Symbolic Screenshot






  • We would now like to to have your youngest born, please.



  •  That's an awfully cheery installer for a rape-simulator game.



  • @Lorne Kates said:

     That's an awfully cheery installer for a rape-simulator game.

     

    As you can see, it's an IDE. So wouldn't that be an IDE for a rape-simulator game?

     



  • Salesforce and its bastard offspring are TRWTF. It's great for contractors' billable hours though.



  • @fire2k said:


    TRWTF is the hugemonguous list of websites our work proxy blocks.



  •  Yeah, I can never seem to reach example.com either.

     



  • That's an argument I want to see tested in court: "The installer never gave me a EULA". That is if EULAs are still considered enforceable anyways.

    The other EULA argument I want to see tested is what would happen if a minor installed the software.



  • @DCRoss said:

     Yeah, I can never seem to reach example.com either.


    Just use example.com's IP address: 127.0.0.1.

     

     



  • @RichP said:

    Just use example.com's IP address: 127.0.0.1.

    ; <<>> DiG 9.7.3 <<>> example.com
    ;; global options: +cmd
    ;; Got answer:
    ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 30878
    ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0
    
    ;; QUESTION SECTION:
    ;example.com.                   IN      A
    
    ;; ANSWER SECTION:
    example.com.            15252   IN      A       192.0.43.10
    
    ;; Query time: 31 msec
    ;; SERVER: 192.168.5.1#53(192.168.5.1)
    ;; WHEN: Thu May 30 11:42:43 2013
    ;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 45
    


  • @MiffTheFox said:

    That's an argument I want to see tested in court: "The installer never gave me a EULA". That is if EULAs are still considered enforceable anyways.

    The other EULA argument I want to see tested is what would happen if a minor installed the software.

    You know, my cat sometimes walks on my keyboards, and modern interfaces are so overloaded with keyboard shortcuts that she never fails to trigger some interesting things. I'm sure installing some software and accepting the EULA are not out of her reach.



  • @MiffTheFox said:

    @RichP said:

    Just use example.com's IP address: 127.0.0.1.

    ; <<>> DiG 9.7.3 <<>> example.com
    ;; global options: +cmd
    ;; Got answer:
    ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 30878
    ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0
    
    ;; QUESTION SECTION:
    ;example.com.                   IN      A
    
    ;; ANSWER SECTION:
    example.com.            15252   IN      A       192.0.43.10
    
    ;; Query time: 31 msec
    ;; SERVER: 192.168.5.1#53(192.168.5.1)
    ;; WHEN: Thu May 30 11:42:43 2013
    ;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 45
    

     

    Hey, you have the same internal subnet I do!  What vendor uses 192.168.5.0/24 as a default?

     



  • @RichP said:

    @DCRoss said:

    Yeah, I can never seem to reach example.com either.


    Just use example.com's IP address: 127.0.0.1.

     

    My god, it's full of porn!

     

     


  • Winner of the 2016 Presidential Election

    @DCRoss said:

    @RichP said:

    @DCRoss said:

    Yeah, I can never seem to reach example.com either.


    Just use example.com's IP address: 127.0.0.1.

     

    My god, it's full of porn!

     

     

    And it's some really sick shit.



  • @fire2k said:

    @Lorne Kates said:

     That's an awfully cheery installer for a rape-simulator game.

     

    As you can see, it's an IDE. So wouldn't that be an IDE for a rape-simulator game?

    It's a subtitle: "Indecorous Derrière Enterer"



  • @RichP said:

    @DCRoss said:

     Yeah, I can never seem to reach example.com either.


    Just use example.com's IP address: 127.0.0.1.

     

     

    Mandatory cartoon




  • @Ronald said:

    @RichP said:

    @DCRoss said:

     Yeah, I can never seem to reach example.com either.


    Just use example.com's IP address: 127.0.0.1.

     

     

    Mandatory cartoon


     

    Good Jesus, and you complain about MY drawing.

     



  • I find User Friendly much more offensive than XKCD. I demand a Roseanne.



  • @drurowin said:

    Good Jesus, and you complain about MY drawing.

     

    Drawing is ugly but the cartoons were often funny:




  • @Ronald said:

    Drawing is ugly but the cartoons were often funny:

    Are you trolling?



  • @morbiuswilters said:

    @Ronald said:
    Drawing is ugly but the cartoons were often funny:

    Are you trolling?

    Well nevermind I'm going back playing outside



  • @blakeyrat said:

    I find User Friendly much more offensive than XKCD.

    I don't. Oh, yes, UF is god-awful, but it's obviously god-awful; you're not going to lose any respect for someone when they tell you they like UF, because you never had respect for them in the first place.

    xkcd is subtly awful. It may not be as shitty as UF, but it's highly revered for being "clever", which I find much more nauseating. Also, when friends and loved ones tell you they like it, you just have to nod and try not to look ashamed for them. You can't start screaming at them that they are fucking morons who wouldn't know clever humor or good taste if it shat into their open, quivering, expectant mouth.

