Peas, jest here mii out awn these won
-
-
Don't think it's
s; my profile takes longer to load than yours, yet you have ≅3× as many s as I have
-
-
Interesting… for me, everyone's profile loads quicker than my own. So it's useless comparing loading your own profile to others.
-
Unscientific test shows you both tied at about 6 seconds.
Also:
- Be in a thread (foo)
- Click to another thread (bar)
- Click a user card
- Click that person's name to load their profile
- After the profile loads, click back
Expected: Thread bar loads
Actual: Thread foo loads
-
Could it be because of PMs?
It has to get the amounts from somewhere ...
-
That sounds like this one they fixed on meta today: https://meta.discourse.org/t/clicking-browser-back-button-skips-to-home/28801?u=nighware
-
Interesting… for me, everyone's profile loads quicker than my own. So it's useless comparing loading your own profile to others.
Just had a "duh" moment. When viewing your own profile, you pull additional information that you don't pull when you view another user's profile. In short, you can only compare the time it takes to load other users' profiles, but you can't compare your own profile.
-
As a mod we count flags for the user so @abarker and @boomzilla get the gift of slightly slower user pages for everyone.
-
Has perf improved since my perf patches were applied 12 hours ago?
-
Seems better to me. I even wagered into t/1000(look-no-touch) and seemed more responsive than lately.
-
ObjectivelySubjectively it feels faster. MUCH faster on pc, not so much on mobile. Mobile/tablet seems to have acquired a handful of new exciting bugs (because of faster loading perchance?)
-
Objectively it feels faster.
That sentence feels weird.
Is "objectively" getting the "literally" treatment now?
-
Shit, excuse my lack of English proficiency. I meant the reverse. Is fixed now, sorry.
-
Performance is still variable, but so far, we've not had any 5xx storms. Without objective data, it's hard to say for sure, and I'd want to wait for a few more days before saying for definite anyway, but it does seem to be an improvement overall.
-
This is what sarcasm does. You can only say 'Your opinion is objectively wrong' so many times before someone misunderstands the meaning.
-
I agree with the others. Performance feels better since the updates.
-
Seems the problems haven't been solved completely though:
At least it seems to be recovering quicker
-
Seems the problems haven't been solved completely though:
Yeah, still periodic cootie raids.
-
Discourse is the shit.
So you like it now?
switch to forum software that isn't the shit.
Why would you want something that's not the shit?
-
Hilarious.
-
Give him a break. Many non-native English speakers have no damn clue how articles work.
-
42k posts in a thread shouldn't bring a forum down so regularly. Or at all.
2+2 is a poker forum running vBulletin. Here's a thread with over 154,000 posts: http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/28/internet-poker/person-person-transfers-first-post-must-read-posting-rules-receive-points-1529/
-
And the page loads in under a second. So it can be done.
-
Well yeah. After all, it doesn't load every post id any time you think about reading the thread.
-
Yup. Although, if someone wants to claim it looks like a toxic hellstew, I can't disagree.
-
Nah, it's too grey for that; it's more like a 70s concrete tower block ;)
-
-
Have any of the discodevs explained why they'd do such a seemingly-stupid thing?
Have they ever?
-
-
Maybe they did it with bots. Bots can't work on Discourse, so it's a non-issue here.
-
You have no idea how much I want to summon @summ0nbot here...
<inb4 wooshed on blakey's point
-
or @zoidberg?
-
Give him a break. Many
non-native English speakers have no damn clue how articles work.FTFY
-
vB 3.8 all looks like that. This is one of the less repugnant concrete tower blocks, even if they have a weird-ass layout.
-
@nightware said:
Here's a thread with over 154,000 posts
Unpossible. Nobody does this with forums.
Only in Jeff's cloud-cuckoo land of forums.
-
@loopback0 said:
@nightware said:
Here's a thread with over 154,000 posts
Unpossible. Nobody does this with forums.
Only in Jeff's cloud-cuckoo land of forums.
People do do it, but they shouldn't because it's not civilized
-
On the one hand it's an anti-pattern of sorts that can be obtuse and unpleasant especially for newcomers.
On the other hand it's a long-held staple of a variety of communities that have little direct overlap either thematically, stylistically or even particularly culturally. It's not like we can argue a form of cargo cultism so much.
I guess it depends whether you buy into Jeff's vision of civilised - I don't and I see it as a cloud-cuckoo land. YMMV.
-
It seems to me that moderators often withdraw slightly from the community on regular forums as they get more responsibility. I don't know exactly why, but if I were to guess I'd say they don't want to start shit, when they have something to loose.
Jeffs approach prevents that. And encourages moderators to participate (or spam)
-
-
Oh, I thought it was kind of like SO where you got auto promoted to mod if you got enough up votes.
(just based on other criteria)
-
That is the plan for TL4 (in 10 years :D ). Mods will still be manually selected by admins, I think.
Filed Under: Then again, TL4 is pretty much mod...
-
I hate to ask, but is this documented somewhere? (I seem to be able to edit titles now I'm tl3)
-
http://what.thedailywtf.com/t/user-trust-levels/792/1
Filed Under: Might be changing whenever Jeff feels like it, though.
-
Considering that both Discourse and StackOverflow have Jeff input, this is not entirely surprising.
-
Editting a topic title is 99% of the time
indent preformatted text by 4 spacesthanks shitty mobile ui a dick move. 97% of the time it's funny though.
-
As low as 97%?
-
The other 3% are mine, apparently.
-
+1 funny.
I'm frankly shocked that my change of the avatar history title to hatvatar history is still there months later. It's not even that funny
-
s?
