@WPT said in Shaming my home country:
@LoneRifle
My issue with this spectacle is that any of the IT contractors should have at least some sort of common sense to point out the wrong terms used and the in-feasibility of attempting to build your own OS that is compatible to the wide range of devices that they were claiming to support in just 5 years, given that every year, you would also need to cater for new drivers for new devices that is going to come out into the market, and also to support compatibility for older devices, etc..
Sure, hence the "taken in purely aspirational terms" get-out clause that the IDA pointed out.