@joe.edwards said:
@Adanine said:FTFYThe rite of piracyI never knew about that one.
@joe.edwards said:
@Adanine said:FTFYThe rite of piracyI never knew about that one.
@morbiuswilters said:
I'd protest, but you have a biological imperative to hunt giraffes, and I don't want to be a bigot.
FTFY
@esoterik said:
straight C malloc/delete is a paradigm that just refuses to die
That's unfortunate, since straight C malloc/free is a paradigm that isn't all that difficult, and is actually correct.
@spamcourt said:
@bridget99 said:reason-biased
I had never heard that term before, what does it mean?
It's defined right there.
@bridget99 said:
I'm not sure what the intent could be that would make any difference. It is a bit unfair when people get turned into an example... but it's their own damned fault.
So you agree that she should have been fired?
@joe.edwards said:
I want a Visual Studio add-in or extension that adds an arsenal of weapons you can use to shoot, burn, bomb, and nuke bad code. Each weapon would destroy a different amount of code (gun shoots an identifier, flamethrower burns a line, bomb blows up a method, nuke annihilates a class, etc). Of course it should have vivid animations.
@KrakenLover said:
How so many businesses, so many business people, accountants, sales people, executives, can still not get this simple concept and be so resistant to the idea
There's no reason for any of those people to understand the technical details, nor why they matter. From their perspective, any explanation of why a WTF of this caliber is a Really Bad Thing is only going to sound like you're trying to fleece them, and hey, they're just not gullible enough to fall for that one. Perhaps TRWTF is their legal department.
@Ben L. said:
Yes, because chrome doesn't use Adobe Flash, it uses Google Chrome-brand Adobe Flash-like Substance.
Interestingly, my Chrome just updated (I should say, I updated it, because it starts to become unresponsive whenever there is an update pending) and managed to break Flash.
I can't shake the unsettling feeling that "[code]salary ASC[/code]" is the result of wishing to convey "increase your salary by taking a job with us!" and losing something in the translation.
@boe2 said:
not sure if I am missing some weird form of satire here
It's Lorne Kates. Of course it's satire.