@tdittmar said:
Jesus, you don't even know that the word Shaman doesn't have any connection to the word Man?? How can anybody not know how to spell his own job title? It would be like me saying I'm a software developerist...
I'm not sure the etymology of "shaman" is covered in Spectate's Grade 9 education. He is really above that kind of intellectual geekery.
He cannot even spell his own name - his SourceForge project is called SpecatateSwamp.... Also, he probably thinks "shamen" is a "clever" "pun" (like most of his renamed thread titles).
@tdittmar said:
@SpectateSwamp said:
I used ulead to look at the details.
This is a direct contradiction to your "no editing" policy. That makes you - you guessed it - a LIAR!!
Sadly, he has already covered this in another thread, on another forum:
http://www.daniweb.com/forums/showthread.php?t=74992&highlight=spectateswamp+edit
I'll give you the Cliff/Coles notes:
SpectateSwamp: #1 reason for editing video is to cut out crime. Don't incriminate yourselves.
Forum Member #1: Sorry, what's your point? (This isn't even a video forum.)
SpectateSwamp: BLA BLA BLA nature BLA BLA BLA video BLA BLA BLA Rodney King BLA BLA BLA political forums
SpectateSwamp: Another good use for editors is to view video artifacts. It helps if you have a bird in the picture. Birds can see video artifacts.
Forum Member #2: This is highly amusing, considering you just posted a thread about how it's completely unnecessary to edit video.
SpectateSwamp (direct quote):
"It's not really editing. Just using an editor. My custom player does
a reasonable job of slowing down the action. But I must agree that
editors do have a purpose in "better viewing of digital artifacts"
So technically I'm still not editing. Just viewing the detail with one.
I have yapped so much about not editing. That it came back to bite
me. That kind of stuff happens to people all the time."
Forum Member #2 (direct quote): "
Just using an editor.... to edit?
You're not making any sense."
Notice how Spectate starts off talking about editing to remove incriminating evidence, then as soon as someone calls him on his shit, he start talking about editing to view video artifacts.
Kinda like he used "Stones" to refer to medicine stones and the Rolling Stones in the same post. (Another "clever" "pun".)
As soon as anyone advances a cogent point of criticism or a valid line of inquiry, Spectate will simply redefine the whole discussion. If you could prove to Spectate that SSDS doesn't do search, he would simply claim it was a video player all along.