Firefox Users Can't Keep Up, all your grumpy cats are mine.
-
FF users can't get in here now. Discuss Grumpy Cat at will. JLJLJLJLJLJLJLJLJLJLJLJLJLJLJLJLJLJLJLJLJLJLJLJLJLJLJLJLJLJLJLJLJLJLJLJLJLJLJLJLJLJLJLJLJLJLJLJLJL[omitted]
-
Which is why I went back to Chrome because it was fucking with Firefox too much.
-
Mobile view still works in Firefox.
-
Oh wait. I see someone just did the same stunt I did, though not to the lengths I went to. Well played, sir, well played.
-
CURSES
-
Not that it's all that important, I just felt like screwing with the few poor people that still hang on to Firefox despite how badly they've screwed their browser up lately.
-
Yes, I just realised I was still on Firefox 27, did an upgrade and was like wtf?
-
I'm one of the few people still hanging
onFirefox.Is there an addon for Chrome that replicates Panorama yet?
-
-
I'm one of the few people still hanging on Firefox.
I still use FF for specific reasons, primarily because Chrome explicitly prohibits any plug-in that could download a YouTube video to watch later, offline. But I've pretty much moved entirely to Chrome for general use.
-
Repli-whatta-cates now?
It's the facilitation of having too many tabs open thing:I still use FF for specific reasons, primarily because Chrome explicitly prohibits any plug-in that could download a YouTube video to watch later, offline.
Try clipconverter.ccFair warning: while I've disabled AdBlock over there, I don't know what it looks like without noscript blocking third parties.
-
I still use FF for specific reasons, primarily because Chrome explicitly prohibits any plug-in that could download a YouTube video to watch later, offline
That was the only reason I still had FF installed, but at last attempt youtube had broken the plugin I used to use for that, and I never bothered to replace/update it.
-
no idea, never used tab grouping at all myself.
-
why is this in "Funny stuff"?
-
because there was no grumpy cats sub-forum
-
and if you were using firefox, apparently you'd know why? I don't have FF installed myself, I'm just going by the feedback of other users that do.
-
if you were using firefox
And using Desktop View. The <kbd> things don't display the same way in Mobile View (like I mentioned in the Likes thread and @fatbull confirmed above), so I'd assume Firefox doesn't choke in Mobile View.
-
Well, it doesn't just break Firefox but also other Gecko-based browsers.
Which is why I said "Firefoxes" in the other thread.
-
I think this is the perfect place to use the term "FOAD".
I actually left it here for a few minutes until the WM decided that it's time to throw the "Fuck it. It's dead. Force quit?" dialog at me.
-
Bereft of life, it has gone to meet its maker? It has ceased to be? Metabolic processes have stopped?
-
I also stopped pumping messages to the GUI thread. @bridget99 would be proud.
Filed under: I hope I remember the participants of that war correctly
-
But was it in VB and did you build that GUI to track IP addresses? Inquiring minds need to know.
-
I haven't touched anything BASIC since Q. And that didn't even know what an IP is.
-
I bet someone has been insane enough to implement TCP/IP in QBASIC and all the connectivity to the outside world.
-
Some things are better left ungoogled.
-
-
The guy that connected his ancient Mac to the internet is a great example
-
-
-
I'd like. Dicsoares disapproves.
-
I have no more likes for 15 hours.
-
Every time I read one of those misspellings I imagine this guy saying it.
Filed under: Guybrush Atwood
-
I want to like that post.
-
+101000
Best I can do at this time.
-
I still use FF for specific reasons, primarily because Chrome explicitly prohibits any plug-in that could download a YouTube video to watch later, offline. But I've pretty much moved entirely to Chrome for general use.
There's a developer version of YoutubeCenter which has video downloading, or did the last time I wanted to download a video.
-
?
-
Impressive firefoxfu? More likely, I am guessing that it's been patched already?
-
More likely, I am guessing that it's been patched already?
It was CSS'd around:
p kbd kbd kbd kbd kbd { display: none; }
Was added by @PJH.
-
Ya I thought so - since it only shows 5 kbds nested anymore
-
since half the bugs involve hideous nesting methods, maybe he should just put css in like:
div.cooked * * * * * * * * * * {display:none;}
because really, what situation requires nesting 10 elements deep inside the cooked post content.
-
though I honestly don't know that you can use the *s nested like that in CSS... never tried that myself and CBA to do it at work.
-
Was added by @PJH.
It was suggested I terminate at 1 level but used
xkcd_rnd() +1
to leave some creativity behind...If given a reasonable use case/other argument, I can increase it. (Unless upstream kill it completely with a fix).
-
though I honestly don't know that you can use the *s nested like that in CSS... never tried that myself and CBA to do it at work.
I'll have a look tomorrow...
-
Hrm, was going to suggest some CSS that would let you keep all of the nested <kbd> content, but would drop the nested look, but it seems Firefox chokes on just so many items to display, no matter the styles.
For reference, this is what I was trying:
kbd kbd { border: none; margin: 0; padding: 0; display: inline-block; border-radius: 0; box-shadow: none; }
But Firefox still hung after getting rid of your style. Definitely seems to be a Firefox bug.
For reference, this is what it ended up looking like in Chrome (and no, I don't know why the text wraps except for the last line):
-
(and no, I don't know why the early lines wrap, but the last one doesn't):
does it happen 26-28 lines down... if so, it's probably chrome's fix for what fcks firefox over in the dom/css engine
-
Nope, 32 chars down.
of course it's 32.
-
I'll have a look tomorrow...
i take back my suggestion, it would make too many things difficult to do if it works!
-
-
Whatever happens, or rather doesn't, as a result of this is your fault.
Filed under: Hope you're happy
-
[spoiler] 🎂 [/spoiler]
You lied to me preview!
Unicode to the rescue!