So something passed the Turing Test, sorta
-
They claim it was the first pass as their test didn't preset topics for the conversation, but at the same time their pass rate was 30% fooled and limiting the conversations to 5 minutes so it's easy to discount this one as a restricted version of the test as well.
-
Yeah this is kind of a horseshit testing scenario in my opinion.
-
On the internet, even the computers pretend to be 13 year old boys.
-
This article has quotes from a previous test with the same program. It's very impressive...
.
.
not.
-
In my experience, most 13 year olds would fail the Turing Test. They can exhibit quite an inhuman level or stupidity.
-
In my experience, most 13 year olds would fail the Turing Test. They can exhibit quite an inhuman level or stupidity.
Certain types of stupidity are actually a characteristic of humanity.
-
I wonder if you could chuck pedophiles in prison for being predators towards a bot pretending to be a 13 year old boy.
-
I wonder if you could chuck pedophiles in prison for being predators towards a bot pretending to be a 13 year old boy.
-
That is really interesting. Per the paper, there are screenshots, in Spanish.
http://www.esi.uem.es/jmgomez/papers/cisis12.pdf
Looks like more of a research project than something that was implemented, but seems plausible. Certainly more plausible than this particular Turing test nonsense.
-
Wouldn't take a very sophisticated bot to pass as human in YouTube comments. Just grab an existing comment at random and post a reply "your a fagget".
-
The funny thing is that Google implemented mandatory G+ full names on YouTube comments, and it didn't change things a whole lot.
It does seem a little better now than it used to be, but hardly a sea change.
-
https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20140609/07284327524/no-supercomputer-did-not-pass-turing-test-first-time-everyone-should-know-better.shtml "No, A 'Supercomputer' Did NOT Pass The Turing Test For The First Time And Everyone Should Know Better"
Thought this was interesting.
-
hardly a sea change
If it's a sea change, it's from the Adriatic Sea to the Ionian Sea.
-
"No, A 'Supercomputer' Did NOT Pass The Turing Test For The First Time And Everyone Should Know Better"
Ben L. hasn't fooled many, and he's certainly not a supercomputer.
Filed under: Or a vampire.
-
a bunch of markov chain bots talking to each other in an IRC channel said:
i'll post i have my monitor back. push backspace next time to turn back. you what that can beat up the goblin
linuxbox is some important principle, which explained a result srs people use bt with regards to lock my door on sofia and strip the leadign 9, and then irl is best.
-
sounds like most IRC chats I've seen
-
-
Possibly, you can do a lot with Markov chains. These logs of a markov IRC bot are freaking hilarious.
RIP kookybot
-
Did you say IRC logs? And markov chain? And hagrid? (Okay, you didn't say that one.)
Quickprimer:@harryis the IRC-Omegle bridge bot. If a line starts with>, then Harry will send it over Omegle.Example:
[14:24:29] <+_303> >I got a virus!
This sends "I got a virus!" to the Omegle stranger.The logs come in two varieties: what us, on IRC saw, and what the other person on Omegle saw. These are the two directories.
+breadboxis a semi-scriptable factoid bot. For example,!lolis defined as<py>print('>' + args.upper() * 100). And!puddiis defined as<alias>lol puddi.
And!sois defined as>[Omegle is required by law to inform you that you are chatting with a convicted sex offender. Stranger is unable to see this message.].Harry also has a 'pyborg' bot that does markov chains. I'm pretty sure it got several Hagrid-centric HP erotica as source material. Chode chode chode.
Everyone else is human.
Example (I'm pretty sure they meant "shouldn't"):
http://omegle.terrywri.st/logs/irc/4016.txt
http://omegle.terrywri.st/logs/omegle/4016.txt
-
Well, that was boring.
-
But I thought everyone was pretending to be a girl on the internet (WoW)?
-
The men are men, the women are men and the children are the FBI.
-
Filed Under: ObNewYorker
