Interesting business name registered in the UK.
-
@lucas1 said in Interesting business name registered in the UK.:
That is not really a rebuttal unless you are going to be a pedant and ignore the overall point.
You're the one who said it "was never that bad". Just pointing it out...
@loopback0 said in Interesting business name registered in the UK.:
@lucas1 said in Interesting business name registered in the UK.:
unless you are going to be a pedant and ignore the overall point
YMBNH.
Also, what he said :P
-
@loopback0 I know that is how other members here make themselves feel clever.
-
@sloosecannon said in Interesting business name registered in the UK.:
You're the one who said it "was never that bad". Just pointing it out...
It wasn't if you think in modern dev time which is a few months and not years.
-
@lucas1 said in Interesting business name registered in the UK.:
@loopback0 I know that is how other members here make themselves feel clever.
You're the one who posted something blatantly wrong. I'm just pointing out that it's wrong...
@lucas1 said in Interesting business name registered in the UK.:
@sloosecannon said in Interesting business name registered in the UK.:
You're the one who said it "was never that bad". Just pointing it out...
It wasn't if you think in modern dev time which is a few months and not years.
That's not what "never" means.
-
@sloosecannon said in Interesting business name registered in the UK.:
You're the one who posted something blatantly wrong. I'm just pointing out that it's wrong...
I didn't. Modern PHP is fine
There is nothing wrong with using supported versions of the language today.
-
@lucas1 said in Interesting business name registered in the UK.:
it was never that bad unless you are being a special snowflake.
@lucas1 said in Interesting business name registered in the UK.:
I didn't.
-.-
-
@sloosecannon I said Modern PHP is fine. There is nothing wrong with it.
-
@lucas1 said in Interesting business name registered in the UK.:
@sloosecannon I said Modern PHP is fine. There is nothing wrong with it.
And I'm not arguing with that statement. I don't know enough about the difference between the older shitty versions and 7.0 to argue. Maybe someone well-versed in PHP, like @Arantor can weigh in on that. Your other statement, however, was blatantly incorrect
-
@sloosecannon said in Interesting business name registered in the UK.:
Your other statement, however, was blatantly incorrect
What other statement?
-
@lucas1 said in Interesting business name registered in the UK.:
@sloosecannon said in Interesting business name registered in the UK.:
Your other statement, however, was blatantly incorrect
What other statement?
@lucas1 said in Interesting business name registered in the UK.:
tbh it was never that bad unless you are being a special snowflake.
-
@sloosecannon It wasn't. Grow a pair of hairy hairless balls. Also btw I wasn't being 100% serious.
Are you the sort of guy that things Anchorman is a documentary of news reporting in the 70s?
-
@sloosecannon said in Interesting business name registered in the UK.:
@lucas1 said in Interesting business name registered in the UK.:
Ease of deploy (basically FTP UP). If it is a .NET site there could be dll deploy etc nonsense.
That depends entirely on the environment. It could also literally take one click.
If you're using Visual Studio Online's source control, you can set up continuous integration, and get zero-click deployment!
But seriously, test your shit before putting it live plzkthx.
-
@RaceProUK and that doesn't quite work that well. Because I've just set that up today and use a VM in Azure and ignored the hosted controller because it would never connect.
I followed the instructions to the letter btw.
-
@lucas1 True, it can take a few tries to get it working properly. But once it does, you'll have about a year before MS deprecates it in favour of something that's ever so slightly harder to configure!
-
@RaceProUK Well the hosted controller would never do a build right (failed at 0 seconds). The "Default controller" would first time.
No errors, the only clue I got was some odd github thread.
the build worked my raspiberry pi before the online VM
Azure is shit
-
@lucas1 said in Interesting business name registered in the UK.:
Azure is shit
It's mostly that the error reporting is… well, there may as well be no error reporting, it's that useless. I remember once seeing all sorts of incomprehensible errors when trying to create a Logic App. I forget the exact message, but it was some garbage about resource groups or something. As it turns out, there's a limit on how many active Logic Apps you can have, and we'd hit that limit. Not that Azure would actually tell me that, of course.
-
@RaceProUK All I want is a log, not a log like Ali G but just an Error log telling me what was the problem. I was in the dark just clicking crap around hoping to get something working. and the only inkling was hosted app agents restricted somethings (not restricted anything I was using) so I thought fuck it lets use a build that isn't restricted.
-
@RaceProUK said in Interesting business name registered in the UK.:
As it turns out, there's a limit on how many active Logic Apps you can have, and we'd hit that limit. Not that Azure would actually tell me that, of course.
Yeah, A coworker ran into an issue where we apparently hit our limit for VM total processors on the account.
Wacky wacky wacky.
-
@tufty said in Interesting business name registered in the UK.:
@lucas1 Yeah, quite probably.
I just checked Stack Overflow's 2016 survey, which somehow placed PHP/JS/SQL over C#/JS/SQL. It's hilariously awful, even if you ignore the "Star Wars vs Star Trek" bullshit question. The top 3 "full stack" technologies are...
- PHP / JS / SQL (23%)
- C# / JS / SQL (21.7%)
- C# / JS / SQL Server (20.6%)
And the summary is...
More Full-Stack Developers work with PHP than with any other Back-End language
@Tw@wood may have left CockOverflow, but his spirit lives on.
And you missed: C#, SQL, SQL Server 17.2%!
Well, there's SQL C# JS and SQL, that's not got much SQL in it.
-
@boomzilla I wonder whether the people answering “C# / JS / SQL” even know what database they're using?
-
@dkf Or care.
as long as it's not Oracle
-
@dkf said in Interesting business name registered in the UK.:
@boomzilla I wonder whether the people answering “C# / JS / SQL” even know what database they're using?
I didn't see the survey questions. SQL Server seemed to be the only DB mentioned by name in the results, though.