In more recent news, the organic greengrocer on N. Sobertin St. is now taking Apple to court because he has prior art and trademarks over the concept of an "apple stand".
uschwarz
@uschwarz
Best posts made by uschwarz
-
RE: Apple stand
-
RE: Take one $10 USB stick (64Gb,) add Linux, sell for $80 (includes 50% discount!)
@TimeBandit said in Take one $10 USB stick (64Gb,) add Linux, sell for $80 (includes 50% discount!):
@Gurth said in Take one $10 USB stick (64Gb,) add Linux, sell for $80 (includes 50% discount!):
I chose the easier of the two.
I chose the third option: Download Red-Hat's ISO for free
Well, free minus the cost of give or take 30 hours of being online with 56k dialup and hoping there's enough error correction involved.
-
RE: Which language has the biggest…
@Bulb said in Which language has the biggest…:
https://jenkins-x.io/about/decisions/#programming-languages:
[…] Java is extremely resource intensive compared with Golang, Rust, Swift, NodeJS to name a few […]
(emphasis mine )
Now is it worse that Java is worse than the PoS that is NodeJS, or that the PoS that is NodeJS manages to be better than Java?
My under-caffeinated brain combined PoS and NodeJS to Node o'JS and then it tried to pronounce it and now no amount of coffee will bring back the innocence. But of course, pronouncing the language "jizz" may be entirely apt, since there's loads of wankers in web frontage. (And I hear they're going for backends now, too.)
-
RE: Will ASP.NET MVC ever go away?
@MrL said in Will ASP.NET MVC ever go away?:
OnPreInit, OnInitComplete, OnPreLoad, OnLoad, OnLoadComplete, OnPreRender, OnPreRenderComplete, OnUnload, plus friends. I still have nightmares.
systemd, is that you?
-
RE: Mozilla Rebranding Or: How to Waste Several Hundred Thousand Dollars on Awful Graphic Designs
Myyyyyyyyeaaaaah, "so, we did our best to hide that stupid http://www everywhere in our multistrip to the point of breaking copy-paste interaction with it, so yeah, let's have
://
in our logo."But yeah, it is the least ugly of the bunch. Though the top right one has its own colon slash aspect, I guess.
-
RE: Git
You must create a repository and make some McGyver on it.
(I found this on StackOverflow, so it must be a valid solution. Unfortunately, the question has since been deleted, but I'm convinced it sums up the git experience.)
-
RE: Windows Insert Funny Name Variation Update
@Zecc said in Windows Insert Funny Name Variation Update:
@El_Heffe said in Windows Insert Funny Name Variation Update:
What part of that do they not understand?
https://i.imgur.com/8lCGl9r.pngThe part I don't understand is why people still write mm/dd — or dd/mm for that matter — when they could write a month's name abbreviation and remove ambiguity.
(even if you're tying yourself to a given language then, that's a battle already lost since you need to pick between mm/dd and dd/mm. You need to pick a locale anyway)
My campaign to allocate 12+31 Unicode codepoints is over --> there. Just scratch some round faces showing teeth fro the next emoji update. (Anybody ever notice how emojis discriminate against people with more elongated face? Clearly, they are designed by old fat white cis-het Americans who stuff themselfs with twinks all day, or whatever those foamcakes are called. Also, seriously lacking in modifiers for more natural shades of teeth color. )
-
RE: Let's make the URL bar super-short and teach people to ignore it, what could possibly go wrong?
@anonymous234 Yeah, only the most recent Chrome doesn't show "https" anymore, it now calls the page "Secure". I'm kind of wondering if you can get an EV certificate for an entity named "Insecure Page", hijinx ensue.
Anyway, my guess is that for security purposes, upcoming versions of FF and Chrome will not display the payload part of data URIs, so you only have literally "data:text/html,…" there.
Frankly, I have no idea why they don't currently display the title of the current document anyway, as they're already hiding the protocol and (at least some) a "www." prefix if present.
Latest posts made by uschwarz
-
RE: Take one $10 USB stick (64Gb,) add Linux, sell for $80 (includes 50% discount!)
