@amischiefr said:
I like how he's using generics to create the list of type Object.
Assuming this is Java, the compiler would complain without it.
@amischiefr said:
I like how he's using generics to create the list of type Object.
Assuming this is Java, the compiler would complain without it.
Complications of Netbase:
Hosted erotic art
Sponsoring child pornography
@Helix said:
@jimlangrunner said:....... Alex will get to look at it, won't he? Wrong. Gotta go, gotta go, gotta go go go! Put it in right now. ......I work at Burger King making flame broiled whoppers, I wear paper hats. Would you like an apple pie with that? Would you like an apple pie with that? Ding! Fries are done. Ding! Fries are done. Ding! Fries are done. Ding! Fries are done. I gotta run. I gotta run. I gotta run. I gotta run.
The end of the excerpt from jimlangrunner is more suggestive of Quizno's than Burger King.
@DOA said:
all I need now is a bot net
I'm not familiar with with Silverlight, but couldn't you just have your submission do the voting/cheating on its own? To me, that'd be a lot easier than tricking people into joining a botnet, AND it would work on all platforms that support Silverlight.
@merreborn said:
I'm not sure if that's better or worse than allowing the overdraft, and sticking her with the exorbitant fees.
It's a lot worse, because, if her husband had noticed what happened, he would have made out a check for $10,000 and made off with everything.
He would have then proceeded to attempt to get to the nearest airport, but get lost on the way and end up in the middle of nowhere several states over (this -- minus the fraud -- has actually happened before).
@vt_mruhlin said:
Wachovia will give you at least $5 for free.
Worse yet, get this: My sister and her soon-to-be-ex-husband have a shared account with Wachovia through into which he is supposed to deposit child-support payments until the courts come up with a better way of doing things. For some reason, he decided to pay his utility bills through this account, overdrawing it by about $250. The bank took notice that the man's wife happens to also have an account there (but without his name on it) and decides to extend overdraft-protection and happily took $250 out of her account.
This code sort-of reminds me of a "Computer Science" (read: basic Java skills) competition in my area. The code samples they provide also use terrible names (like c, it, that, james, and big; and that's not even to obfuscate the code), include useless statements, and don't even follow Java coding conventions. Here's an example:
What does this code output?
int c=0; for (c=24; c>10; c=c-3) { c=c-3; } out.println(c);(a) 42
(b) 9
(c) 6
(d) c
(e) There is no output due to a runtime error.
To me, it appears that this solution (which I do agree is bad) would have worked had the case been oriented vertically.. not that that makes it an acceptable solution for a customer. Of course, TRWTF are cases that require proprietary power supplies.
I find it a bit scary that they want to remove /dev/willy and all its contents. Wouldn't it be a lot less painful to
dd if=/dev/willy of=/dev/null
than to rm it?
@mariushm said:
The uninstall process just removes the shortcuts and a few registry entries.
It does not remove IE.
The same thing goes for the Media Player, it's not removed, only the shortcuts are hidden.
You are forgetting how many programs depend on the IE and media-player libraries. A ton of non-MS stuff would stop working if you removed ALL of IE and WMP.