[quote="antiquarian, post:342, topic:49928"]
If @wood said Discourse was meant for programmers, would that excuse Discourse's UI failures?
It is for programmers. And everybody else. And Discourse has no failures, it is too big to fail.
[quote="antiquarian, post:342, topic:49928"]
If @wood said Discourse was meant for programmers, would that excuse Discourse's UI failures?
It is for programmers. And everybody else. And Discourse has no failures, it is too big to fail.
@Lorne_Kates said:
Let's check the balance scales between @apapadimoulis and @wood
[snip]
So we're tied. It's both Jeff's fault for creating Discourse, and Alex's fault for using it.
See, you obviously did the scoring wrong. I didn't win, therefore you did it wrong.
@Lorne_Kates said:
Got a flat-screen monitor forty inches wide wide Surprisingly, still a good brag. Right, @wood? Sidenote: Frank still has you beat, since he got a Chromecast.
A 40" monitor is a TV, and almost certainly has a resolution (and certainly DPI) worse than one three-quarters the size. TVs are also outside the target scope for Discourse because anyone browsing Discourse on a TV is doing it wrong. There's so much wrong with this line that this should count for a -20 score.
I have spoken, and thus it is decreed.
@Polygeekery said:if you shit all over those who try to help you, do not expect good helpFunny, that's what blakey said to @wood...
Which is why I rely on no one but myself. But even he can't be relied on sometimes.
That's probably why @wood doesn't want to support them
Exactly, why support something that will only be used less than 1/365th of the time. Android has so little marketshare it's not worth the hassle of supporting it with Discourse.
WHOA THERE.
He (@wood) said (in another topic) that a keyboard shortcut is a fully adequate replacement for an important easy-to-reach button?IS HE COMPLETELY ENTIRELY POSITIVELY NUTS?!
Was Da Vinci, Newton, Einstein or Farnsworth? All considered crazy in their time, but acknowledged as geniuses now. You plebs are just much slower in realising my genius than those on Meta.D, but you'll get there eventually.
Quick! Ask @wood to add one to Discforce!
I just might. Although, all feedback would be ignored anyway.
@aliceif said:I think that's a Chrome bug.
<hr/>Filed under: Obligatory @wood-ismHmm, well, that's interesting... Wouldn't</abbr>
have guessed. These bugs are fun!Anyway, he wouldn't think it's a Chrome bug, he'd think it's an Android 3.0 bug.
Everything is bugged. Except Discourse. Naturally.
In fact, I've even bugged your phones
Yup, it's a bug. A bug that @wood introduced intentionally and thinks of as a feature/graphical design decision, but a bug nonetheless.
Because they're the same thing. Duh.
WHOA THERE.
He (@wood) said (in another topic) that a keyboard shortcut is a fully adequate replacement for an important easy-to-reach button?IS HE COMPLETELY ENTIRELY POSITIVELY NUTS?!
Was Da Vinci, Newton, Einstein or Farnsworth? All considered crazy in their time, but acknowledged as geniuses now. You plebs are just much slower in realising my genius than those on Meta.D, but you'll get there eventually.
and the joke account that's occssionally sock puppeted by someone is @wood
I'm not a puppet. I'm a very busy person with many Discoursey things to do that doesn't leave me with much time to come here and righteously abuse you lot.
That's probably why @wood doesn't want to support them
Exactly, why support something that will only be used less than 1/365th of the time. Android has so little marketshare it's not worth the hassle of supporting it with Discourse.
thanks @wood!
You're welcome. See, Discourse is good. I knew you all would eventually thank me later.
Blocks are good. Lego are blocks. Lego is good. Therefore, blocks are good.
BLOCKS FOR EVERYONE!
@Lorne_Kates said:
Let's check the balance scales between @apapadimoulis and @wood
[snip]
So we're tied. It's both Jeff's fault for creating Discourse, and Alex's fault for using it.
See, you obviously did the scoring wrong. I didn't win, therefore you did it wrong.
@Lorne_Kates said:
Got a flat-screen monitor forty inches wide wide Surprisingly, still a good brag. Right, @wood? Sidenote: Frank still has you beat, since he got a Chromecast.
A 40" monitor is a TV, and almost certainly has a resolution (and certainly DPI) worse than one three-quarters the size. TVs are also outside the target scope for Discourse because anyone browsing Discourse on a TV is doing it wrong. There's so much wrong with this line that this should count for a -20 score.
I have spoken, and thus it is decreed.
Well, I guess I have no choice but to make Discourse more abusey then
@JazzyJosh said:Though really, this would be nice as a post tagging feature in Disco, but I doubt that ever happens because there are already categories.Tags are a barrier to something or other, according to @wood. And really, who uses tags anyway?
Filed under: Follow me on Twitter, Add me on G+
Tags are doing it wrong, especially when Discourse has such a brilliant search function.
@Maciejasjmj said:We can just pretend it's by design.That reminds me ...
Why in the world did @wood remove the share button for users that aren't logged in?
To force encourage them to create Discourse accounts