Amazon has more stuff than it knows what to do with
-
@boomzilla said in Amazon has more stuff than it knows what to do with:
@LaoC said in Amazon has more stuff than it knows what to do with:
@boomzilla said in Amazon has more stuff than it knows what to do with:
@LaoC said in Amazon has more stuff than it knows what to do with:
@boomzilla said in Amazon has more stuff than it knows what to do with:
@LaoC said in Amazon has more stuff than it knows what to do with:
@Gribnit said in Amazon has more stuff than it knows what to do with:
@e4tmyl33t said in Amazon has more stuff than it knows what to do with:
And why would it need to be a "menu" as such? Just arrange for weekly/bi-weekly deliveries of a bunch of vegetables, some varied meats, etc. and the people can make what they want with them.
Still fails. Central planning more granular than thevery high level (power of purse, contract onerousness, rights) is fail. It can't scale properly.
Hence the utter failure that is Walmart.
TDEMSYR. IIRC, this isn't the first time you've said this, either.
And?
And I'm sure you will again because you seem to actually believe any of it makes sense.
Surely the last rebuttal was equally well argued, so yes.
It contained as much argument as you provided, except that it was correct. But please do enlighten us about how you believe Walmart demonstrates the plausibility of central planning of economies if you'd like for a detailed rebuttal.
See above.
-
@LaoC said in Amazon has more stuff than it knows what to do with:
@boomzilla said in Amazon has more stuff than it knows what to do with:
@LaoC said in Amazon has more stuff than it knows what to do with:
@boomzilla said in Amazon has more stuff than it knows what to do with:
@LaoC said in Amazon has more stuff than it knows what to do with:
@boomzilla said in Amazon has more stuff than it knows what to do with:
@LaoC said in Amazon has more stuff than it knows what to do with:
@Gribnit said in Amazon has more stuff than it knows what to do with:
@e4tmyl33t said in Amazon has more stuff than it knows what to do with:
And why would it need to be a "menu" as such? Just arrange for weekly/bi-weekly deliveries of a bunch of vegetables, some varied meats, etc. and the people can make what they want with them.
Still fails. Central planning more granular than thevery high level (power of purse, contract onerousness, rights) is fail. It can't scale properly.
Hence the utter failure that is Walmart.
TDEMSYR. IIRC, this isn't the first time you've said this, either.
And?
And I'm sure you will again because you seem to actually believe any of it makes sense.
Surely the last rebuttal was equally well argued, so yes.
It contained as much argument as you provided, except that it was correct. But please do enlighten us about how you believe Walmart demonstrates the plausibility of central planning of economies if you'd like for a detailed rebuttal.
See above.
Ah, I see, taking the intellectual coward
way out. Fair enough.
-
@boomzilla said in Amazon has more stuff than it knows what to do with:
@LaoC said in Amazon has more stuff than it knows what to do with:
@boomzilla said in Amazon has more stuff than it knows what to do with:
@LaoC said in Amazon has more stuff than it knows what to do with:
@boomzilla said in Amazon has more stuff than it knows what to do with:
@LaoC said in Amazon has more stuff than it knows what to do with:
@boomzilla said in Amazon has more stuff than it knows what to do with:
@LaoC said in Amazon has more stuff than it knows what to do with:
@Gribnit said in Amazon has more stuff than it knows what to do with:
@e4tmyl33t said in Amazon has more stuff than it knows what to do with:
And why would it need to be a "menu" as such? Just arrange for weekly/bi-weekly deliveries of a bunch of vegetables, some varied meats, etc. and the people can make what they want with them.
Still fails. Central planning more granular than thevery high level (power of purse, contract onerousness, rights) is fail. It can't scale properly.
Hence the utter failure that is Walmart.
TDEMSYR. IIRC, this isn't the first time you've said this, either.
And?
And I'm sure you will again because you seem to actually believe any of it makes sense.
Surely the last rebuttal was equally well argued, so yes.
It contained as much argument as you provided, except that it was correct. But please do enlighten us about how you believe Walmart demonstrates the plausibility of central planning of economies if you'd like for a detailed rebuttal.
See above.
Ah, I see, taking the intellectual coward
way out. Fair enough.I don't have @gaska's patience to explain trivial logic to you only to have you ignore it. Call that however you like.
-
@LaoC said in Amazon has more stuff than it knows what to do with:
@boomzilla said in Amazon has more stuff than it knows what to do with:
@LaoC said in Amazon has more stuff than it knows what to do with:
@boomzilla said in Amazon has more stuff than it knows what to do with:
@LaoC said in Amazon has more stuff than it knows what to do with:
@boomzilla said in Amazon has more stuff than it knows what to do with:
@LaoC said in Amazon has more stuff than it knows what to do with:
@boomzilla said in Amazon has more stuff than it knows what to do with:
@LaoC said in Amazon has more stuff than it knows what to do with:
@Gribnit said in Amazon has more stuff than it knows what to do with:
@e4tmyl33t said in Amazon has more stuff than it knows what to do with:
And why would it need to be a "menu" as such? Just arrange for weekly/bi-weekly deliveries of a bunch of vegetables, some varied meats, etc. and the people can make what they want with them.