@TimeBandit said in Take one $10 USB stick (64Gb,) add Linux, sell for $80 (includes 50% discount!):
@Gurth said in Take one $10 USB stick (64Gb,) add Linux, sell for $80 (includes 50% discount!):
I chose the easier of the two.
I chose the third option: Download Red-Hat's ISO for free
Well, free minus the cost of give or take 30 hours of being online with 56k dialup and hoping there's enough error correction involved.
-
RE: Apple stand
In more recent news, the organic greengrocer on N. Sobertin St. is now taking Apple to court because he has prior art and trademarks over the concept of an "apple stand".
-
RE: From the department of forgetting to renew certificates
@levicki said in From the department of forgetting to renew certificates:
Finally there is fully automated LetsEncrypt. There is absolutely no vaild excuse for this mistake -- we don't even need to know how and why they fucked up, but the heads should roll.
Well we know they don't check their LE mechanisms – some server or other went through several renewals which simply were never deployed to production last autumn (IIRC). End result: you simply didn't get addon updates, and the only way to find out was a singular line in the error console.
-
RE: Will ASP.NET MVC ever go away?
@MrL said in Will ASP.NET MVC ever go away?:
OnPreInit, OnInitComplete, OnPreLoad, OnLoad, OnLoadComplete, OnPreRender, OnPreRenderComplete, OnUnload, plus friends. I still have nightmares.
systemd, is that you?
-
RE: Which language has the biggest…
@Bulb said in Which language has the biggest…:
https://jenkins-x.io/about/decisions/#programming-languages:
[…] Java is extremely resource intensive compared with Golang, Rust, Swift, NodeJS to name a few […]
(emphasis mine )
Now is it worse that Java is worse than the PoS that is NodeJS, or that the PoS that is NodeJS manages to be better than Java?
My under-caffeinated brain combined PoS and NodeJS to Node o'JS and then it tried to pronounce it and now no amount of coffee will bring back the innocence. But of course, pronouncing the language "jizz" may be entirely apt, since there's loads of wankers in web frontage. (And I hear they're going for backends now, too.)
-
RE: Windows Insert Funny Name Variation Update
@Zecc said in Windows Insert Funny Name Variation Update:
@El_Heffe said in Windows Insert Funny Name Variation Update:
What part of that do they not understand?
https://i.imgur.com/8lCGl9r.pngThe part I don't understand is why people still write mm/dd — or dd/mm for that matter — when they could write a month's name abbreviation and remove ambiguity.
(even if you're tying yourself to a given language then, that's a battle already lost since you need to pick between mm/dd and dd/mm. You need to pick a locale anyway)
My campaign to allocate 12+31 Unicode codepoints is over --> there. Just scratch some round faces showing teeth fro the next emoji update. (Anybody ever notice how emojis discriminate against people with more elongated face? Clearly, they are designed by old fat white cis-het Americans who stuff themselfs with twinks all day, or whatever those foamcakes are called. Also, seriously lacking in modifiers for more natural shades of teeth color. )
-
RE: Git
You must create a repository and make some McGyver on it.
(I found this on StackOverflow, so it must be a valid solution. Unfortunately, the question has since been deleted, but I'm convinced it sums up the git experience.)
-
RE: A Very Specific Number Ate My Homework
@dkf said in A Very Specific Number Ate My Homework:
You might have a problem if you put more than 64 bits worth of values in your table, but that's a Shit-Ton of Data anyway.
Guess who else thought "well, that's bigger than I'll ever realistically need".
-
RE: Let's make the URL bar super-short and teach people to ignore it, what could possibly go wrong?
@anonymous234 Yeah, only the most recent Chrome doesn't show "https" anymore, it now calls the page "Secure". I'm kind of wondering if you can get an EV certificate for an entity named "Insecure Page", hijinx ensue.
Anyway, my guess is that for security purposes, upcoming versions of FF and Chrome will not display the payload part of data URIs, so you only have literally "data:text/html,…" there.
Frankly, I have no idea why they don't currently display the title of the current document anyway, as they're already hiding the protocol and (at least some) a "www." prefix if present.