    In summary: UF is a crackpot who says we should kill all black people, but nobody listens to his ranting. xkcd is a crackpot who says we should take away black people's vote and has millions of followers. I am much, much more troubled by the latter.



  • I prefer this shitty IT comic:

    [MFD]

    I genuinely miss MFD... well I miss making fun of it in the comment thread. Same thing.



  • @Ronald said:

    @RichP said:

    @DCRoss said:

     Yeah, I can never seem to reach example.com either.


    Just use example.com's IP address: 127.0.0.1.

     

     

    Mandatory cartoon


    Why the fuck does that IRC server not show IP addresses?



  • @Ronald said:

    Mandatory cartoon




    (Insert Roseanne here)
     

    I actually did this once. I was actually amazed how well it worked; he became furious to a hilarious degree, threatening to hack me "harder" and sue me for "counter-attacking" him. Gotta love incompetent script-kiddies and their non-idiot-proof tools...



  • @morbiuswilters said:

    xkcd is subtly awful. It may not be as shitty as UF, but it's highly revered for being "clever", which I find much more nauseating. Also, when friends and loved ones tell you they like it, you just have to nod and try not to look ashamed for them. You can't start screaming at them that they are fucking morons who wouldn't know clever humor or good taste if it shat into their open, quivering, expectant mouth.
    I don't understand how people can think that humour has to be clever. It must be hell to only appreciate clever humour :(.



  • @Ben L. said:

    Why the fuck does that IRC server not show IP addresses?

    I didn't think most did..



  • @Adanine said:

    @morbiuswilters said:
    xkcd is subtly awful. It may not be as shitty as UF, but it's highly revered for being "clever", which I find much more nauseating. Also, when friends and loved ones tell you they like it, you just have to nod and try not to look ashamed for them. You can't start screaming at them that they are fucking morons who wouldn't know clever humor or good taste if it shat into their open, quivering, expectant mouth.
    I don't understand how people can think that humour has to be clever. It must be hell to only appreciate clever humour :(.

    I didn't say humor had to be clever, I said that xkcd isn't clever (and it's not funny in any other way) and that people who called it clever made me sick.



  • @morbiuswilters said:

    @Adanine said:
    @morbiuswilters said:
    xkcd is subtly awful. It may not be as shitty as UF, but it's highly revered for being "clever", which I find much more nauseating. Also, when friends and loved ones tell you they like it, you just have to nod and try not to look ashamed for them. You can't start screaming at them that they are fucking morons who wouldn't know clever humor or good taste if it shat into their open, quivering, expectant mouth.
    I don't understand how people can think that humour has to be clever. It must be hell to only appreciate clever humour :(.

    I didn't say humor had to be clever, I said that xkcd isn't clever (and it's not funny in any other way) and that people who called it clever made me sick.

    No, they were asking for a cleaver. They wanted to cut it off.



  • The real wtf:

    License 3 was for HTTP. As in the protocol. I just accepted and acknowledged HTTP. No, I don't know what that means either



  • @fire2k said:

    The real wtf:

    License 3 was for HTTP. As in the protocol. I just accepted and acknowledged HTTP. No, I don't know what that means either

    Post the license. I want to see it.



  • @Ben L. said:

    @fire2k said:

    The real wtf:

    License 3 was for HTTP. As in the protocol. I just accepted and acknowledged HTTP. No, I don't know what that means either

    Post the license. I want to see it.

     

    I can't. Apparently once you accept the salesforce license agreement, it will never ever ask you for it again, even if you uninstall and re-install the software.

    Maybe they set a registry key or some other bullshit

     



  • @fire2k said:

    @Ben L. said:

    @fire2k said:

    The real wtf:

    License 3 was for HTTP. As in the protocol. I just accepted and acknowledged HTTP. No, I don't know what that means either

    Post the license. I want to see it.

     

    I can't. Apparently once you accept the salesforce license agreement, it will never ever ask you for it again, even if you uninstall and re-install the software.

    Maybe they set a registry key or some other bullshit

     

    I'm guessing it was the text of RFC 2616.



  • @morbiuswilters said:

    I didn't think most did..
    Most did (though they usually showed hostnames). Nowadays it depends - many networks have cloaks, but the old-school ones (eg. EFNet) still show your hostname or IP.



  • @ender said:

    @morbiuswilters said:
    I didn't think most did..
    Most did (though they usually showed hostnames). Nowadays it depends - many networks have cloaks, but the old-school ones (eg. EFNet) still show your hostname or IP.

    I thought most just showed finger results, which is why you had people with hostnames like "awesome-dude.has-a-big-wang.awesome-wang".


  • Winner of the 2016 Presidential Election

    @morbiuswilters said:

    awesome-dude.has-a-big-wang.awesome-wang

    You can just call me Joe.


Log in to reply
 

Looks like your connection to What the Daily WTF? was lost, please wait while we try to reconnect.