Of course, you did add a test case to your unit testing so this will never happen again, right?
notromda
@notromda
Best posts made by notromda
-
RE: The middle "boundary condition"
Latest posts made by notromda
-
RE: Heroku
The real WTF is that you are complaining about tools that you obvious don't understand. Heroku is not just a virtual host provider, they provide an easy to manage way to deploy rails applications - and so you probably need to know the whole ecosystem of rails for it to make sense. I would probably be equally confused and frustrated trying to deploy a java system. I vaguely remember something about .war files... wtf? ;)
Heroku does not allow direct logins to the vm; you have to use their tools to perform actions. If you just need to grab the data, I would suggest a database dump:
https://devcenter.heroku.com/articles/heroku-postgres-import-export
or
https://devcenter.heroku.com/articles/pgbackups
-
RE: Rule implementations
@TheCPUWizard said:
Software is not done until the last running instance has been removed from production, and it is demonstrably proven that the data will never be needed again!
... or when no one has the budget to pay for any more work on it.
-
RE: Southwest Airlines glitch
@Speakerphone Dude said:
I frequently get billed twice when I prepay
@Speakerphone Dude said:I think the problem is that some customers don't learn
@Speakerphone Dude said:Damn those stupid customers.
I think you need to sit down and think about that for a bit....
-
RE: If I had the power I would just fire him.
What do the log files say when checking in a blank line? If the log says "integrating ...." or such, then it is obviously a false entry, and I'd fire him.
-
RE: But we wanna do it this way
@ShatteredArm said:
1. Tell users they're getting Option 1, and it will take a year.
2. Do Option 2 in two months.
3. Take a ten month vacation.
That's exactly what I was going to suggest...
-
RE: It works, it's not hard to figure out, but, but, but......
@rstinejr said:
Or maybe it's the stunning opacity and inelegance when compared to
public Foo getFoo() { if (_foo == null) _foo = new Foo();
return _foo;
}
If you want to talk elegance, I much prefer the ruby way of doing this which makes your elegance look clunky:
def getFoo @foo ||= Foo.new end
-
RE: Any ideas on this one?
@blakeyrat said:
Besides, we're talking about Windows-- if you're using Windows, you're probably doing something wrong.
FTFY
-
RE: Don't name yourself me
Looks as if they locked the thread. Basically, everyone whoever posted a bug report got a notification for a ticket, because of a bug where someone registered as username "me".
-
Don't name yourself me
This morning I found a weird bug trackerupdate in my email... and so did a bunch of others. Look at the econd comment on:
http://youtrack.jetbrains.net/issue/WI-6497?projectKey=WI
(The bug in that link is not the issue, the fact that *everyone* got the email is.)