Digital censorship for whites
-
from
https://www.artstation.com/coltonorr/store/bkX/basemesh-set-adam-eve
So, coloring the skin and adding a grid, makes it so I don't need pointless black lines over female nippes and crotch-bumps?
Speaking of, are said unmentionables customizable? Based on the color partitioning, I'd say no, and if not, well, there's something to be said about this artist's picture of "idea body figure"...
-
@Tsaukpaetra said in Digital censorship for whites:
So, coloring the skin and adding a grid, makes it so I don't need pointless black lines over female nippes and crotch-bumps?
Apparently.
Alternatively, rotating by some hard-to-determine ammount, or putting it in the background also works:
Edit: Good grief. Did I just make this thread NSFW?
Or... cropping?... idk
Avert your eyes! It's a representation of a topless lady
-
@Zecc you need an extra carriage return after your HTML tags before Markdumb takes effect again.
-
@Zecc said in Digital censorship for whites:
Avert your eyes! It's a representation of a topless lady
It's probably worth noting that the hidden image is of the top of a topless lady. Make of that what you will.
-
Adam and Eve.
Why do they have umbilici?
-
@PJH said in Digital censorship for whites:
Adam and Eve.
Why do they have umbilici?
Depends. If they are just some dude called Adam and a dudette called Eve, then they have parents, right?
If they are the Biblical Adam and Eve, well, er, I guess the Big Guy made them that way.
-
@Steve_The_Cynic said in Digital censorship for whites:
If they are the Biblical Adam and Eve, well, er, I guess the Big Guy made them that way.
Otherwise, try explaining to the kids why they're different.
-
-
When I read the title, I expected some InfoWars article.
-
@JBert said in Digital censorship for whites:
@Steve_The_Cynic said in Digital censorship for whites:
If they are the Biblical Adam and Eve, well, er, I guess the Big Guy made them that way.
Otherwise, try explaining to the kids why they're different.
I had wondered why that little detail was always omitted. Apparently incest wasn't immoral back then or...
-
I am deeply offended by these unrealistic standards.
-
@anonymous234 One assumes it's a deformable mesh.
-
-
@anonymous234 said in Digital censorship for whites:
I am deeply offended by these unrealistic standards.
Pearoast
-
@PJH My back is excessively chafed but I am striving every day.
-
@Tsaukpaetra said in Digital censorship for whites:
Apparently incest wasn't immoral back then or...
Incest wasn't prohibited until later. Quite a bit later.
-
@Tsaukpaetra said in Digital censorship for whites:
Speaking of, are said unmentionables customizable? Based on the color partitioning, I'd say no, and if not, well, there's something to be said about this artist's picture of "idea body figure"...
More importantly, why are people still making human character models in a world where DAZ, Mixamo Fuse et al. exist?
What clothing is compatible with this pair of figures compared to the vast library for Victoria/Michael 4? How about pose and animation libraries?
-
@Groaner said in Digital censorship for whites:
@Tsaukpaetra said in Digital censorship for whites:
Speaking of, are said unmentionables customizable? Based on the color partitioning, I'd say no, and if not, well, there's something to be said about this artist's picture of "idea body figure"...
More importantly, why are people still making human character models in a world where DAZ, Mixamo Fuse et al. exist?
What clothing is compatible with this pair of figures compared to the vast library for Victoria/Michael 4? How about pose and animation libraries?
You aren't the only one here with the same question. I have many gigabytes of, er, stuff, shall we say, in my DAZ Studio content library. Of course, none of it is directly usable in ZBrush, but...
-
@JBert said in Digital censorship for whites:
@Steve_The_Cynic said in Digital censorship for whites:
If they are the Biblical Adam and Eve, well, er, I guess the Big Guy made them that way.
Otherwise, try explaining to the kids why they're different.
"The Big Guy made them that way" works well(1) for that, too.
(1) For some definition of "well", of course.
-
@Steve_The_Cynic said in Digital censorship for whites:
@Groaner said in Digital censorship for whites:
@Tsaukpaetra said in Digital censorship for whites:
Speaking of, are said unmentionables customizable? Based on the color partitioning, I'd say no, and if not, well, there's something to be said about this artist's picture of "idea body figure"...
More importantly, why are people still making human character models in a world where DAZ, Mixamo Fuse et al. exist?
