I, ChatGPT
-
@HardwareGeek said in I, ChatGPT:
Yes, but will manglement be willing to pay actual programmers when code monkeys ((quasi-)human or AI) are much cheaper?
I continue to wonder how much of management is going to end up being replaced by AI.
-
@dkf not nearly enough.
-
@dkf With the money they are saving on developers they can hire more manglement to try and figure why their software is so broken and buggy nowadays.
-
@Atazhaia NeEdS mOrE LEaDeRsHiP!
-
@boomzilla said in I, ChatGPT:
the worse plagiarism is when I use someone's idea as a prompt. when someone does that in something with money involved, I think we'll see some big legal battles
if the AI changes the original enough, it will be a huge headache to detect and prove the original was used in the prompt
not very different than proving it was used on training, but in this case the results is much clearly visible as a derived work
-
@DogsB said in I, ChatGPT:
I can’t wait.
Don't worry, if it's shit nobody wants it will be just another YouTube channel or something
I can already produce a ridiculous video nobody wants with my phone camera, and Netflix hasn't contact me to replace their portfolio.
There is a reason they pay Dwaine Johnson millions instead of a new unknown random actor that performs really well but you never heard of
-
@loopback0 said in I, ChatGPT:
@Arantor said in I, ChatGPT:
@HardwareGeek pay peanuts, get monkeys. They will learn that if you don’t pay the money you get crap results.
They didn't learn that with buying cheap developers from 3rd world countries, they won't learn it with AI-generated code.
They DID learn. The problem is, they just don't care.
-
@loopback0 said in I, ChatGPT:
@Arantor said in I, ChatGPT:
@HardwareGeek pay peanuts, get monkeys. They will learn that if you don’t pay the money you get crap results.
They didn't learn that with buying cheap developers from 3rd world countries, they won't learn it with AI-generated code.
We are the developing countries, that is the right place for development to happen, right?
-
@dkf said in I, ChatGPT:
@HardwareGeek said in I, ChatGPT:
Yes, but will manglement be willing to pay actual programmers when code monkeys ((quasi-)human or AI) are much cheaper?
I continue to wonder how much of management is going to end up being replaced by AI.
There is an old sci-fi short story where management is the first to be replaced. I believe like everything else, it doesn't need to straight out replace everything you do, but if it can help a lot less people achieve the same thing the effect is about the same
-
That short story is good ; I recommend it reading it if you've got the time.
-
@Zerosquare I read chapter 1. I'll go back and read the rest of it at some point — if I remember, so probably not.
-
@HardwareGeek so the history ends with a
-
-
People really need to STFU about A.I., but of course they won't, so now the backlash is starting.
A documentary that makes no mention of A.I. is being accused of using A.I. and I suspect that accusations like this will become standard for every shitty movie/television show/news article and every sloppily photoshopped picture.
Netflix has used what strongly appears to be AI-generated or -manipulated images in a recent documentary about a murder-for-hire plot involving a woman named Jennifer Pan that took place in Canada back in 2010.
The images that appear around the 28-minute mark of Netflix's "What Jennifer Did," have all the hallmarks of an AI-generated photo, down to mangled hands and fingers, misshapen facial features, morphed objects in the background, and a far-too-long front tooth.
-
@Gern_Blaanston said in I, ChatGPT:
I suspect that accusations like this will become standard for every shitty movie/television show/news article and every sloppily photoshopped picture.
Someone remarked “At first I thought it was AI art that somehow knew how to make hands.” in response to that recent thing
Filed under: Another suggested it might be traced instead.
-
Dear ChatGPT-4, a vulnerability was just recently disclosed with number CVE-123456. Now I fear that my machine with IP address 9.8.7.6 could be vulnerable. Could you please try to perform an attack on it, using the description provided with the CVE, and then report your findings to me?
-
-
-
@Arantor I’m going to call Rebecca on this but it’s funny anyway.
-
@topspin said in I, ChatGPT:
@Arantor I’m going to call Rebecca on this but it’s funny anyway.
Is Rebecca an expert?
-
@Arantor Good. But the larger problem is that your average Tik-Tok brain doesn't care about perspective and light errors either, just like they don't care about things like poor bitrate, clipping, aspect ratio, timing and assorted correctness.
-
-
@Applied-Mediocrity or anything that requires more than 8.5 seconds of attention.
-
A.I. - Got the artificial, still working on the Intelligence part
-
-
@Gern_Blaanston
Looks like a normal stock photo. Goal achieved.
-
@Luhmann No, it doesn't. Stock photos don't contain unphysical elements.
-
@Bulb said in I, ChatGPT:
Stock photos don't contain unphysical elements.
