Best Language Ever: ArnoldC
-
ArnoldC
Arnold Schwarzenegger based programming language. Contribute to lhartikk/ArnoldC development by creating an account on GitHub.
IT'S SHOWTIME HEY CHRISTMAS TREE isLessThan10 YOU SET US UP @NO PROBLEMO HEY CHRISTMAS TREE n YOU SET US UP 0 STICK AROUND isLessThan10 GET TO THE CHOPPER n HERE IS MY INVITATION n GET UP 1 ENOUGH TALK TALK TO THE HAND n GET TO THE CHOPPER isLessThan10 HERE IS MY INVITATION 10 LET OFF SOME STEAM BENNET n ENOUGH TALK CHILL YOU HAVE BEEN TERMINATED
-
GET TO THE CHOPPERconsidered harmful?
-
Variable assignment, yo.
-
The correct value for NULL should be TUMOR.
IF IT'S NOT A TUMOR
-
For a moment, I hoped it was another Arnold.
Hey, that would be a fun one, actually:
SALUTE TRY BE USEFUL CATCH RUN AWAY END I'LL BE IN MY BUNK
-
Return WHATAGUY
-
Isn't that a feature to be added in Arnold++ though?
-
You forgot the most obvious: the loop instruction.
SMOKE ME A KIPPER ... I'LL BE BACK FOR BREAKFASTOf course, we need an exit condition.
TOODLE-PIPSKIAnd naturally every single exception needs to quote a Space Corps Directive. Something like a memory violation might result in quoting SC-005 in the way ORA does so well.
-
And naturally every single exception needs to quote a Space Corps Directive. Something like a memory violation might result in quoting SC-005 in the way ORA does so well.
Yes, but it needs to quote the wrong directive, every single time. Null pointer? Quote the limitation on the number of cars per committee member due to the Chinese delegation.
-
Done with a variable?
YOU HAVE JUST BEEN ERASED
-
Even SC-005 isn't exactly quite appropriate ("Gross negligence, leading to the endangerment of personnel.") but yes, that would be quite appropriate as a thing to do.
-
Quote the limitation on the number of cars per committee member due to the Chinese delegation.
The best part of that is it was like Section 3, Subsection 4, Heading B, Paragraph 46 was about parking spaces, and Section 3, Subsection 4, Heading B, Paragraph 47 was about treatment of POWs during wartime.
With organization like that, who could get it mixed-up!
-
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_Corps_Directives
Someone actually wrote them all down. The fuck.
-
That's a very Wikipedia thing to do. I think it has all of Deep Space 9's "Rules of Acquisitions" written down, too.
EDIT: oh right, it was a big long number followed by stroke B for parking and stroke C for rights of POWs. Same joke.
-
It's the sort of thing that makes me think Wikipedia jumped the shark on its relevance, just like StackOverflow did back when every fucking question about JavaScript invokes jQuery even when it really doesn't need to.
-
-
I was under the impression that people of both sexes were quite capable of fucking.
-
It's the sort of thing that makes me think Wikipedia jumped the shark on its relevance,
That's over reacting. And it's definitely better than censoring it becomes some self-important prick thinks shit isn't worthy of being recorded.
-
No, my problem isn't that it's recorded somewhere. I think it's great that it's recorded - but I don't think Wikipedia is necessarily the venue for it.
They have notability guidelines that exclude useful and meaningful things but they completely allow things like an article for every episode of popular TV series, as well as articles about the TV series for meta references.
To my mind, that's not the sort of thing that Wikipedia was intended to be about, but concede that there isn't really a better venue short of hiving stuff off to dedicated subwikis.
For example take the comment about the Rules of Acquisition. I don't believe that's the sort of thing that 'should' be on Wikipedia, but a better home would be something like Memory Alpha, something dedicated to the universe, leaving Wikipedia free for more factual information about the series, rather than in-universe considerations.
-
To my mind, that's not the sort of thing that Wikipedia was intended to be about,
I'm not sure where you got that. Seems perfectly in line with its goals. /shrug
-
They have notability guidelines that exclude useful and meaningful things but they completely allow things like an article for every episode of popular TV series, as well as articles about the TV series for meta references.
Ah shit. I was about to bring out my favorite example: the "Hawk" spaceship from Space: 1999 had an entire page despite:
- being a quick and dirty repainting of their existing Eagle spaceship model,
- appearing in exactly one episode
Alas, the Hawk (Space: 1999) page is no more.
EDIT: note that I don't care if the Hawk gets a page. I'm all for it. I just like pointing out the hypocrisy of deleting a webcomic with 50,000 viewers just because no newspaper has written about it, but keeping a ... well something like the Hawk.
-
That's exactly what I mean.
It's worth documenting somewhere. It's interesting enough to be recorded somewhere. I just don't think the Hitchhiker's Guide to the Earth is the place for it.
-
Meh...now you're going to make me look at all these other random places.
-
It's the sort of thing that makes me think Wikipedia jumped the shark on its relevance, just like StackOverflow did back when every fucking question about JavaScript invokes jQuery even when it really doesn't need to.
Besides, weren't we doing the moral equivalent of that here years earlier?
-
How sexist.
@Arantor said:I was under the impression that people of both sexes were quite capable of fucking.
It's discrimination against asexuals.