What clothing is compatible with this pair of figures compared to the vast library for Victoria/Michael 4? How about pose and animation libraries?
You aren't the only one here with the same question. I have many gigabytes of, er, stuff, shall we say, in my DAZ Studio content library. Of course, none of it is directly usable in ZBrush, but...
I thought there was a bridge between ZBrush and DAZ?
Getting a rigged figure from one 3D program to another has always been a hassle, and most programs are only good at one thing.
For example, I picked up an iClone license earlier this year for remapping animations to the Genesis rig, and was amazed at how you could get renders in near real-time with it, as opposed to 1 FPS (if you're lucky) in DAZ with straight OpenGL rendering. Problem is, to render in iClone, you have to export your character in FBX and remember to export any morph sliders if you plan on using any of them, and if you need to do substantial tweaking to the character on the DAZ side, you basically have to redo the whole process.
DAZ needs a better integrated real-time renderer (or preview, for that matter). Granted, the polycounts aren't conducive to that, and the target market is more for the raytracing/photorealism crowd.
-
@anonymous234 said in Digital censorship for whites:
I am deeply offended by these unrealistic standards.
I'm jealous at best.
-
@anotherusername said in Digital censorship for whites:
@Tsaukpaetra said in Digital censorship for whites:
Apparently incest wasn't immoral back then or...
Incest wasn't prohibited until later. Quite a bit later.
Well, if we're taking the religious fiction seriously, and literally as all good nutters should, in order for the species to propagate, it was basically mandatory.
And if you squint and tilt your head just right, twice over - Gen 1-3* (Adam and Eve) and Gen 6-9* (Noah and family)
* I'd've quoted from the Quran as well, but it would have been a bit messy (passages all over the place.)
-
@anonymous234 said in Digital censorship for whites:
I am deeply offended by these unrealistic standards.
There are only two things that set me apart from heavily-muscled and super-fit men:
- My body fat percentage
- My muscle mass
-
@Groaner said in Digital censorship for whites:
What clothing is compatible with this pair of figures compared to the vast library for Victoria/Michael 4? How about pose and animation libraries?
Yeah, how will people make their CGI porn? The only purpose of Daz3D, as far as I can figure.
-
@topspin said in Digital censorship for whites:
@anonymous234 said in Digital censorship for whites:
I am deeply offended by these unrealistic standards.
I'm
jealousenvious at best.
-
@blakeyrat said in Digital censorship for whites:
@Groaner said in Digital censorship for whites:
What clothing is compatible with this pair of figures compared to the vast library for Victoria/Michael 4? How about pose and animation libraries?
Yeah, how will people make their CGI porn? The only purpose of Daz3D, as far as I can figure.
I use it for a good chunk of the assets in a game project. In their base form, the polycounts are too high for real-time use, but there are a couple extensions to decimate the meshes to something reasonable and shrink/combine the textures to reduce draw calls.
So what if some people use it to render porn? What harm does it do you, apart from the permanent retinal damage?
-
@boomzilla said in Digital censorship for whites:
@topspin said in Digital censorship for whites:
I'm
jealousenvious at best.The Simpsons explain it best
-
@boomzilla I saw that coming, actually already had @TimeBandit's Simpsons clip in mind.
Still, it felt like the more common phrase to say.
-
@mott555 said in Digital censorship for whites:
@anonymous234 said in Digital censorship for whites:
I am deeply offended by these unrealistic standards.
There are only two things that set me apart from heavily-muscled and super-fit men:
- My body fat percentage
- My muscle mass
- My staring-at-a-screen-all-day posture
- My stamina*
* no giggity
-
-
@Groaner said in Digital censorship for whites:
@Steve_The_Cynic said in Digital censorship for whites:
@Groaner said in Digital censorship for whites:
@Tsaukpaetra said in Digital censorship for whites:
Speaking of, are said unmentionables customizable? Based on the color partitioning, I'd say no, and if not, well, there's something to be said about this artist's picture of "idea body figure"...
More importantly, why are people still making human character models in a world where DAZ, Mixamo Fuse et al. exist?
What clothing is compatible with this pair of figures compared to the vast library for Victoria/Michael 4? How about pose and animation libraries?
You aren't the only one here with the same question. I have many gigabytes of, er, stuff, shall we say, in my DAZ Studio content library. Of course, none of it is directly usable in ZBrush, but...
