@Captain They're both Eri[c|k]s?
He did a series on monads in which he regularly refers to Haskell, but he never struck me as one of the Haskell people.
@Captain They're both Eri[c|k]s?
He did a series on monads in which he regularly refers to Haskell, but he never struck me as one of the Haskell people.
Doing nothing is better then bombing and killing for no reason, I think.
I'm sorry, all I hear is "I hate freedom and deserve to have a missile shot my ass."
You have to ask...what do we gain? Lots of confusion, lots of cost. Not really any better off in the end. Just using a different system. I will admit that it probably makes more sense than most other parts of Democrat platforms.
It would be less confusing and less costly. The problem of having to convert between two systems all the time would be gone. The problem of teaching kids imperial units and then telling them to forget it when they get to college science would be gone. The epidemic of crashing mars probes because of two systems would finally come to an end!
More seriously, we're already in the middle of a long, slow move to use metric. An abrupt shift would be a bad idea. Although I don't think that's what's being proposed. He's probably just saying government material should always state at least metric units even if they retain imperial units for now or something like that.
If nothing else, he's the only person that's ever killed Hitler.
If he were anyone else, he probably would have gotten a medal.
I like 27/12. It's not exactly 3:2, but it's close enough for most ears.
This kind of mentality is where we get that school children don't belong to their parents.
I supposed they technically don't. Everything you think you own or have custody of, the government can take away at any time. They're just nice enough to let you hold onto it for now.
How are you going to type check C++ function calls in your C program?How are you going to type check C# function calls in your C program?How are you going to type check VB function calls in your C program?How are you going to type check Java function calls in your C program?How are you going to type check Python function calls in your C program?How are you going to type check Ruby function calls in your C program?How are you going to type check JavaScript function calls in your C program?How are you going to type check Lua function calls in your C program?How are you going to type check PHP function calls in your C program?
uhhhh... you don't?
Define "interop".
If performance wasn't an issue, they'd have just made it a paramarray and the method signature would be very neat. However, they made overloads for all numbers of arguments up to 16 so the most common cases would execute faster.
How could it have retained a check-able type signature if it were a ParamArray? C# doesn't have dependent types.
@lucas1 said in Wherefore `from` in LINQ?:
@Bort That was kinda the intention. I am normally thinking a few steps ahead.
ooooohhhh... Checkmate.
Lawsuits are forming already due to this change as it's impacting a lot of people (crypt of the necrodancer is being flagged 100% as well). I'm asking to keep it as a serious discussion.
I have bad news for you.......
I wasn't trying to rebut your complaints about evangelist's attitudes, I was filing an original complaint.
It's not so much git specifically, as distributed version control in general, that people like so much.
Local commits can be really nice.
Some people use them alot and find them very helpful.
You can't do local commits with SVN.
So people who like local commits won't want to use SVN anymore and want it to go die in a fire forever so they'll never have to live without local commits.
Also the real WTF is not having an SSD
True dat.
I don't like the extra spacing in between the parens on some lines.
I also don't like the use of all-caps keywords.
I don't like the fact that you don't have a space after some of the commas (but some others you do, wtf?!).
I don't like the extra comma in CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS offsets
after y INT
.
I also don't like the formatting around the values getting inserted into offsets
.
The indentation on the CREATE VIEW...
and INSERT INTO cells..
is attrocious.
But other than that, whatever, it's alright I guess.
@dcon said in JIRA/TFS marking comments... in code.:
FYI: No jury of your peers will find you guilty!
His peers sound like a bunch of idiots.
@boomzilla said in SQL Formatting:
don't really even notice
So you start a tread to critique SQL formatting to an almost sarcastic level of detail and having meaningless prefixes on every table and view is something you just don't notice?
It's especially bad in our database because it's not even used consistently. Some tables are like "tblSomeTable", some are like "tbl_some_table" and some are like "SOME_TABLE". And they're in three different schemas that have nothing to do with which application uses them, and have a name prefix like "appname_SomeTable" or "APPNAME_SOME_TABLE" even though they also don't belong to AppName.
@antiquarian said in Oracle exec quits over co-CEO Safra Catz's promise to assist Trump:
Are you having context issues?... The people who wrote the official story, of course.
Clearly... so what's "the official story"? Is this a report put out by the Department of Commerce or something? You're starting to sound like a 9/11 truther.
continue to refer to it as logjam
http://i2.wp.com/bitcast-a-sm.bitgravity.com/slashfilm/wp/wp-content/images/logjammin.jpg
I always feel like the only guy rooting for the lions on nature shows.
I always feel like the only guy rooting for the bacteria decomposing the corpses.
the programming languages class teaches you to understand the concept of a programming language so you can pick it up in a weekend
Then one of your professors wants to do everything in Standard ML or FRIL or something you have no hope of understanding right away...
A language is more than just syntax, it's a way of representing ideas (semantics). Different languages support different ways of doing this and they take time to appreciate.
A programming language ... has very little to do with programming.
Having to learn all the little details of a language may be thought of as a necessary evil, but to say that language has very little to do with communication... that's fucking incorrect.
...an iterator doesn't allow you to modify the collection...
Mutable collections?! How repulsive!
Err, when was PHP ever functional? I'm not just being snarky.I guess PHP 5.4 or something has closures. And it has first class functions, apparently. What about purity? Referential transparency?
As much as I like Haskell and even as much as I dislike PHP:
There aren't "functional languages" so much as "languages that do a good job of supporting functional programming".
That's a misleading example, as in the context of web fora, 'everyone' is a proper subset of 'idiots'.
There are idiots that aren't part of "everyone"?
That's idiotic: if you go out of range of the fob, it should cut the engine, just like if someone tried to drive off without the fob.
There's no guarantee the car can maintain signal contact with the fob even if you're in the car. Then the engine might cut out while you're driving down the road.
A panic/kill button might work.
Or a self-destruct.
If you're any sort of decent human being, you let them move away, and respectfully stay where you are. But if you're a driver in Washington, you pull forward to close the distance and again stop uncomfortably close behind me.
And yet, in every situation I've ever been in, in a car and on foot, they always inch closer. Every time.
My strategy when on foot is usually to stand sideways and kind of sway or shift back and forth to get an extra 6 inches of personal space. If I face forward and stand still, the person behind me will get closer every time the line advances until their proximity is tantamount to rape.