the Trolls of course.
If all trolls were ignored, there wouldn't even be a- HOLY SHIT WAS THAT A FUCKING TOBACCO LEAF FLIER???
FTFY
FTFY again
Infinite loop anyone?
The runtime analyzers are getting suspicious...
Apparently they got Swampy!, Nice going you guys! What I'm going to do now that Spectate ramblings have become a nice part of my day?
-
@serguey123 said:
@derula said:
@Xyro said:
@serguey123 said:
THEY'RE COMING FOR US!!!@derula said:
@Nagesh said:
@serguey123 said:
aaand again@RHuckster said:
@SpectateSwamp said:
The mensas will live in fear of you OH great NageshSwamp. Just re-read the posts a few times, ignoring the Trolls of course.
If all trolls were ignored, there wouldn't even be a- HOLY SHIT WAS THAT A FUCKING TOBACCO LEAF FLIER???
FTFY
FTFY again
Infinite loop anyone?
The runtime analyzers are getting suspicious...
Apparently they got Swampy!, Nice going you guys! What I'm going to do now that Spectate ramblings have become a nice part of my day?
Don't worry. He'll be back.
-
UNIX systems (such as Linux, FreeBSD, and even Mac OS X) do not need SSDS. You can do most of the same things using the commands that are already built-in to the system, including grep, awk, find, sed, cut, sort, and more. Adding only a few more small things would then have everything necessary to do these kind of things. And then you can even share things too, such as storing the files with public readable permissions, hosting a server for the files, copying them to disk, or whatever else. UNIX has been designed like this from the start.