Still fails. Central planning more granular than thevery high level (power of purse, contract onerousness, rights) is fail. It can't scale properly.
Hence the utter failure that is Walmart.
TDEMSYR. IIRC, this isn't the first time you've said this, either.
And?
And I'm sure you will again because you seem to actually believe any of it makes sense.
Surely the last rebuttal was equally well argued, so yes.
It contained as much argument as you provided, except that it was correct. But please do enlighten us about how you believe Walmart demonstrates the plausibility of central planning of economies if you'd like for a detailed rebuttal.
See above.
Ah, I see, taking the intellectual coward
way out. Fair enough.I don't have @gaska's patience to explain trivial logic to you only to have you ignore it. Call that however you like.
Sure, double down on dumb and go full Mason Wheeler to boot!
-
@LaoC said in Amazon has more stuff than it knows what to do with:
@boomzilla said in Amazon has more stuff than it knows what to do with:
@LaoC said in Amazon has more stuff than it knows what to do with:
@boomzilla said in Amazon has more stuff than it knows what to do with:
@LaoC said in Amazon has more stuff than it knows what to do with:
@boomzilla said in Amazon has more stuff than it knows what to do with:
@LaoC said in Amazon has more stuff than it knows what to do with:
@boomzilla said in Amazon has more stuff than it knows what to do with:
@LaoC said in Amazon has more stuff than it knows what to do with:
@Gribnit said in Amazon has more stuff than it knows what to do with:
@e4tmyl33t said in Amazon has more stuff than it knows what to do with:
And why would it need to be a "menu" as such? Just arrange for weekly/bi-weekly deliveries of a bunch of vegetables, some varied meats, etc. and the people can make what they want with them.
Still fails. Central planning more granular than thevery high level (power of purse, contract onerousness, rights) is fail. It can't scale properly.
Hence the utter failure that is Walmart.
TDEMSYR. IIRC, this isn't the first time you've said this, either.
And?
And I'm sure you will again because you seem to actually believe any of it makes sense.
Surely the last rebuttal was equally well argued, so yes.
It contained as much argument as you provided, except that it was correct. But please do enlighten us about how you believe Walmart demonstrates the plausibility of central planning of economies if you'd like for a detailed rebuttal.
See above.
Ah, I see, taking the intellectual coward
way out. Fair enough.I don't have @gaska's patience to explain trivial logic to you only to have you ignore it. Call that however you like.
for 
. I've lost my patient too.
-
@Gąska said in Amazon has more stuff than it knows what to do with:
I've lost my patient
Practicing medicine without a license?
-
@HardwareGeek practicing? I'm more of a theory crafting guy. The patient did it to himself.
-
@Gąska said in Amazon has more stuff than it knows what to do with:
@error 9.9
.9999% uptime, eh?FTFY
-
@BernieTheBernie said in Amazon has more stuff than it knows what to do with:
@dkf said in Amazon has more stuff than it knows what to do with:
@BernieTheBernie said in Amazon has more stuff than it knows what to do with:
Look:
So interesting. Much wow.
What did you do? Why do you block lh3.googleusercontent.com?
Or is it google to show you the finger?The Mormons, they're everywhere
-
Google Photos WTF...
Here is your ice cream:
-
@boomzilla said in Amazon has more stuff than it knows what to do with:
@LaoC said in Amazon has more stuff than it knows what to do with:
@boomzilla said in Amazon has more stuff than it knows what to do with:
@LaoC said in Amazon has more stuff than it knows what to do with:
@boomzilla said in Amazon has more stuff than it knows what to do with:
@LaoC said in Amazon has more stuff than it knows what to do with:
@boomzilla said in Amazon has more stuff than it knows what to do with:
@LaoC said in Amazon has more stuff than it knows what to do with:
@Gribnit said in Amazon has more stuff than it knows what to do with:
@e4tmyl33t said in Amazon has more stuff than it knows what to do with:
And why would it need to be a "menu" as such? Just arrange for weekly/bi-weekly deliveries of a bunch of vegetables, some varied meats, etc. and the people can make what they want with them.
Still fails. Central planning more granular than thevery high level (power of purse, contract onerousness, rights) is fail. It can't scale properly.
Hence the utter failure that is Walmart.
TDEMSYR. IIRC, this isn't the first time you've said this, either.
And?
And I'm sure you will again because you seem to actually believe any of it makes sense.
Surely the last rebuttal was equally well argued, so yes.
It contained as much argument as you provided, except that it was correct. But please do enlighten us about how you believe Walmart demonstrates the plausibility of central planning of economies if you'd like for a detailed rebuttal.
See above.
Ah, I see, taking the intellectual coward
way out. Fair enough.Good God, you have the temerity to bang that drum, while you throw emojum and run.
-
@BernieTheBernie said in Amazon has more stuff than it knows what to do with:
Google Photos WTF...
Here is your ice cream:
That stuff is better than anything I've ever gotten from Walmart.
OK, maybe central planning is no good after all .
-
@BernieTheBernie It's a Good Humor popsicle; of course it's in Google Photos under "ice cream". That it's actually durian sorbet shouldn't matter.