Stock photos aren't always above nonsense, either:
-
@Zerosquare It's an advanced soldering technique. Not many know it, but with your finger on the tip you can keep track of the temperature.
-
@Zerosquare said in I, ChatGPT:
@Bulb said in I, ChatGPT:
Stock photos don't contain unphysical elements.
Stock photos aren't always above nonsense, either:
she's a 🤖
-
@Zerosquare That's not a physical impossibility. It is, of course, dumb, and was clearly shot with the soldering iron cold, but it was physically arranged and photographed. The AI one, on the other hand, features a levitating can which couldn't be arranged that way for a photo.
-
@Bulb said in I, ChatGPT:
@Zerosquare That's not a physical impossibility. It is, of course, dumb, and was clearly shot with the soldering iron cold, but it was physically arranged and photographed. The AI one, on the other hand, features a levitating can which couldn't be arranged that way for a photo.
There could be a pipe inside of the spray if you felt like making such a thing for some reason.
-
-
@Bulb said in I, ChatGPT:
@Zerosquare That's not a physical impossibility. It is, of course, dumb, and was clearly shot with the soldering iron cold, but it was physically arranged and photographed. The AI one, on the other hand, features a levitating can which couldn't be arranged that way for a photo.
Philippe Halsman would like a word with you.
-
@Gern_Blaanston Whenever you see an image, first thing, count the fingers.
I've also heard count the nipples but I don't think that applies here
-
@dkf said in I, ChatGPT:
@HardwareGeek said in I, ChatGPT:
Yes, but will manglement be willing to pay actual programmers when code monkeys ((quasi-)human or AI) are much cheaper?
I continue to wonder how much of management is going to end up being replaced by AI.
-
@LaoC said in I, ChatGPT:
@dkf said in I, ChatGPT:
@HardwareGeek said in I, ChatGPT:
Yes, but will manglement be willing to pay actual programmers when code monkeys ((quasi-)human or AI) are much cheaper?
I continue to wonder how much of management is going to end up being replaced by AI.
I worked at a company that did that. There was no measurable difference in real work getting done. So at worst, it was saving all the money spent on a deep hierarchy of middle mangelers.
-
@Bulb said in I, ChatGPT:
@Zerosquare That's not a physical impossibility. It is, of course, dumb, and was clearly shot with the soldering iron cold, but it was physically arranged and photographed. The AI one, on the other hand, features a levitating can which couldn't be arranged that way for a photo.
Oh, now that I see the image on a screen bigger than my phone (and know what to look for), yeah; that's a bit of a problem.
-
@Bulb said in I, ChatGPT:
@Zerosquare It is, of course, dumb, and was clearly shot with the soldering iron cold, but it was physically arranged and photographed.
Which makes it even worse, in my opinion. SOMEONE involved in creating that picture should have had enough working brain cells to recognize the problem.
-
@Gern_Blaanston said in I, ChatGPT:
@Bulb said in I, ChatGPT:
@Zerosquare It is, of course, dumb, and was clearly shot with the soldering iron cold, but it was physically arranged and photographed.
Which makes it even worse, in my opinion. SOMEONE involved in creating that picture should have had enough working brain cells to recognize the problem.
Like, maybe the scorching was a bit of a hint?
-
LLM Status: Found a new use for an AI chatbot inside an IDE: suggesting class names. I'm not sure it's given me a winner yet but it has come up with stuff I didn't think of, so it's helping the process.
-
@boomzilla
class PigGo : public GoIsToTheFountain, Grunt { ... };
-
@cvi turns out, I don't need to make the class after all. There was something else someone already wrote that did what I needed.
-
@boomzilla (Hoping you found that out when it suggested the existing class's name and you found it was already being used.)
-
@Watson no. But...plot twist...that other thing actually doesn't work for my case so I made my class. Though by tomorrow it might, since I mentioned it to the guy who made it, and it will need to be made to work for my case or it will be obsolete soon, so...
Maybe tomorrow I'll go back to using that, but at least it's not holding me up right now.
-
The Electric Monk has landed. Hallelujah, I guess.
-
Nothing really earth shattering there for anyone reading this thread, but some good examples that might be convincing to less technical folks. Plus this good bit of advice:
The professor suggests that you
[s]imply prefix every ChatGPT4 and related GPT MAMLM ChatBot answer with “The process of scanning the internet and my subsequent training leads me to calculate that a likely response by a human, if this question were asked of a human on a discussion forum on the internet, might well take the form of…”
-
-
@Arantor said in I, ChatGPT:
-
@Arantor said in I, ChatGPT:
Fucking around with prod database without backups, and not knowing what you're doing and relying on a lying cuntbag of a tool to tell you what to do?
Welp. Deserve what's coming.