InspirotBot is an AI driven program to create “Inspirational Posters”.
Who Are These People?
@El_Heffe
Best posts made by El_Heffe
-
Prepare to be Inspired! (What could possibly go wrong?)
-
The unofficial offical bad pun of the day thread
Pakistani Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif is involved in a corruption scandal and his daughter allegedly signed forged documents to try to cover up the truth. A document purporting to have been written and signed in 2006 used Microsoft's Calibri font, which didn't ship in a stable version of Windows or Office until 2007. As such, its use in a document dated 2006 is extremely suspect.
Ultimately, the fallout of this is that Pakistan may soon be sans-Sharif.
-
RE: The Official Funny Stuff Thread™
https://i.imgur.com/aJoqXIC.jpg
I think that's called "arson".
-
RE: Fucking Recruiter dumbshittery
One day, I was goofing off and posted a resume to a well known Job Search Website. Except, it wasn't a resume. It was a page of random gibberish that I created with a random text generator I found.
A year later, the throw-away email account i used is still getting emails that say "We read your resume and think you would be a good fit for our company"
-
Google wants to make e-mail more "interactive" - what could possibley go wrong?
“With AMP for Email, it’s easy for information in email messages to be dynamic, up-to-date and actionable.”
No. Just fucking no.
Latest posts made by El_Heffe
-
RE: The Official Funny Stuff Thread™
Last night I did a hit of LCD and it was crazy. The stars, the colors .... and then I passed out.
"Don't you mean LSD?"
No, a flat screen TV fell on my head.
-
RE: In Log4J WTF news today…
@Carnage said in In Log4J WTF news today…:
I'd love if Java wasn't as retarded about logging as it is.
I'd love if Java wasn't as retarded about anything as it is
-
RE: The Official Funny Stuff Thread™
There was an episode of Seinfeld similar to this. Once again, life imitates art.
-
RE: WTF Bites
The metric makes sense when you are considering single threads.
Nope. Still not 300 percent of anything.
Let's say your program is running on 4 cores simultaneously. In total, how much CPU time did your program get in 1 second? The answer is 4 seconds - or 400%.
Nope. Doesn't work that way. It doesn't matter if you have 1 core or 1 Million. If one second has passed then you have used one second of CPU time.
You might want to brag that your CPU used "1 Million Percent CPU Time" by multiplying cores x time, because it sounds more impressive in your advertising or CPU/Penis Measuring Contest, but it is meaningless and irrelevant bullshit.
One second elapsed is one second.
-
RE: WTF Bites
The metric makes sense when you are considering single threads.
Nope. Still not 300 percent of anything.
-
RE: WTF Bites
Somebody needed a click-bait story.
It seems that the Android Runtime for Chrome Virtual Machine (ARCVM) can hog the Chromebook's CPU . . . . eating up to 300 percent (three cores times 100 percent) of the processor's resources "for several minutes."
No, that's not how numbers and percentages work. 100% of 3 cores is . . . . 100% of 3 cores. It isn't 300 percent of anything.
If a device has 4 cores, then using 100% of 3 cores means you are using 75% of available cores. Still not 300 percent of anything.
-
RE: WTF is happening with Windows 11? And nothing else
@topspin said in WTF is happening with Windows 11? And nothing else:
Microsoft Edge runs on the same technology as Chrome, with the added trust of Microsoft.
That's not even the best part. First MS says “Chrome? That browser is so 2008!" which is followed by “Microsoft Edge runs on the same technology as Chrome".
So, instead of 2008 Chrome, I should use Edge, which according to Microsoft, uses the same 2008 technology.
I think that gets the unintended ironying award for the day.