I thought there was a bridge between ZBrush and DAZ?
Check out that phrase I used: "none of it is directly usable in ZBrush". That's compatible with "there is a DAZ Studio-to-ZBrush bridge".
-
@Groaner said in Digital censorship for whites:
So what if some people use it to render porn? What harm does it do you, apart from the permanent retinal damage?
Did I say it harmed me somewhere? I certainly don't recall typing that...
I just find it funny that there's a whole 3D software package and asset store that's used for nothing but making CGI porn.
-
@blakeyrat said in Digital censorship for whites:
@Groaner said in Digital censorship for whites:
So what if some people use it to render porn? What harm does it do you, apart from the permanent retinal damage?
Did I say it harmed me somewhere? I certainly don't recall typing that...
I just find it funny that there's a whole 3D software package and asset store that's used for nothing but making CGI porn.
What was the purpose of your question about porn then? You'll excuse us for trying to converse with you like a HOOMAN. BEEP BOOOP
-
"how will people make 3D porn?" == "I AM HARMED BY 3D PORN MADE IN DAZ3D!!!" according to idiots on DailyWTF.
Lesson learned. I guess.
-
@blakeyrat My house is now filled with rabid wolves thanks to YOUR APATHY on this issue.
-
-
@blakeyrat said in Digital censorship for whites:
I just find it funny that there's a whole 3D software package and asset store that's used for nothing but making CGI porn.
Also, the DAZ store is relatively tame. You probably want Renderotica (obviously NSFW).
If that amuses you, also consider that an actual person was digitized and used as the basis of Michael 4, and now his likeness is all over the Internet engaging in various lewd acts.
-
@Groaner Now that this has gone full NSFW it might as well ask: what is "Michael 4"?
-
@topspin said in Digital censorship for whites:
@Groaner Now that this has gone full NSFW it might as well ask: what is "Michael 4"?
Michael 4 Base
Meet Mr. Right - Michael 4! Download Michael 4 Male 3D Model today and learn what a truly cutting-edge 3D male figure can be. This is the most versatile, realistic, and anatomically accurate male human figure ever made available for p
The 4 signifies the fourth generation. While we're currently on the eighth generation, a large majority of content is designed to be compatible with fourth-generation figures, as compatibility with Poser starts to diverge around generation 5.
Here's a good summary of the evolution of Michael (DAZ's most famous male character) and Victoria (DAZ's most famous female character).
-
@Groaner Is/are the wang/s (a) separate version histor(y/ies)?
-
@Gribnit said in Digital censorship for whites:
@Groaner Is/are the wang/s (a) separate version histor(y/ies)?
That exists as a separate package. I think it's included in one of the pro bundles. Are you looking to create some husbandoes?
-
@Groaner nope, just really interested in repo management.
-
-
@Gribnit said in Digital censorship for whites:
My house is now filled with rabid wolves thanks to YOUR APATHY on this issue.
You're Zippy, aren't you?
-
@PJH Feminists have been talking about He-Man and unrealistic standards of masculinity for a long loooong time.
-
@Captain said in Digital censorship for whites:
@PJH Feminists have been talking about He-Man and unrealistic standards of masculinity for a long loooong time.
Yeah, but what's their take?
-
@admiral_p said in Digital censorship for whites:
@Captain said in Digital censorship for whites:
@PJH Feminists have been talking about He-Man and unrealistic standards of masculinity for a long loooong time.
Yeah, but what's their take?
He-Man should be renamed to They-Person.
-
@admiral_p said in Digital censorship for whites:
Yeah, but what's their take?
Toxic masculinity is a narrow and repressive description of manhood, designating manhood as defined by violence, sex, status and aggression. It’s the cultural ideal of manliness, where strength is everything while emotions are a weakness; where sex and brutality are yardsticks by which men are measured, while supposedly “feminine” traits—which can range from emotional vulnerability to simply not being hypersexual—are the means by which your status as “man” can be taken away.
-
@loopback0 said in Digital censorship for whites:
@admiral_p said in Digital censorship for whites:
@Captain said in Digital censorship for whites:
@PJH Feminists have been talking about He-Man and unrealistic standards of masculinity for a long loooong time.
Yeah, but what's their take?
He-Man should be renamed to They-Pers
oyn.FTFY
Victoria (3D figure) - Wikipedia
