According to FON:
( http://maps.fon.com/?lang=en )
Nebraska == Niger
South Dakota == Sudan
Cayman Islands are in Kentucky
Arizona == Azerbaijan
According to FON:
( http://maps.fon.com/?lang=en )
Nebraska == Niger
South Dakota == Sudan
Cayman Islands are in Kentucky
Arizona == Azerbaijan
I think it's stupid, too. I was just relaying extra stupidity.
I think MS wants people to use Indeterminate as null.
In the DataGridViewCheckBoxColumn, you can set the TrueValue, FalseValue, and IndeterminateValue.
Imagine a lame db table field where you have 1, 0, or null/empty. Thanks to the binding DataGridView.DataSource allows, you can pull in 1/0/null and have them map to check/unchecked. Whenever the user changes the button's state, the control maps the data back to the bound source so the db can be updated.
This may be poorly explained, but MS wanted .NET 2.0 to be really enterprisey.
"String.Split uses a delimiter to create an array of strings from a source string. In doing so, String.Split allocates a new string object for each string that it has split out, plus one object for the array. As a result, using String.Split in a heavy duty context (such as a sorting routine) can be expensive. "
Anybody want to count the number of string allocations in these two lines?
My coworker found this in a chunk of old code he's detarding/refactoring:
<font color="teal" face="Courier New" size="2">String</font><font face="Courier New" size="2">[] textParagraphArray = _mainBodyText.Split(<font color="maroon">"\n"</font>.ToCharArray());</font><font face="Courier New" size="2"><o:p></o:p>
textArray = </font><font face="Courier New" size="2">textParagraphArray</font><font face="Courier New" size="2">[i].Split(<font color="maroon">" "</font>.ToCharArray());</font><font face="Arial" size="2"><o:p></o:p></font>
(only variable names changed to protect the stupid)
[quote user="HeroreV"]Why would anybody choose to donate their time to a project headed by such a retard? I would never have the desire to contribute under such circumstances.
[/quote]
I have a coworker whom the legendary RMS asked to write a tutorial for EMACS like he (my coworker) did for Scheme. Here are his comments on working "with" RMS:
it's pretty insane working with him actually...
...he doesn't believe in having a pc connected to the internet...
...he has a homebrewed email system where all batch downloaded to a laptop and then he answers your email and batch uploads them at a later date...
...so every email he responds to is 3 emails earlier than the one you sent him...
...he also batch downloads any web pages...
...since my entire draft tutorial is a linear progression of pages,
this meant he could only download one page at a time and then comments
on it and then writes "i'll download the next page now"- then three
days later he sees the next page
...this was frustrating because he kept complaining that things
weren't explained well enough because he couldn't see that they were
explained on the next page
so eventually I put all the pages together into a mondo page and now the process is working a lot better
...first thing he made me do is remove all tips for Windows users from the entire tutorial
i'm also not allowed to mention anything in the reference section that isn't free- So I couldn't mention any books
...the comical thing is that the 2 books I mentioned are both
available free online as a download, but not licensed under the GPL...
I don't know whether I should mention this, or if something is
automatically not free if it isn't licensed in the GPL, even if it is a
free download
It's not a replacement, it's an enterprisey enhancement.