<1000
-
Test
-
This topic was automatically closed after 60 minutes. New replies are no longer allowed.
-
I know, bad form replying after closure and whatever, but...
I think I prefer the current behavior rather than the expected. In this instance anyway. Was tempted to try it myself the other day but never got round to it...
Sod it. Reopening and moving, in case anyone's interested in commenting...
-
-
I think I prefer the current behavior rather than the expected. In this instance anyway. Was tempted to try it myself the other day but never got round to it...
Sod it. Reopening and moving, in case anyone's interested in commenting...
I might comment, if I knew what behavior you're talking about.
-
seconded!
Filed Under: PJH just likes "Test" or "1000", obviously
-
I think this was a post playing around with how Discourse turns topic titles into URLs.
-
I thought the point of having the "auto close after an hour" topic was so I could ignore it and not see shit like this. Grump.
-
That's exactly what it was, was wondering how it handled it. Wasn't quite expecting this.
-
Well, that nearly worked. I wonder...
neither did that.
Interestingly, though, entity references become the actual character if you try and re-edit the title. So editing a title like:
foo
tofoo/bar
will save as that, but if you subsequenty try to edit, will befoo/bar
-
What? TDEMSJeffIsAR
-
I keep tripping up people who try to quote my
+ (insert thingie here)
posts by putting my pluses into span tags.
Which is sort of similar.
-
Hey, @PJH
I spy an exploit just waiting to happen.
-
I keep tripping up people who try to quote my
<span>+</span> (insert thingie here)
posts by putting my pluses into span tags.
Which is sort of similar.
I wasn't trying to trip anyone up. It was just intended to be an in-line expansion of the modified acronym meme for anyone who couldn't figure out the modification on their own.
-
Unrelated, the white pages are getting far worse @PJH
-
-
This is what i'm working on now.
-
I meant that the behaviour tufty discovered just reminded me vaguely of something I often encounter.
-
-
i don't suppose we could stop changing the topic on this one could we?
it's getting rather annoying when i don't know that this is a topic i've read until after i click into it.... ON EVERY PAGE LOAD.
-
it's getting rather annoying when i don't know that this is a topic i've read until after i click into it.... ON EVERY PAGE LOAD.
Maybe you could start a poll about that?
-
Oh sure.
-
Thanks. I appreciate it.
-
Oooh, I like the look of that.
also, please change the title of this more fasterer. It's annoying @accalia
-
I specifically have the "lets give Atwood free labor" category blocked so I don't have to see this shit. Am I gonna have to block all meta now?
Get this shit off my screen.
-
-
oooh! write a doscobot to analyze each topic in discoballs and have it automatically gag the topic if it determines via a compley heuristic (actually a simple one would probably work) if @blakerat would/would not like the topic!
-
(if #t (gag))
-
it's configurable remember:
if (currentUser == 'blakeyrat') { gagTopic(); //mmph mmmmh mmmmmmmph! }
-
-
it's configurable remember:
if (currentUser == 'blakeyrat') { gagTopic(); //mmph mmmmh mmmmmmmph! } ````</blockquote> Do we need to invent a `gagBlakeyrat()` too? P.S. found another Discobug: [code] within [quote] breaks the quote, but the quad-backtick syntax for code blocks doesn't.