@cconroy said:
No need to rewind. Just search for the frame you want and JAM IT.
SpectateSwampDesktopSearch can do this for you. Or you could use a camcorder, video your screen going forward, then rewind the camcorder tape.
@cconroy said:
No need to rewind. Just search for the frame you want and JAM IT.
SpectateSwampDesktopSearch can do this for you. Or you could use a camcorder, video your screen going forward, then rewind the camcorder tape.
[quote user="Renan "C#" Sousa"]
<snip screenshot>
6.20 Gb at 3.99Mb/sec shouldn't take that long. I went to the kitchen for some food and came back some 15 minutes later and it was still like this.
[/quote]
Out of curiosity, is this SP1? Or original flavour Vista?
I heard various perceptual file copy issues were meant to be fixed in SP1
@t94xr said:
When I was employed for my latest job, the boss rang me up, "Hi, David Raven here, listen you don't know me?"
I was on my bed thinking, should I?
Thanks for sharing.
I've been following this thread forever and I can't believe you guys don't take SpectateSwamp seriously. Have you even downloaded his Search app and tried it? It rocks!
Swampie, I want to be on the team. First thing I want to do is translate your app to another Language like C, because Hackers like that and you might get more people involved that way.
@Erick said:
That's what's wrong with the code! The while is outside the for loop, and there's nothing inside the while!for (int i=0; i<nMaxValue; i++)
{
do_stuff();
while (false)
{
break;
}
}
See? That works much better!
Genius! Thanks for this I'll let my co-worker know.
You know that common C dilemma people have? How to prevent a "for" loop from rebelliously over-running the boundaries you set it? Well I picked up this cunning solution from my co-workers code:
for (int i=0; i<nMaxValue; i++)
{
do_stuff();
}
while(false);
That last statement makes all the difference, really.