@TODO
-
I'm trying to communicate with a third-party web API. Using their samples, the API calls only give me this:
<!DOCTYPE HTML
>
<html>
<head>
<title>Error Loading Application</title>
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type" />
</head>
<body>
<!-- @todo replace this with a real error page with a reasonable and/or helpful message -->
</body>
</html>
-
That's a more helpful error message than I'm used to dealing with.
-
My guess is the clue is in the title: the application hasn't loaded. Perhaps they start an application per user or per port or whatever, and the samples of course refer to a non-existing resource. But, a better error message would inspire more confidence.
-
@mott555 said:
I'm trying to communicate with a third-party web API. Using their samples, the API calls only give me this:
Having to currently deal with a 3rd-party API, I can say this: fire them. Immediately.
-
@Sutherlands said:
@mott555 said:
I'm trying to communicate with a third-party web API. Using their samples, the API calls only give me this:
Having to currently deal with a 3rd-party API, I can say this: fire them. Immediately.Unfortunately, this is a 3rd-party API that a paying client has required us to work with. 3rd party apparently has a monopoly on a certain type of data that paying client wants access to through our application.
-
I like that they allow the possibility of adding a reasonable message that isn't helpful at all. (Our intern Ted who manages this is on vacation this week.) Or! A helpful message that isn't reasonable. (Unplug your computer and go to Cancun to unwind!)