I am never cleaning my teeth at Dentist. The dentist (or his assistant) usually does that.
Reminds me of the bathroom signs that employees must wash hands before leaving.
I hate waiting around, so I just wash my own hands
I am never cleaning my teeth at Dentist. The dentist (or his assistant) usually does that.
Reminds me of the bathroom signs that employees must wash hands before leaving.
I hate waiting around, so I just wash my own hands
Whatever it is, it's probably still too heavy for a woman to lift, but she would still demand equal pay.
Filed Under: [I kid I kid.] ()
Especially not if all libertarians share your "less people in the market => more market share for me" attitude.
It amazes me that the same people that think people left to their own morality will automatically screw over the less fortunate in the name of gaining more stuff are the same ones who think that people under control of the government will work for little to no reward in the name of community and the global village
Oh my god! You killed kerning! You bastard!
I like how I heard it described once - left wingers have no faith in the people and put it instead in the government, assuming the people can't live without help from the government, and right wingers put their faith in the people, believing the government should be an entity that is an extension of the people, not in control of them.
First request I have seen for this, across a year and a half of working on Discourse, and dozens of different communities. shrug
You'll never shoehorn this community in with others. Plus, as mostly developers, there's certain things we may notice mention because we know to look for it, and we know it is possible to fix/modify. It amazes me what some users will assume can't be fixed almost as much as what they think can be added
Should call it a ScarecrowException. And if it detects you're a politician, it could throw a TinmanException
Instead of pressing a button.
I think with Google glass you just wink at it to take a picture. Which is kind of creepy in its own right...
I really, really like Bodhi Linux fir a nice lightweight distro, although enlightenment still needs a bit of maturing before it can stand on its own amongst the masses.
I've currently run mint though - cinnamon on my laptop and kde on the desktop.
@Intercourse said:
If you have faith, it implies apprehension and the possibility of doubt.
When it comes to religion, you have this wrong. Those with real faith in $DEITY have NO apprehension doubt despite the lack of evidence. Note I did not say "despite evidence to the contrary"
@Intercourse said:
Those who have religion and faith do so in spite of the preponderance of evidence that their viewpoint is demonstrably false.
Evidence against the existence of $DEITY? If you have that, you're the first. Or more likely, you're being horribly close minded, and assuming that those who believe are stupid makes you sound bigoted. And you're trying to force your thoughts on the matter on them, something that I find many who share your views claim as a reason they hate religion.
Wasn't that his original claim to fame? Or was that just Spolsky?
Okay, that makes sense, and I can concede on that. Dumb arguments make both sides look bad all too often.
Like Harry Reid complaining that this decision came from five white guys... (I still swear the left brings race into it more than the right). I guess Clarence Thomas isn't black enough, like Herman Cain.
I don't recall anyone telling anyone else what they should believe. From me it has mostly been an argument about word definitions and the incorrect use of words as propaganda
Without the belief in a higher power, it may be difficult understand, but it doesn't matter if it technically isn't a fertilized egg yet or not. Morality under God is not about what you do, it's about why you do it. The intent of the questionable items is to affect what happens after the potential for pregnancy. So arguing what the words mean and the science behind it is telling them what to believe by telling them their beliefs are wrong.
Awfully ironic that atheism and agnosticism were part of my wife's "Religions of the World" class...
I feel like everybody is arguing over the wrong thing really... this isn't about what people should believe. And some of you are taking your bigotry against Christianity and theism awfully far in your demands that they must agree with you because scientific theory.
This is not about a belief being correct or not (and for the most part, this couldn't proven anyways). This is about whether the government can force you do something against your beliefs just because you employ people. And no, Hobby Lobby is not ditching their beliefs on their employees, just simply refusing to pay for something that the employees can still pay for on their own (and since they pay significantly more than other retailers, the employees can surely do so on their own)