small {
font-weight: bold; color: red; font-size: 20px; line-height: 40px;
}
p > small:after, p a > small:after { content: '< This person is a dick.'; color: #000; font-size: 12px;
}
small {
font-weight: bold; color: red; font-size: 20px; line-height: 40px;
}
p > small:after, p a > small:after { content: '< This person is a dick.'; color: #000; font-size: 12px;
}
example.com is reserved by IANA as a domain that can be used for testing without prior consent. It will also never be available for registration.
Fun story: a few years ago I was doing an integration with a major payment gateway. Their testing environment was full of wtfs, including the fact that every developer in the world shared the same test account (there were notices everywhere saying don't change this or that because it affects everyone). All of the payment gateway response emails were set to go to {domain-that-has-not-been-registered}.com. So I bought that domain, set up the email account on it, and you wouldn't believe what kind of info I had access to.
It's a good thing I am not evil....
When was the last time you thought to yourself, "Hmmm. I'm kind of bored right now. I have no idea what to do. I know! I'll go to YouTube and just randomly search for stuff in a desperate attempt to fill this empty hole that some people call a soul! Yes! That's exactly what I need to do!"?No one does that either. Ever.
You really don't think millions of people dick around on YouTube every day for entertainment?
Is this why none of my code comments show up on the twitters?
Found while googling the first sentence of wikipedia's fundraising plea....
Then there's the open-source project I worked on where the UI guy held fast that everything should be done using divs. Even tabular data: Divs put in table-mode somehow.
I've met some of those anti-table people. Life is a lot easier when you use things for what they are designed for.
Also the "I don't like Windows Phone so people who use it should suffer" attitude.
"Devicive" behavior.
accalia:Image Fail:
here's what you wanted.It's a Fox alright, but not cute.
fixed?
And that says exactly what in relation to my point? Nothing.I'm not arguing that people don't search for things on YouTube. I'm talking about discoverability and the entry points to the site to begin with. It's in the only part of my relevant post that you bothered to quote, for god's sake.
It says quite a bit, unless you are proposing that every single one of the billions of searches every month is performed after a site visitor follows a video link (well, minus me @Polygeekery and @ben_lubar)
But yeah, it's totally possible that one of the most popular sites in the world gets no direct traffic searches.
Jesus Christ, I feel like I'm trying to argue that gravity does in fact exist.
That's a nice subliminal way to train people to hate IE (if they don't already).
One time a guy got mad when I corrected his spelling, and threatened to punch me in my noose.
Then there's the open-source project I worked on where the UI guy held fast that everything should be done using divs. Even tabular data: Divs put in table-mode somehow.
I've met some of those anti-table people. Life is a lot easier when you use things for what they are designed for.
Somewhere around 2000 - I remember using IE5 :gross:
That reminds me a lot of the first website I ever built - think I had nested tables up to 6 levels deep.
Yeah, I knew you were being pedantic so I threw some sarcasm in :) But seriously, I thought web accessibility would be ux/ui 101.
It's split into three images. And there a couple of lines of text at the top and bottom.
In that case, I retract my objection.
From: http://www.peiwuyang.com/shoulder-pole-design-research
If you are promoting yourself as a UI/UX design specialist, maybe don't make your page content a single image?