duh, didn't you know? you're supposed to view source on that last page.
you'll see there's either a meta or js refresh that doesn't end up firing. just copy the destination url out of there and navigate to it. it'll be a "success/thank you page"
works like a charm, done it twice in the past.
i'm surprised that issue is still there since i last used it, weak sauce.
tariq
@tariq
Best posts made by tariq
Latest posts made by tariq
-
RE: All I wanted to do was book a Road Test
-
RE: NetBEUI tunneling; TRWTF is that it worked.
err my bad, indexed by google was a bad choice of words. meant ranked/indexed high enough to be visible when searching for the company name. not showing up yet.
-
RE: NetBEUI tunneling; TRWTF is that it worked.
i think OP ought to reconsider anonymizing the entire article (names, products, locations, etc). not for the now defunct company's sake, but for yourself. you'll regret it when your post comes back to bite you in the ass.
ie. web search for company name now brings up this post on page 2 using duckduckgo.com. only a matter of time before its indexed by google).
-
RE: Important! increase this value by 1 everytime a keyword is excluded below
@DaveK said:
However isn't TRWTF that this array is not automatically generated and inserted into the page but manually updated from time to time anyway, and they could have just not included all those "isp filtering" strings in the first place?
-
RE: The mystery links
@Bellinghman said:
Call me weird, but the moment I saw those letters, I thought of the months.
ditto. noticed that right away. happens anytime i see j a s o n
-
RE: Who needs HTML anyway?
@Zylon said:
@tariq said:
You do realize that JPEGs and GIFs can (and should) be used interchangeably, don't you?
No, they shouldn't. First, nobody should be using GIF anymore (except for animations where absolutely necessary), since PNG is supported by all major browsers and offers much better compression. Second, PNG and JPEG are uniquely suited to particular types of images. Using them interchangeably is the height of web graphical cluelessness.
- We weren't discussing PNGs, but you're right.
- Read Mole's post and my reply again. You quoted me out of context.
-
RE: Who needs HTML anyway?
TRWTF is that there is a web graphics standardization push.
You do realize that JPEGs and GIFs can (and should) be used interchangeably, don't you? They differ in their compression ability. As a rough guide, JPEG is better for fine detail while GIF for solids and repetition. If you pop those FS images into a decent image editor and try to save as a JPEG and GIF, you'll see that they chose the format that yielded the smallest file size.
-
RE: Apple WTF
Apple does have registered copyrights for OS X dating back several years.