Empty post glitch
-
-
-
Nice.
How did you get it?
-
-
hit reply and then quote full.
if i was on my desktop instead of this craptop i bring to robotics because it's going to get broken eventually and i'd prefer only being out $150 when that happens i would have clicked the show raw button that @onyx's tampermonkey adds to posts.
-
return -(EWORKINGASINTENDED | EWORKINGASDESIGNED);
-
hit reply and then quote full.
That doesn't work for me; I have to access the raw URL directly.
-
The 'design' of the minimum character count is to prevent low effort posts. You've demonstrated that, with effort, you can make an empty post. Congradulations.
-
I'm partial to accalia's smallspam invention myself.
-
<If, by effort, you mean adding just two characters ;)>
-
really? how odd. mobile?
-
Interesting...
@RaceProUK said:<If, by effort, you mean adding just two characters ;)>
yields
<If, by effort, you mean adding just two characters ;)>
-
-
Is it really a bug when it's deliberate and not genuine server cooties?
-
-
The 'design' of the minimum character count is to prevent low effort posts.
I think @PJH turned ours down to 1 or something.
-
@created_just_to_disl said:
<small><small><small><small><small><small><small><small><small><small><small><small><small><small><small><small><small><small><small><small><small>
I'm partial to accalia's smallspam invention myself.I don't think i was the one that came up with it.
but i do like to abuse it.
-
Not so sure about that; seems to be a Discourse issue:
-
Intended?
-
It's not cool to use firefox anymore, don't you know?
I'd do the low effort thing and switch to the cool browser, but - as I've expanded upon multiple times (sometimes even in places people would look!), it's an uncustomizable, awful-by-default, popup-ridden-by-design piece of coolkidware.
-
no, but i couldn't be arsed to figurre out which tag in my tag soup was causing that.
-
This fits with the design that "any input is valid input" to the Markdown processor: i.e. it shouldn't fail their post because the formatting was wrong.
There are still invalid inputs, though:
- Mentioning too many users
- Too many images/links as a brand new user
But those are validated after the MD processor. The MD processor has to take anything you throw at it, and spit something out. "Invalid input: Unclosed
[b]
tag" is not fun.I think @PJH turned ours down to 1 or something.
Yeah, and the default for PMs is 2, because 'ok' is a perfectly valid private message sometimes.
-
It's not cool to set fire to my vulpine friends!
-
Not so sure about that; seems to be a Discourse issue:
I'm not seeing that, but either way, I just fancied bashing Firefox.
-
I'm pretty sure
_onerror/</<()
isn't valid JS syntax...
Same post, two different CSS results...
-
Here:
Defaults:
-
-
-
the numbering scheme is
1.1.0 < 1.2.0.beta* < 1.2.0
With a branch-off for patches on stable.
-
I specifically included that to see if anyone noticed.
1.1 must be new it says there right on the Internet.
-
@Discourse website said:
Search that actually works
Search on any page: just start typing and get results instantly as you
type. The results will be automatically scoped to where you currently
are.Is that why the "Search this topic" checkbox is still off by default?
-
This fits with the design that "any input is valid input" to the Markdown processor: i.e. it shouldn't fail their post because the formatting was wrong.
But maybe it could display what it can’t parse instead of eating it?
I’d be way less bothered with Markdown if I could writea<b
and get a<b...
-
But maybe it could display what it can’t parse instead of eating it?
Well, really, what would be done is that the MD parser would convert
<
s to<
s, because the thing gobbling up the <s is the HTML sanitizer.
-
Is that why the "Search this topic" checkbox is still off by default?
It's usually on for me. It was when I just tried it. The search isn't so bad any more, though it still really needs a full page version. Still, it can find stuff.
-
And there are still stupid bugs first reported two months ago:
http://what.thedailywtf.com/t/unquotable-posts-on-firefox/5011?u=raceprouk
Of which this is another example:
http://what.thedailywtf.com/t/empty-post-glitch/7046/18?u=raceprouk
-
It's usually on for me. It was when I just tried it. The search isn't so bad any more, though it still really needs a full page version. Still, it can find stuff.
It keeps turning off for me even though I keep turning it on.
E.g. if I turn it on and then either ctrl+F5 or go to another topic, it's off by default again.
-
Ah - I get it. It's off by default if you click on the search icon in the UI, but it's on by default if you press Ctrl+F.
I generally do the former since if I press Ctrl+F that's because I want my browser's search UI come hell or high water, and will fight discourse to the death for it.Also, discosearch doesn't seem to have any useful options - not the basic options that my browser supports, and not the more advanced options it easily could.
-
I press Ctrl+F that's because I want my browser's search UI come hell or high water
Press it twice?
-
-
-
-
And less time in more?
I used to use
more
more, but now I useless
more, andmore
hardly at all.
-
I used to use more more, but now I use less more, and more hardly at all.
more
is the poor man'sless
-
actually
actually
actually
actually
actually
actually
actually
actually
actually
actually^C"
yes actually
"
-
more is the poor man's less
I'm not sure, but I don't think
less
was a thing when I started usingmore
. Eventually I became aware of its existence and started using it, instead.
-
less was a thing
I was really confused for a while when I heard about javascript implementations of
less
and how inefficient or whatever they were. I was flabbergasted. Then I learned that it was some kind of CSS bullshit instead of a useful utility and the world made sense again.
-
I was really confused for a while when I heard about javascript implementations of less and how inefficient or whatever they were. I was flabbergasted. Then I learned that it was some kind of CSS bullshit instead of
a useful utilitycommand line bullshit and the world made sense again
FTFAGM
Fixed That For All Good Men. (No, this should go into <abbr>)
Command lines are for Bad Men. This is objectively.
Subjectively, they're for horrible men but that's just my opinion.
-
No I am with boomzilla on this one. Less is awesome,unless you are talking about that freaking css tool...
-
Wondering why I've never gotten around to aliasing it to
l
like I used to havemore
aliased tom
.
-
I thought you compiled less.
Are you saying less is compiled into inefficient css?