Poll: Should we have 3^n badges for ineligible posts?
Should we have 3^n badges for ineligible posts?
- Why don't we have these things already?
- WE DON'T NEED NO STEENKING BADGES
- BADGES? Must collect them all!
- badger badger badger
@pjh, I know you were looking to do 3^n badges for reads at some point but the queries weren't working out. so i have an idea: what about inverting the eligible posts for the 3^n badge series?
mott555 last edited by
Post count badges for intentionally gaming the system? Perfect!
CreatedToDislikeThis last edited by
No - 3^n badges for edits instead!
Or maybe just 3^n badges for the largest number associated with the person in the database?
chubertdev last edited by
3^n for how little that you care about bots