I nedd a help !!



  • Medezark,

    You're partially right. Vous would be better, however this rule tends to be less strict on the Internet where you can use "tu" without being rude. I did not mean here to be rude here, just nice actually.

     

     



  • @belgariontheking said:

    Dude, derula, you're scaring me.
     

    Someone understanding first-year highschool French is scary?



  • @FrogEater said:

    Medezark,

    You're partially right. Vous would be better, however this rule tends to be less strict on the Internet where you can use "tu" without being rude. I did not mean here to be rude here, just nice actually.

    I was just being a pain in the rear and trying to get my post count up.

    @Houda -- as far as problems with PetSmart -- Their method of determining the cost of grooming services relies upon the breed of dog, however if your dog is a mutt (mixed breed, sooner, Heinz 57) they have no clue how to price grooming services.  Perhaps a better method for them would be size and hair length.  But i don't know enough about dog grooming to make a valid judgement.

     



  • @Medezark said:

    i don't know enough about dog grooming to make a valid judgement.

    Wikipedia has a guide:

    @Wikipaedia said:

    Dog grooming refers to actions deliberately undertaken with the aim of befriending and establishing an emotional connection with a dog, in order to lower the dog's inhibitions in preparation for abuse (such as canine sexual abuse) or exploitation (such as canine labour - see trafficking of puppies).
    Dog grooming may be used to lure dogs into sexual exploitation such as dog prostitution or the production of doggie pornography. Although worldwide case law has an inherently heterogeneous history of offenders, generally canine sexual abuse occurs at the hands of someone personally close and well known to that dog. Thus, abuse is usually preceded by grooming.



  • I don't like the direction this thread has suddenly been shoved towards.



  • @davedavenotdavemaybedave said:

    Wikipedia hæv a guide:
     

    What in the fuck.



  • Digressed. We were talking about ERP system and particular backends. Also vulnerabilities - please guys, let's go easy on the math here. Not everybody has a degree that's worth the paper it's printed on.

    Now, to address the problems of data structures (here: storage coils) within a mixed backend: I don't think they're the primary choice for discombobulated rEEDs, but they are reasonably safe from buffer underflows when protected with .NET or later.



  • @davedavenotdavemaybedave said:

    @Medezark said:
    i don't know enough about dog grooming to make a valid judgement.
    Wikipedia has a guide: @Wikipaedia said:
    Dog grooming refers to actions deliberately undertaken with the aim of befriending and establishing an emotional connection with a dog, in order to lower the dog's inhibitions in preparation for abuse (such as canine sexual abuse) or exploitation (such as canine labour - see trafficking of puppies). Dog grooming may be used to lure dogs into sexual exploitation such as dog prostitution or the production of doggie pornography. Although worldwide case law has an inherently heterogeneous history of offenders, generally canine sexual abuse occurs at the hands of someone personally close and well known to that dog. Thus, abuse is usually preceded by grooming.

     

    OMG -- now I understand why PetSmart is so secretive about their dog grooming pricing policies.



  • @Shortjob said:

    Also vulnerabilities - please guys, let's go easy on the math here. Not everybody has a degree that's worth the paper it's printed on.

    I am lucky to have gotten into my university before they decided that everyone should get a Bachelor degree instead of a Diploma.



  • Haha, so did I. Go Team 2006 ^^



  • I also need a help.  I cannot enter this captcha



  •  @El_Heffe said:

    I also need a help.  I cannot enter this captcha

    ▓▓▓▓▓ biantii



  • @Xyro said:

    ▓▓▓▓▓ biantii

     

    You, sir, are a gentlemen among people.



  • @dhromed said:

    @Xyro said:
    ▓▓▓▓▓ biantii
    You, sir, are a gentlemen among people.

    He's also wrong. The real answer is obviously <font face="Arial Unicode MS">░▒▒▓▓▒▒</font> biantii.



  • @derula said:

    @dhromed said:
    @Xyro said:
    ▓▓▓▓▓ biantii
    You, sir, are a gentlemen among people.

    He's also wrong. The real answer is obviously <font face="Arial Unicode MS">░▒▒▓▓▒▒</font> biantii.

    But that's not even a real word!  Look closely at the pattern, dot density aside, there are clearly only 5 blocks.  It MIGHT spell<font face="Arial Unicode MS"> </font><font face="Arial Unicode MS">▒</font><font face="Arial Unicode MS">▒▓▓▒</font><font face="Arial Unicode MS">, if that made any sense.  As this is recaptcha, we can assume* that it spells out a word in some language, such as </font>▓▓▓▓▓.

    ▓▓▓▓▓, as defined by the New Oxford F▓▓▓ing Dictionary, defines ▓▓▓▓▓ as "a means in which to ▓▓▓▓ oneself" or, "a ▓▓▓▓er, one who ▓▓▓▓s," (chiefly British).  Obviously, that's what it's spelling, even if the word has been greatly distorted.



  •  @Xyro said:

    @derula said:

    @dhromed said:
    @Xyro said:
    ▓▓▓▓▓ biantii
    You, sir, are a gentlemen among people.

    He's also wrong. The real answer is obviously <font face="Arial Unicode MS">░▒▒▓▓▒▒</font> biantii.

    But that's not even a real word!  Look closely at the pattern, dot density aside, there are clearly only 5 blocks.  It MIGHT spell<font face="Arial Unicode MS"> </font><font face="Arial Unicode MS">▒</font><font face="Arial Unicode MS">▒▓▓▒</font><font face="Arial Unicode MS">, if that made any sense.  As this is recaptcha, we can assume* that it spells out a word in some language, such as </font>▓▓▓▓▓.

    ▓▓▓▓▓, as defined by the New Oxford F▓▓▓ing Dictionary, defines ▓▓▓▓▓ as "a means in which to ▓▓▓▓ oneself" or, "a ▓▓▓▓er, one who ▓▓▓▓s," (chiefly British).  Obviously, that's what it's spelling, even if the word has been greatly distorted.



  • ░▒▒▓▓▒▒ you, you're just jealous because I got the pattern more correct.



  • Did the OP ever come back?  Or did we scare him off?



  • @Medezark said:

    Did the OP ever come back?  Or did we scare him off?
    http://forums.thedailywtf.com/members/houda.aspx

    I sincerely wish to know how his homework assignment was completed...  I hope he took into account the magnetic field distortion induced by the retroencabulator. 



  • @Xyro said:

    @Medezark said:

    Did the OP ever come back?  Or did we scare him off?
    http://forums.thedailywtf.com/members/houda.aspx

    I sincerely wish to know how his homework assignment was completed...  I hope he took into account the magnetic field distortion induced by the retroencabulator. 

    Good work Xyro.


Log in to reply