here is where the site originates from. i like how it defaults to network-abuse.
here is where the site originates from. i like how it defaults to network-abuse.
@Daniel15 said:
Wow... Looks like the original issue is fixed, but the HTML is still ugly. Just look at this:
<font
color="black" face="VERDANA,ARIAL" size="1">© <i>2007<small><small><small><small>, </small></small></small></small></i></font><small><small><font
style="font-family: Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-transform: none;"
color="black" face="" size="2"><small><small><strong>Deborah Jeane Palfrey</strong></small></small></font></small></small><font
color="black" face="VERDANA,ARIAL" size="1"><i>. All rights reserved.</i></font>
@bairy said:It does, I wonder if somewhere, some coder is looking for a new job. There are still quite a few br tags at the bottom of the source.
Not just that, they've even got strange indentation :PPity it hasn't got a 'designed by' on it
I noticed this:
<!-- Copyright (C) 1998-2006 Netsential.com Inc. All Rights Reserved. info at netsential dot com -->
I think that company may be responsible - Their website has a similar HTML style (ie. UGLY) :P
They must be using Netscape Navigator's HTML Editor, it does this sort of crap. I wonder what they charged her for the site?
@sycro said:
@savar said:@tster said:
congrats. you found a bug. Just fix it. That's what your paid to do.It's not really a bug. A bug implies something that at first looks correct but turns out to be subtly wrong.
This is just plain wrong. If I told you I was born in 1982, could you tell me how old I am today? No, and neither can a computer.
bug: Informal. a defect or imperfection, as in a mechanical device, computer program, or plan; glitch: The test flight discovered the bugs in the new plane.
So, yes, it is a bug. Change DateInterval.Year to DateInterval.Day and it's fixed. I think the fact that it involves changing one word more than shows that it is in fact a bug, even by your definition. At most, it is 1 year greater.
Edit: So this was wrong. I just read the MSDN link, and the first doesn't give a level of precision, it gives what you want a count of.
Outuput from sample: -47
Module Module1
Sub Main()
Console.WriteLine(CInt(DateDiff(DateInterval.Year, DateTime.Now, DateTime.Parse("06/15/1960"), , )))
Console.ReadLine()
End Sub
End Module
@mrsticks1982 said:
@KattMan said:Go to Computer World's Sharktank at http://sharkbait.computerworld.com/
Go to any entry and attempt to add a comment as an unregistered user.
Take a look at your captcha text.
I predict you will have the following:
NECXA
It doesn't validate but I always get that as the first captcha text. The second one is always different, but of course it also doesn't validate.
I've tried this on both IE and FireFox.
I am guessing that the site puts a cookie on your computer with the captcha id.http://sharkbait.computerworld.com/?q=_textimage/image/117491988
http://sharkbait.computerworld.com/?q=_textimage/image/1Change the last digit to something else and a new image will appear.
It generates a new catcha sequentially for each post try.
@KattMan said:
Go to Computer World's Sharktank at http://sharkbait.computerworld.com/
Go to any entry and attempt to add a comment as an unregistered user.
Take a look at your captcha text.
I predict you will have the following:
NECXA
It doesn't validate but I always get that as the first captcha text. The second one is always different, but of course it also doesn't validate.
I've tried this on both IE and FireFox.
I am guessing that the site puts a cookie on your computer with the captcha id.
http://sharkbait.computerworld.com/?q=_textimage/image/117491988
http://sharkbait.computerworld.com/?q=_textimage/image/1
Change the last digit to something else and a new image will appear.
@malfist said:
I really want to move hosts, but I don't own it. It was hacked once sense I've started working on it and everything deleted almost (not just my site, all of them), according to their news it's not the first time either. They had a DoS just before I started working on it. ugh, I hate it.
What is message board software are you using? I currently host my wifes website through 1and1.com, never had a problem with them and they are dirt cheap and usually give you a couple free domains.
@sycro said:
@mrsticks1982 said:@sycro said:
I'm just curious how this news means "We all work for Yahoo!"
sorry, I work in the web development realm and forget that there are other programming worlds! I was just blown away at how stupid the US Patent office can be.
That wasn't quite my point. Just because they have this technique patented does not mean you are working for them. They can force you to stop doing it, but they can't take your work.
It got you to read it, right? Otherwise you would've just past right over this thread.
It now gives Yahoo the power to sue every other company that produces for the web because they are infringing on a patent. Honestly, I don't think yahoo will do anything with this new power except brag about how they created they created the "web".
@sycro said:
I'm just curious how this news means "We all work for Yahoo!"
sorry, I work in the web development realm and forget that there are other programming worlds! I was just blown away at how stupid the US Patent office can be.
http://www.patentmonkey.com/PM/PatentID/7171414.aspx
found on http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/15/patent-monkey-yahoo-ready-to-smash-up-the-mash-ups/
Welcome to the American patent system.