GitKraken
-
[mod - jeffed from, as should be obvious, from the Status Thread - PJH]
@Mikael_Svahnberg said in The Official Status Thread:
Knowing how much you love git, @blakeyrat, may I draw your attention to https://www.gitkraken.com/ ? I've spent all of five minutes playing with it, and it certainly does look nice.
Oooooh me likes the look of that will get back to you to complain about it laters!
*edit I'm not overly impressed.
-
@Mikael_Svahnberg said in The Official Status Thread:
may I draw your attention to https://www.gitkraken.com/
OMG! I regret clicking that link ... Did someone necro'd a Geocities design?
-
@Mikael_Svahnberg said in The Official Status Thread:
To save anyone else, bothered about such things, their time:
No, you can't change the stuff in those boxes, which I'm assuming it's picking up from (in my case)Edit - it appears you can - dunno wny I couldn't before I posted this~/.gitconfig
No, you can't dismiss that box without agreeing to register.
No, nothing else works there (it's modal) unless you agree to register.
-
@PJH said in The Official Status Thread:
Edit - it appears you can - dunno wny I couldn't before I posted this
Nevertheless - you are still required to provide cromulent details..
-
And there's more..
Admin access to my public keys with no option to deny such access?
Ditto with private repositories?
I understand that this is probably a tool for those with an even less firm grasp of git than I do, but still...
-
@PJH said in The Official Status Thread:
And there's more..
Admin access to my public keys with no option to deny such access?
Ditto with private repositories?
I understand that this is probably a tool for those with an even less firm grasp of git than I do, but still...
yeah..... fsck that shite. i don't trust gitkraken that much.
though githug does let you change those permissions after the fact, i do not trust gitkraken to suddenly decide that it won't work at all withthe permissions you restricted itself to, and i sure as fsck do not trust it to not get hacked and now so am i.
i'll just pull up my big girl panties and learn the CLI thank you very much.
-
@PJH
Whoeps ... seems like the screenshot is showing your e-mail ...
-
@Luhmann said in The Official Status Thread:
Whoeps ... seems like the screenshot is showing your e-mail ...
It's alright - that's my publicly known email address for the work I do at IANA.
-
@accalia and @PJH said in The Official Status Thread:
@PJH said in The Official Status Thread:
And there's more..
Admin access to my public keys with no option to deny such access?
Ditto with private repositories?
I understand that this is probably a tool for those with an even less firm grasp of git than I do, but still...
yeah..... fsck that shite. i don't trust gitkraken that much.
though githug does let you change those permissions after the fact, i do not trust gitkraken to suddenly decide that it won't work at all withthe permissions you restricted itself to, and i sure as fsck do not trust it to not get hacked and now so am i.
i'll just pull up my big girl panties and learn the CLI thank you very much.
So... If it is a git client, how is it supposed to work with your git repositories unless it has access to them?
-
@Mikael_Svahnberg Holy fuck that's retarded
-
@Mikael_Svahnberg Desktop Node App
-
@Mikael_Svahnberg admin access?
-
@Mikael_Svahnberg said in The Official Status Thread:
So... If it is a git client, how is it supposed to work with your git repositories unless it has access to them?
it needs access to them, it does not fucking need admin access to everything i have on github.
read/write to the repo will be MORE than enough. there is no reason it needs access to my SSH keys, nor any need for it to manage deploy keys or repository settings.
-
@accalia Yeah and what if it set your symbolic links to full access!? That's be a horrible security hole!
-
@blakeyrat said in The Official Status Thread:
@accalia Yeah and what if it set your symbolic links to full access!?
That's what you bring up? not the glaring "grab all the permissions because the developer didn't want to think about what permissions would be needed"? not the "gee that's maybe a bad idea to give a third party access to literally all of your repositories public and private, even if you are only using it on one repository"? no, you go for that.
classy.
and you wonder why people won't stop throwing your little indiscretions in your face? well i can't possibly imagine why they would do that to you when you delight in doing the same to them.
-
@accalia Except: you actually said that.
The "indiscretions" people throw in my face are generally shit they made up.
-
@accalia said in The Official Status Thread:
there is no reason it needs access to my SSH keys, nor any need for it to manage deploy keys or repository settings.
There is if it's someone totally unaccustomed to git and wants the program to do it for them.
My gripe is the lack of granularity regarding security (which you mentioned.)
And on that note, I think this little sub-thread needs it's own topic so those ignoring The Status Thread can have a chance to join in...
-
@PJH Then why not have two buttons:
-
I'm new to git and want GitKraken to handle everything for me
-
I'm experienced with git and want to manage my repositories by myself
Leading you to two different permissions pages.
-
-
@PJH said in The Official Status Thread:
And there's more..
Admin access to my public keys with no option to deny such access?
Ditto with private repositories?
I understand that this is probably a tool for those with an even less firm grasp of git than I do, but still...
yeah..... fsck that shite. i don't trust gitkraken that much.
though githug does let you change those permissions after the fact, i do not trust gitkraken to suddenly decide that it won't work at all withthe permissions you restricted itself to, and i sure as fsck do not trust it to not get hacked and now so am i.
i'll just pull up my big girl panties and learn the CLI thank you very much.
Ehr... What's it gonna do with Public keys? Aren't those meant to be... public? The app is running on your PC where your private keys are, so you might have already lost.
It's the "Deploy keys" part below that somewhat scares me. They could deploy their own public key so that their matching private key has access to your repos. Likely it's just a way of getting a "Quick setup", but it's still odd.
-
Who dares start a new thread in my name!
I'll flood it with kraken images until I'm happy it's being derailed
If anyone knows of a good tool for easily seeing multiple git branch histories at once would be much obliged!
-
-
My Christ! Is that a regular sized squid?
-
-
If anyone knows of a good tool for easily seeing multiple git branch histories at once would be much obliged!
-
@ben_lubar said in GitKraken:
If anyone knows of a good tool for easily seeing multiple git branch histories at once would be much obliged!
I suppose I should said comprehend somewhere in that sentence. Those lines look like gibberish!
-
Ehr... What's it gonna do with Public keys?
add its own so it has access even if you revoke the oauth permissions?
remove yours so you lose access?
it's asking for ADMIN access to the public keys. not just read access. it could do ANYTHING
-
@ben_lubar said in GitKraken:
If anyone knows of a good tool for easily seeing multiple git branch histories at once would be much obliged!
I suppose I should said comprehend somewhere in that sentence. Those lines look like gibberish!
Here, let's try a different repo: https://github.com/SockDrawer/SockBot/network
-
-
Ehr... What's it gonna do with Public keys?
Delete them. Add their own. That's what admin access to them allows.
... and ...
-
Ehr... What's it gonna do with Public keys?
add its own so it has access even if you revoke the oauth permissions?
remove yours so you lose access?
it's asking for ADMIN access to the public keys. not just read access. it could do ANYTHING
@JBert said in GitKraken:
Ehr... What's it gonna do with Public keys?
Delete them. Add their own
-
@ben_lubar I'm cruising for a merge conflict over here:
-
@DogsB gitextensions show multiple branches in the history, just not multiple repositories, not sure what you want.
-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j1rP21RcbH0
If this is jeffed why I replied to it!
-
@Yamikuronue killed a little over half a bottle of that one night. Not a good time.