Front-end authentication wall
-
Filed under: You could be up all night and you'd see 8 women.
Those were the days that we don't want to relive
-
Those were the days
And we were bloody grateful to e'en ha' that. We were poor but we were 'appier. BECAUSE we were poor.
-
And we were bloody grateful to e'en ha' that. We were poor but we were 'appier. BECAUSE we were poor.
I don't remember the letter
h
not working on 56k though.
-
-
Only when you had the wrong parity setting in your COM2 config
-
-
try "clfejtnqmrnt" for 1 result from google.which insanely is from your post in this forum:
Cool, sounds like googlebot is finally catching up with the forum move.
-
Cool, sounds like googlebot is finally catching up with the forum move.
And that also sounds like Google is struggling with the SEO joy that is Discourse too. There's seriously no way it is as useful in SEO terms.
-
And that also sounds like Google is struggling with the SEO joy that is Discourse too. There's seriously no way it is as useful in SEO terms.
But, but... it has topic slugs and <aside>s and everything!
-
-
What makes you say that?
-
Call it a hunch based on the way Discourse gives its second class representation of content to Google. Google isn't stupid.
-
IIRC, Google has ways of determining if the content viewed by their bots is the same as the content seen by a typical user. If there is a difference, they score the pages lower.
-
What's second class about it? The only thing you can't do is add to the content, which google isn't going to do anyways?
Filed Under: was that a whoosh I just heard?
-
IIRC, Google has ways of determining if the content viewed by their bots is the same as the content seen by a typical user. If there is a difference, they score the pages lower.
Correct, which is how come expert sexchange got rumbled.
-
IIRC, Google has ways of determining if the content viewed by their bots is the same as the content seen by a typical user. If there is a difference, they score the pages lower.
I suspect they may do this by feeding a random selection via real people whose job is to say “similar or not”. Boring job, but really hard to defeat by comparison with a fully automated approach.
-
And that also sounds like Google is struggling with the SEO joy that is Discourse too. There's seriously no way it is as useful in SEO terms.
Yeah, I head that Google has problems indexing SPA-s. When I was looking into ember.js half a year ago, there was a strong warning that the framework is best used for internal web apps as opposed for something that will need to be publicly discoverable. Luckily, my app was internal admin panel, so I went with it.
Supposedly google was/is working on it, but it seems they still rank these lower than ordinary pages.
-
Yep, you can read about it here.
-
Yep, you can read about it here.
Ah, Google understands RFC 1149. Does it also implement RFC 2549?
-
Do you support RFC 2550?
-
Do you support RFC 2550?
Nah, not really much point.
-
And that also sounds like Google is struggling with the SEO joy that is Discourse too. There's seriously no way it is as useful in SEO terms.
That's why you have Google CACHE, the equalizer!
Filed under: Oh wait, the only hit is still what.thedailywtf.com - never mind...
Filed Filed under: I'm just confused...