Spammer WTFs



  • We all hate spam, but sometimes it can be rather amusing to see how spammer waste their own resources and time.

    Frank Preston should really have tried to register "[?var=oemurl]" first, before sending out this junk... :p

    =======================================================

    From: "Frank Preston" <successionsg95@garireo.com>
    Subject: [?var=cssubj]
    X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180
    X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180

    Adobe Creative Suite 3 Master Collection for Win

    Blur boundaries and break rules in pursuit of your vision - Master Collection equips you to take your designs anywhere you want to go.

    http://[?var=oemurl]/2608.php

    Additional features and services:
    Adobe Bridge CS3
    Adobe Version Cue CS3
    Adobe Device Central CS3
    Adobe Stock Photos
    ========================================================
     
    Anyone else have any amusing examples? 



  • Re: www.FAKEPAYCHECKSTUBS.com How to defraud scam the irs government income tax fraud

    The irony of this thread does have a kind of beauty to it...



  • @jakester said:

    Print out Fake Employment and Fake Income, Wages, 1099, w2, w-2, using your home computer printer!
    I printed a fake W-2 to take with me to the bar to convince women that I'm a millionaire.  Sadly, I mixed it up with my real W-2 while doing my taxes.   Now I've been shot down by a bunch of bar floozies and I owe $300,000 in income tax.  Thanks a lot.



  • Not actually a spammer, but rather a recruitment site (read: they are kind of allowed to send me mails)...

    > http://img22.imageshack.us/img22/4751/vacaturerd9.jpg

     And not to forget: their slogan is: "The site with/for talent".

     

     



  • @agtrier said:

     And not to forget: their slogan is: "The site with/for talent".
     

    Last time I checked "m/v" still meant "man/vrouw" ("man/woman"), not "met/voor" ("with/for").



  • @dtech said:

    Last time I checked "m/v" still meant "man/vrouw" ("man/woman"), not "met/voor" ("with/for").
     

    Caught me. Now you know how bad my Dutch is ;-)



  • oh so now hermafrodites are somehow LESS capable? If anything they present more possibilities.


Log in to reply
 

Looks like your connection to What the Daily WTF? was lost, please wait while we try to reconnect.